Understanding patient perspectives on breast cancer risk: a qualitative study to inform genetic testing communication in the primary care setting.

IF 1.8 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Jennifer McGuire, Vanessa Diaz, Katherine Sterba, Kevin S Hughes, Sarah Tucker Marrison
{"title":"Understanding patient perspectives on breast cancer risk: a qualitative study to inform genetic testing communication in the primary care setting.","authors":"Jennifer McGuire, Vanessa Diaz, Katherine Sterba, Kevin S Hughes, Sarah Tucker Marrison","doi":"10.1007/s12687-026-00933-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early breast cancer risk identification is essential for targeted screening and prevention. Provider uptake of risk-stratified screening remains low, often due to limited education on risk assessment, clinical time restrictions, and limited resources for systematic implementation. Patient perspectives on incorporating screening tools into routine care are not well understood. This study elicited patient experiences and preferences regarding risk assessment and genetic testing in primary care. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals at average and high breast cancer risk. The interview guide was developed using the informed decision-making framework. Participants reviewed a decision aid and provided feedback on risk and genetic testing communication. Interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis was conducted by two independent coders. Study participants had an average age of 44 with 45% of individuals self-reporting high-risk for breast cancer. Women across risk levels desired clear, empathetic communication with detailed screening and genetic testing information. Financial constraints, fear of results, and confidentiality were perceived barriers. Key benefits included informed decision-making and prevention potential. Participants emphasized accessible information, personalized communication, and clear follow-up plans. High-risk participants demonstrated more active information-seeking, desired ongoing support after testing, and emphasized family. Most found the communication guide and decision aid supportive for informed decision-making. Patient-centered communication and accessible, comprehensive information are key for communication of breast cancer risk. Addressing financial barriers and anxieties surrounding genetic testing will be critical for equitable uptake. Future work should consider these patient preferences in designing interventions to improve risk-aligned care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13473029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-026-00933-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early breast cancer risk identification is essential for targeted screening and prevention. Provider uptake of risk-stratified screening remains low, often due to limited education on risk assessment, clinical time restrictions, and limited resources for systematic implementation. Patient perspectives on incorporating screening tools into routine care are not well understood. This study elicited patient experiences and preferences regarding risk assessment and genetic testing in primary care. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals at average and high breast cancer risk. The interview guide was developed using the informed decision-making framework. Participants reviewed a decision aid and provided feedback on risk and genetic testing communication. Interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis was conducted by two independent coders. Study participants had an average age of 44 with 45% of individuals self-reporting high-risk for breast cancer. Women across risk levels desired clear, empathetic communication with detailed screening and genetic testing information. Financial constraints, fear of results, and confidentiality were perceived barriers. Key benefits included informed decision-making and prevention potential. Participants emphasized accessible information, personalized communication, and clear follow-up plans. High-risk participants demonstrated more active information-seeking, desired ongoing support after testing, and emphasized family. Most found the communication guide and decision aid supportive for informed decision-making. Patient-centered communication and accessible, comprehensive information are key for communication of breast cancer risk. Addressing financial barriers and anxieties surrounding genetic testing will be critical for equitable uptake. Future work should consider these patient preferences in designing interventions to improve risk-aligned care.

了解患者对乳腺癌风险的看法:一项定性研究,为初级保健环境中的基因检测交流提供信息。
早期乳腺癌风险识别对于有针对性的筛查和预防至关重要。提供者对风险分层筛查的接受程度仍然很低,这通常是由于风险评估教育有限、临床时间限制以及系统实施的资源有限。患者对将筛查工具纳入常规护理的看法尚不清楚。本研究揭示了患者在初级保健中对风险评估和基因检测的经验和偏好。研究人员对患乳腺癌的平均风险和高风险人群进行了20次半结构化访谈。访谈指南是利用知情决策框架编制的。与会者审查了一项决策援助,并就风险和基因检测交流提供了反馈。访谈由两位独立编码员进行转录和专题分析。研究参与者的平均年龄为44岁,其中45%的人自我报告有乳腺癌的高风险。不同风险级别的妇女希望与详细的筛查和基因检测信息进行清晰、有同理心的沟通。财政限制、对结果的恐惧和保密被认为是障碍。主要益处包括知情决策和预防潜力。与会者强调可获取的信息、个性化的沟通和明确的后续计划。高风险参与者表现出更积极的信息寻求,希望在测试后得到持续的支持,并强调家庭。大多数人认为沟通指南和决策辅助有助于知情决策。以患者为中心的沟通和可获得的、全面的信息是乳腺癌风险沟通的关键。解决围绕基因检测的财务障碍和焦虑对于公平接受至关重要。未来的工作应该在设计干预措施时考虑这些患者的偏好,以改善与风险一致的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Community Genetics
Journal of Community Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals. Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues. The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书