Determinants of out-of-pocket health expenditure: cross-country evidence across World Bank income groups.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sameer Sofi, Effat Yasmin
{"title":"Determinants of out-of-pocket health expenditure: cross-country evidence across World Bank income groups.","authors":"Sameer Sofi, Effat Yasmin","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2026.2717294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditure remains a major barrier to achieving Universal Health Coverage, yet limited evidence exists on whether its determinants differ systematically across World Bank income groups. This study examines the macroeconomic and health financing determinants of OOP health expenditure across 123 countries during 2000-2021.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Panel data from the World Bank and the World Health Organization were analyzed using the Instrumental Variables Two-Stage Least Squares (IV-2SLS) estimator to address endogeneity and unobserved heterogeneity. A dummy interaction approach captured income-specific effects across low-, middle-, and high-income economies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings reveal substantial heterogeneity. Economic growth reduces OOP expenditure in low-income countries but increases it in middle- and high-income economies, reflecting a shift from essential healthcare utilization to discretionary healthcare consumption. Government health expenditure consistently lowers OOP expenditure, with stronger effects in higher-income countries, whereas private health expenditure shows mixed effects. Higher HIV prevalence significantly increases OOP expenditure, particularly in low-income countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The determinants of OOP health expenditure differ markedly across income groups, indicating that uniform health financing policies may be ineffective. Income-sensitive strategies that strengthen public financing, promote inclusive economic growth, and improve financial protection are essential for reducing OOP expenditure and advancing UHC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2026.2717294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditure remains a major barrier to achieving Universal Health Coverage, yet limited evidence exists on whether its determinants differ systematically across World Bank income groups. This study examines the macroeconomic and health financing determinants of OOP health expenditure across 123 countries during 2000-2021.

Research design and methods: Panel data from the World Bank and the World Health Organization were analyzed using the Instrumental Variables Two-Stage Least Squares (IV-2SLS) estimator to address endogeneity and unobserved heterogeneity. A dummy interaction approach captured income-specific effects across low-, middle-, and high-income economies.

Results: The findings reveal substantial heterogeneity. Economic growth reduces OOP expenditure in low-income countries but increases it in middle- and high-income economies, reflecting a shift from essential healthcare utilization to discretionary healthcare consumption. Government health expenditure consistently lowers OOP expenditure, with stronger effects in higher-income countries, whereas private health expenditure shows mixed effects. Higher HIV prevalence significantly increases OOP expenditure, particularly in low-income countries.

Conclusions: The determinants of OOP health expenditure differ markedly across income groups, indicating that uniform health financing policies may be ineffective. Income-sensitive strategies that strengthen public financing, promote inclusive economic growth, and improve financial protection are essential for reducing OOP expenditure and advancing UHC.

自费医疗支出的决定因素:世界银行各收入群体的跨国证据。
背景:自付卫生支出仍然是实现全民健康覆盖的主要障碍,但关于其决定因素在世界银行各收入群体之间是否存在系统性差异的证据有限。本研究考察了2000-2021年123个国家OOP卫生支出的宏观经济和卫生筹资决定因素。研究设计和方法:使用工具变量两阶段最小二乘法(IV-2SLS)估计器分析来自世界银行和世界卫生组织的小组数据,以解决内生性和未观察到的异质性。虚拟互动方法捕捉了低收入、中等收入和高收入经济体的特定收入效应。结果:研究结果显示了大量的异质性。经济增长减少了低收入国家的OOP支出,但增加了中等收入和高收入经济体的OOP支出,反映出从基本医疗保健利用到可自由支配的医疗保健消费的转变。政府卫生支出持续降低OOP支出,在高收入国家的影响更大,而私人卫生支出的影响则好坏参半。较高的艾滋病毒流行率大大增加了OOP支出,特别是在低收入国家。结论:面向对象卫生支出的决定因素在不同收入群体之间存在显著差异,表明统一的卫生筹资政策可能是无效的。加强公共融资、促进包容性经济增长和改善财政保护的对收入敏感的战略对于减少全项目支出和推进全民健康覆盖至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书