The hybrid implant-flap breast reconstruction-pearls and pitfalls: a narrative review.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gland surgery Pub Date : 2026-07-31 Epub Date: 2026-07-22 DOI:10.21037/gs-2025-399
Paulo P Piccolo, Maurice Y Nahabedian, Lisa Coleman, Mark Venturi, Alex Mesbahi, Silviu Diaconu
{"title":"The hybrid implant-flap breast reconstruction-pearls and pitfalls: a narrative review.","authors":"Paulo P Piccolo, Maurice Y Nahabedian, Lisa Coleman, Mark Venturi, Alex Mesbahi, Silviu Diaconu","doi":"10.21037/gs-2025-399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Autologous free tissue transfer is considered to be the gold-standard for breast reconstruction. The abdomen, thighs, buttocks and other donor sites have been well described in the literature. In slender patients with larger breasts who desire autologous reconstruction, breast asymmetry or insufficient volume may compromise the aesthetic or desired outcome. In these situations, hybrid reconstruction, in which the flap is combined with an implant, can provide desirable outcomes. The aim of this study to review of the available evidence and help guide clinical decision-making and optimization of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of the literature using keywords was performed by query of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria included retrospective and prospective studies that used free flaps for breast reconstruction (abdominal and other sources), studies that categorized their data into immediate and staged placement of implant, case series, case reports and review of literature. Studies from the last 30 years were included [1995-2025]. Studies that did not analyzed the use of free flaps combined with implants for breast reconstruction were not included.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Seventeen studies were identified. Of these 13 reported on patients who had free flaps augmented with an implant for breast reconstruction. Key findings included: A total of 359 patients and 598 breasts were reviewed. The majority of the of the free flaps (590) were abdominally based. The timing for implant placement was roughly evenly split between delayed (52%, 300 breasts) and immediate (48%, 298 breasts). Tissue expanders were used with the flap prior to the silicone implant in a minority of cases-11% of cases. Silicone implants were used 92% of cases. Mesh support (acellular dermal matrix or synthetic) was used in approximately 57% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Performing hybrid flap-implant breast reconstruction has been established as a safe and reliable approach on patients with larger breasts who desire autologous reconstruction and have paucity of autologous donor tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"15 7","pages":"204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13462755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2025-399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Autologous free tissue transfer is considered to be the gold-standard for breast reconstruction. The abdomen, thighs, buttocks and other donor sites have been well described in the literature. In slender patients with larger breasts who desire autologous reconstruction, breast asymmetry or insufficient volume may compromise the aesthetic or desired outcome. In these situations, hybrid reconstruction, in which the flap is combined with an implant, can provide desirable outcomes. The aim of this study to review of the available evidence and help guide clinical decision-making and optimization of outcomes.

Methods: A review of the literature using keywords was performed by query of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria included retrospective and prospective studies that used free flaps for breast reconstruction (abdominal and other sources), studies that categorized their data into immediate and staged placement of implant, case series, case reports and review of literature. Studies from the last 30 years were included [1995-2025]. Studies that did not analyzed the use of free flaps combined with implants for breast reconstruction were not included.

Key content and findings: Seventeen studies were identified. Of these 13 reported on patients who had free flaps augmented with an implant for breast reconstruction. Key findings included: A total of 359 patients and 598 breasts were reviewed. The majority of the of the free flaps (590) were abdominally based. The timing for implant placement was roughly evenly split between delayed (52%, 300 breasts) and immediate (48%, 298 breasts). Tissue expanders were used with the flap prior to the silicone implant in a minority of cases-11% of cases. Silicone implants were used 92% of cases. Mesh support (acellular dermal matrix or synthetic) was used in approximately 57% of cases.

Conclusions: Performing hybrid flap-implant breast reconstruction has been established as a safe and reliable approach on patients with larger breasts who desire autologous reconstruction and have paucity of autologous donor tissue.

混合移植物-皮瓣乳房重建-珍珠与陷阱:叙述回顾。
背景与目的:自体游离组织移植被认为是乳房重建的金标准。腹部、大腿、臀部和其他供体部位在文献中都有很好的描述。对于身材苗条、乳房较大的患者,如果希望进行自体重建,乳房不对称或体积不足可能会影响美观或预期的结果。在这些情况下,混合重建,其中皮瓣与种植体结合,可以提供理想的结果。本研究的目的是回顾现有的证据,帮助指导临床决策和优化结果。方法:通过检索MEDLINE (PubMed)、Embase、Cochrane Library进行关键词文献检索。纳入标准包括使用游离皮瓣进行乳房重建的回顾性和前瞻性研究(腹部和其他来源),将其数据分类为立即和分阶段放置植入物的研究,病例系列,病例报告和文献综述。纳入了过去30年的研究[1995-2025]。没有分析使用游离皮瓣联合植入物进行乳房重建的研究没有被包括在内。主要内容和发现:确定了17项研究。其中13例报道了使用游离皮瓣和植入物进行乳房重建的患者。主要发现包括:共检查了359例患者和598个乳房。大多数自由皮瓣(590例)位于腹部。植入时间大致平均分为延迟(52%,300个乳房)和立即(48%,298个乳房)。组织扩张器与皮瓣一起使用之前硅胶植入在少数情况下-11%的情况下。92%的病例使用硅胶植入物。大约57%的病例使用网状支架(脱细胞真皮基质或合成物)。结论:对于需要自体重建且缺乏自体供体组织的大乳房患者,采用混合皮瓣-种植体乳房重建是一种安全可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书