Incidence and Risk Factors for Progression of Pachychoroid Subtype

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yu Jeat Chong, Angie Hon Chi Fong, Wendy Mei Hua Wong, Noa Gilead, Kelvin Yi Chong Teo, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung
{"title":"Incidence and Risk Factors for Progression of Pachychoroid Subtype","authors":"Yu Jeat Chong, Angie Hon Chi Fong, Wendy Mei Hua Wong, Noa Gilead, Kelvin Yi Chong Teo, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung","doi":"10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2026.3168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance The incidence and determinants of progression across the pachychoroid subtype remain incompletely characterized, limiting risk stratification and follow-up strategies. Objective To evaluate progression, diagnostic transitions, and associated risk factors in eyes with pachychoroid subtype. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study included participants with pachychoroid subtype, defined by subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) of 300 µm or greater measured beneath the foveal center point, recruited at centers in Asia. Participants underwent standardized clinical assessment and multimodal imaging and were followed up for 2 years. The study was conducted between July 2020 and November 2023, and data analysis was performed from November 2023 to February 2026. Exposures Baseline pachychoroid subtype phenotype and imaging characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was diagnostic progression within the pachychoroid subtype spectrum over 2 years. Secondary outcomes included incident neovascularization, treatment initiations, and changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and SFCT. Results A total of 205 eyes from 125 participants (mean [SD] age, 59.0 [8.8] years; 32 female participants [25.6%]) completed 2-year follow-up. At baseline, 39 eyes had uncomplicated pachychoroid (UP), 102 had pachychoroid pigment epitheliopathy (PPE), 47 had central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), and 17 had pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV). Mean (SD) changes from baseline in BCVA and SFCT were 0.13 (0.18) logMAR (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/25) to 0.11 (0.24) (20/25; difference, −0.02 logMAR [approximately 1 letter]; 95% CI, −0.05 to 0.02; <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P</jats:italic> = .33) and from 419 (83) µm to 424 (90) µm (difference, 6 µm; 95% CI, −5 to 16; <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P</jats:italic> = .32), respectively. Eyes with CSCR and PNV had worse baseline BCVA compared to eyes with UP and PPE. Progression occurred in 15 eyes (7.3%; 95% CI, 4.5%-11.6%), including 7 eyes with neovascularization, all of which had shallow, irregular retinal pigment epithelium elevation at baseline, among 116 eyes at baseline with such elevation. Conclusions and Relevance In this study among a relatively small cohort of 4 different levels of pachychoroid subtype, progression to a worse level was infrequent, as was worsening of visual acuity or choroidal thickening. Neovascularization was unusual and occurred exclusively in eyes with shallow, irregular retinal pigment epithelium elevation, suggesting the importance of this imaging feature if confirmed in subsequent studies.","PeriodicalId":14518,"journal":{"name":"JAMA ophthalmology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2026.3168","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance The incidence and determinants of progression across the pachychoroid subtype remain incompletely characterized, limiting risk stratification and follow-up strategies. Objective To evaluate progression, diagnostic transitions, and associated risk factors in eyes with pachychoroid subtype. