Valid when valued: A community-engaged framework and toolkit to improve identification of autistic people's motor difficulties in research and practice.

Haylie L Miller, Priscila M Tamplain, Miri Tal-Saban, Stefania Zoia, Anna L Barnett, Sheila E Henderson
{"title":"Valid when valued: A community-engaged framework and toolkit to improve identification of autistic people's motor difficulties in research and practice.","authors":"Haylie L Miller, Priscila M Tamplain, Miri Tal-Saban, Stefania Zoia, Anna L Barnett, Sheila E Henderson","doi":"10.1177/25739581261474754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many autistic people experience clinically-significant motor differences that pose lifelong physical health risks including physical inactivity, cardiometabolic disease, falls and injuries, and chronic pain. These differences amplify existing cognitive and social-emotional features of autism and limit daily living skills, which in turn negatively impacts mental health and participation. Yet, professionals often overlook or mischaracterize autistic people's motor difficulties, in part because non-motor factors can affect assessment outcomes. Most standardized motor assessments presume typical communication, sensory processing, regulation, and tolerance of unfamiliar testing environments, leading to construct-irrelevant variance and potential misinterpretation of results. This risk increases when examiners lack autism-specific experience or use rigid administration practices without appropriate adaptation. Adopting a neurodiversity-affirming framework improves validity, equity, and uptake of motor assessment across research, education, and clinical contexts. Here, we present an Adapted Motor Assessment Toolkit for Autism with implementation examples grounded in the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Third Edition. An interdisciplinary team of clinicians and researchers developed and refined the toolkit in partnership with autistic people and parents of autistic children. The toolkit enables preservation of core task demands and scoring while adapting assessment practices to support accessibility and improve validity of results. Adaptations span five domains: pre-assessment preparation, sensory supports, procedural adaptations, communication supports, and motivation/engagement. The toolkit helps examiners to identify support needs, implementing adaptations, interpreting results, and determining whether normative comparisons remain appropriate. Neurodiversity-affirming assessment practices enable earlier identification of motor differences, inclusion of more diverse participants in research, and tailored intervention and prevention planning to advance physical health equity across the lifespan.</p>","PeriodicalId":72338,"journal":{"name":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13458965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25739581261474754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many autistic people experience clinically-significant motor differences that pose lifelong physical health risks including physical inactivity, cardiometabolic disease, falls and injuries, and chronic pain. These differences amplify existing cognitive and social-emotional features of autism and limit daily living skills, which in turn negatively impacts mental health and participation. Yet, professionals often overlook or mischaracterize autistic people's motor difficulties, in part because non-motor factors can affect assessment outcomes. Most standardized motor assessments presume typical communication, sensory processing, regulation, and tolerance of unfamiliar testing environments, leading to construct-irrelevant variance and potential misinterpretation of results. This risk increases when examiners lack autism-specific experience or use rigid administration practices without appropriate adaptation. Adopting a neurodiversity-affirming framework improves validity, equity, and uptake of motor assessment across research, education, and clinical contexts. Here, we present an Adapted Motor Assessment Toolkit for Autism with implementation examples grounded in the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Third Edition. An interdisciplinary team of clinicians and researchers developed and refined the toolkit in partnership with autistic people and parents of autistic children. The toolkit enables preservation of core task demands and scoring while adapting assessment practices to support accessibility and improve validity of results. Adaptations span five domains: pre-assessment preparation, sensory supports, procedural adaptations, communication supports, and motivation/engagement. The toolkit helps examiners to identify support needs, implementing adaptations, interpreting results, and determining whether normative comparisons remain appropriate. Neurodiversity-affirming assessment practices enable earlier identification of motor differences, inclusion of more diverse participants in research, and tailored intervention and prevention planning to advance physical health equity across the lifespan.

有价值时有效:一个社区参与的框架和工具包,在研究和实践中提高对自闭症患者运动困难的识别。
许多自闭症患者会经历临床上显著的运动差异,这些差异会带来终生的身体健康风险,包括缺乏运动、心脏代谢疾病、跌倒和受伤以及慢性疼痛。这些差异放大了自闭症现有的认知和社会情感特征,限制了日常生活技能,进而对心理健康和参与产生负面影响。然而,专业人士经常忽视或错误地描述自闭症患者的运动障碍,部分原因是非运动因素会影响评估结果。大多数标准化的运动评估都假定典型的沟通、感觉处理、调节和对不熟悉测试环境的容忍,从而导致与构建无关的差异和对结果的潜在误解。当审查员缺乏自闭症的具体经验或使用严格的管理实践而没有适当的适应时,这种风险会增加。采用神经多样性确认框架可以提高研究、教育和临床环境中运动评估的有效性、公平性和吸收性。在这里,我们提出了一个自闭症的适应性运动评估工具包,其中包括基于儿童运动评估电池的实施示例-第三版。一个由临床医生和研究人员组成的跨学科团队与自闭症患者和自闭症儿童的父母合作,开发并完善了该工具包。该工具包支持保留核心任务需求和评分,同时调整评估实践以支持可访问性并提高结果的有效性。适应跨越五个领域:预评估准备、感官支持、程序适应、沟通支持和动机/参与。该工具包帮助审查员识别支持需求、实现调整、解释结果,并确定规范性比较是否仍然合适。神经多样性确认评估实践能够更早地识别运动差异,在研究中纳入更多不同的参与者,并制定量身定制的干预和预防计划,以促进整个生命周期的身体健康公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书