Graft quality assessment during machine perfusion in liver transplantation: a review of current evidence and emerging strategies.

Frontiers in transplantation Pub Date : 2026-07-28 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frtra.2026.1892796
Francisco Calderon Novoa, Franklin Gorospe, Nazia Selzner, Markus Selzner
{"title":"Graft quality assessment during machine perfusion in liver transplantation: a review of current evidence and emerging strategies.","authors":"Francisco Calderon Novoa, Franklin Gorospe, Nazia Selzner, Markus Selzner","doi":"10.3389/frtra.2026.1892796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Machine perfusion (MP) has transformed liver transplantation by enabling organ reconditioning, extending preservation times, and providing a dynamic platform for graft quality assessment. The ability to evaluate organ viability represents one of the most clinically impactful applications of this technology. As different perfusion modalities develop, distinct strategies have emerged to characterize graft viability. However, despite the growing evidence, significant heterogeneity remains in the parameters and thresholds employed, varying between each MP modality, as well as between centers. This review provides a comprehensive and critical synthesis of available evidence on viability assessment during each perfusion modality, and discusses promising new strategies in the race to the holy grail of viability assessment: prevention of both primary non-function (PNF) as well as the prediction of ischemic cholangiopathy (IC), so as to achieve tangible benefits in patient-centered outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":519976,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in transplantation","volume":"5 ","pages":"1892796"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13457723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2026.1892796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine perfusion (MP) has transformed liver transplantation by enabling organ reconditioning, extending preservation times, and providing a dynamic platform for graft quality assessment. The ability to evaluate organ viability represents one of the most clinically impactful applications of this technology. As different perfusion modalities develop, distinct strategies have emerged to characterize graft viability. However, despite the growing evidence, significant heterogeneity remains in the parameters and thresholds employed, varying between each MP modality, as well as between centers. This review provides a comprehensive and critical synthesis of available evidence on viability assessment during each perfusion modality, and discusses promising new strategies in the race to the holy grail of viability assessment: prevention of both primary non-function (PNF) as well as the prediction of ischemic cholangiopathy (IC), so as to achieve tangible benefits in patient-centered outcomes.

肝移植机器灌注期间移植物质量评估:当前证据和新策略的回顾。
机器灌注(MP)通过实现器官修复、延长保存时间和提供移植物质量评估的动态平台,改变了肝移植。评估器官活力的能力是这项技术在临床上最具影响力的应用之一。随着不同灌注方式的发展,出现了不同的策略来表征移植物的生存能力。然而,尽管证据越来越多,但所采用的参数和阈值仍然存在显著的异质性,在每个MP模式之间以及在中心之间都有所不同。本文综述了各种灌注模式下生存能力评估的现有证据,并讨论了有希望的新策略,以实现生存能力评估的终极目标:预防原发性无功能(PNF)和预测缺血性胆管病(IC),从而在以患者为中心的结果中获得切实的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书