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study included participants with pachychoroid subtype, defined by subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) of 300 µm or greater measured beneath the foveal center point, recruited at centers in Asia. Participants underwent standardized clinical assessment and multimodal imaging and were followed up for 2 years. The study was conducted between July 2020 and November 2023, and data analysis was performed from November 2023 to February 2026. Exposures Baseline pachychoroid subtype phenotype and imaging characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was diagnostic progression within the pachychoroid subtype spectrum over 2 years. Secondary outcomes included incident neovascularization, treatment initiations, and changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and SFCT. Results A total of 205 eyes from 125 participants (mean [SD] age, 59.0 [8.8] years; 32 female participants [25.6%]) completed 2-year follow-up. At baseline, 39 eyes had uncomplicated pachychoroid (UP), 102 had pachychoroid pigment epitheliopathy (PPE), 47 had central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), and 17 had pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV). Mean (SD) changes from baseline in BCVA and SFCT were 0.13 (0.18) logMAR (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/25) to 0.11 (0.24) (20/25; difference, −0.02 logMAR [approximately 1 letter]; 95% CI, −0.05 to 0.02; P = .33) and from 419 (83) µm to 424 (90) µm (difference, 6 µm; 95% CI, −5 to 16; P = .32), respectively. Eyes with CSCR and PNV had worse baseline BCVA compared to eyes with UP and PPE. Progression occurred in 15 eyes (7.3%; 95% CI, 4.5%-11.6%), including 7 eyes with neovascularization, all of which had shallow, irregular retinal pigment epithelium elevation at baseline, among 116 eyes at baseline with such elevation. Conclusions and Relevance In this study among a relatively small cohort of 4 different levels of pachychoroid subtype, progression to a worse level was infrequent, as was worsening of visual acuity or choroidal thickening. Neovascularization was unusual and occurred exclusively in eyes with shallow, irregular retinal pigment epithelium elevation, suggesting the importance of this imaging feature if confirmed in subsequent studies.
厚脉络膜亚型进展的发病率和危险因素
厚脉络膜亚型的发病率和进展的决定因素尚未完全确定,限制了风险分层和随访策略。目的评价厚脉络膜亚型眼的进展、诊断转变及相关危险因素。这项前瞻性、多中心、观察性队列研究纳入了厚脉络膜亚型的参与者,该亚型的定义是中央凹下脉络膜厚度(SFCT)在中央凹中心点下测量为300µm或更大,在亚洲的中心招募。参与者接受了标准化的临床评估和多模态成像,并随访2年。该研究于2020年7月至2023年11月进行,数据分析于2023年11月至2026年2月进行。基线厚脉络膜亚型表型和影像学特征。主要结果和测量主要结果是厚脉络膜亚型谱在2年内的诊断进展。次要结局包括新生血管的发生、治疗开始、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和SFCT的变化。结果125名受试者(平均[SD]年龄59.0[8.8]岁,女性32名[25.6%])共205只眼完成2年随访。基线时,39只眼为无并发症的厚脉络膜(UP), 102只眼为厚脉络膜色素上皮病(PPE), 47只眼为中枢性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病(CSCR), 17只眼为厚脉络膜新血管病(PNV)。与基线相比,BCVA和SFCT的平均(SD)变化分别为0.13 (0.18)logMAR(近似Snellen当量,20/25)至0.11(0.24)(20/25;差值为- 0.02 logMAR[约1个字母];95% CI, - 0.05至0.02;P = 0.33)和419(83)µm至424(90)µm(差值6µm; 95% CI, - 5至16;P = 0.32)。与UP和PPE患者相比,CSCR和PNV患者的基线BCVA更差。15只眼(7.3%;95% CI, 4.5%-11.6%)发生进展,其中7只眼新生血管形成,基线时视网膜色素上皮升高均为浅而不规则,116只眼基线时视网膜色素上皮升高。结论和相关性在这项研究中,在相对较小的4个不同水平的厚脉络膜亚型队列中,进展到更严重水平的病例很少,视力恶化或脉络膜增厚的病例也很少。新生血管的形成是不寻常的,并且只发生在浅的、不规则的视网膜色素上皮升高的眼睛中,如果在随后的研究中证实了这一影像学特征的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA ophthalmology
JAMA ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
340
期刊介绍: JAMA Ophthalmology, with a rich history of continuous publication since 1869, stands as a distinguished international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to ophthalmology and visual science. In 2019, the journal proudly commemorated 150 years of uninterrupted service to the field. As a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, a consortium renowned for its peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Ophthalmology upholds the highest standards of excellence in disseminating cutting-edge research and insights. Join us in celebrating our legacy and advancing the frontiers of ophthalmology and visual science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书