Jennifer McGuire, Vanessa Diaz, Katherine Sterba, Kevin S Hughes, Sarah Tucker Marrison
{"title":"Understanding patient perspectives on breast cancer risk: a qualitative study to inform genetic testing communication in the primary care setting.","authors":"Jennifer McGuire, Vanessa Diaz, Katherine Sterba, Kevin S Hughes, Sarah Tucker Marrison","doi":"10.1007/s12687-026-00933-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early breast cancer risk identification is essential for targeted screening and prevention. Provider uptake of risk-stratified screening remains low, often due to limited education on risk assessment, clinical time restrictions, and limited resources for systematic implementation. Patient perspectives on incorporating screening tools into routine care are not well understood. This study elicited patient experiences and preferences regarding risk assessment and genetic testing in primary care. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals at average and high breast cancer risk. The interview guide was developed using the informed decision-making framework. Participants reviewed a decision aid and provided feedback on risk and genetic testing communication. Interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis was conducted by two independent coders. Study participants had an average age of 44 with 45% of individuals self-reporting high-risk for breast cancer. Women across risk levels desired clear, empathetic communication with detailed screening and genetic testing information. Financial constraints, fear of results, and confidentiality were perceived barriers. Key benefits included informed decision-making and prevention potential. Participants emphasized accessible information, personalized communication, and clear follow-up plans. High-risk participants demonstrated more active information-seeking, desired ongoing support after testing, and emphasized family. Most found the communication guide and decision aid supportive for informed decision-making. Patient-centered communication and accessible, comprehensive information are key for communication of breast cancer risk. Addressing financial barriers and anxieties surrounding genetic testing will be critical for equitable uptake. Future work should consider these patient preferences in designing interventions to improve risk-aligned care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13473029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-026-00933-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Early breast cancer risk identification is essential for targeted screening and prevention. Provider uptake of risk-stratified screening remains low, often due to limited education on risk assessment, clinical time restrictions, and limited resources for systematic implementation. Patient perspectives on incorporating screening tools into routine care are not well understood. This study elicited patient experiences and preferences regarding risk assessment and genetic testing in primary care. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals at average and high breast cancer risk. The interview guide was developed using the informed decision-making framework. Participants reviewed a decision aid and provided feedback on risk and genetic testing communication. Interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis was conducted by two independent coders. Study participants had an average age of 44 with 45% of individuals self-reporting high-risk for breast cancer. Women across risk levels desired clear, empathetic communication with detailed screening and genetic testing information. Financial constraints, fear of results, and confidentiality were perceived barriers. Key benefits included informed decision-making and prevention potential. Participants emphasized accessible information, personalized communication, and clear follow-up plans. High-risk participants demonstrated more active information-seeking, desired ongoing support after testing, and emphasized family. Most found the communication guide and decision aid supportive for informed decision-making. Patient-centered communication and accessible, comprehensive information are key for communication of breast cancer risk. Addressing financial barriers and anxieties surrounding genetic testing will be critical for equitable uptake. Future work should consider these patient preferences in designing interventions to improve risk-aligned care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals.
Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues.
The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries.
The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.