Sohail R Daulat, Daniel Colome, Marisa DiMarzio, Jennifer Durphy, Julie G Pilitsis
{"title":"Natural Language Processing to Predict Deep Brain Stimulation Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease.","authors":"Sohail R Daulat, Daniel Colome, Marisa DiMarzio, Jennifer Durphy, Julie G Pilitsis","doi":"10.1159/sfn/aeuag003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS Part III) is often not obtained postoperatively in routine clinical practice, limiting objective assessment of treatment response following deep brain stimulation (DBS). We examine whether natural language processing (NLP) offers a potential approach to use narrative clinical documentation to predict motor outcomes and evaluate therapeutic responsiveness when formal postoperative scoring is unavailable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Neurology notes and UPDRS Part III assessments were obtained from 25 patients with Parkinson's disease pre- and postoperatively. DBS response was defined as percent improvement in UPDRS Part III from the preoperative OFF-medication state to the postoperative DBS-ON/medication-ON assessment. We assessed whether UPDRS Part III scores could be predicted from clinic notes and whether improvement could be predicted from preoperative notes. Four NLP approaches were evaluated: TFIDF with linear models, BERT-base, ClinicalBERT, and Bio-ClinicalBERT embeddings. Models were assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation, with performance evaluated using mean absolute error, coefficient of determination (R2), Spearman correlation, and area under the ROC curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All approaches differentiated preoperative notes from postoperative notes. The TFIDF model demonstrated moderate accuracy at predicting UPDRS Part III total scores and percentage change. Several individual motor subscores demonstrated significant positive correlations between predicted and observed values, but only neck rigidity remained signifcant after BH-FDR correction (p=0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NLP applied to routine DBS notes reliably distinguishes pre- from postoperative documentation and recovers a narrow set of consistently documented features (rigidity neck being a genuine positive signal). NLP-derived outputs may complement, but should not replace, formal UPDRS Part III assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/sfn/aeuag003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS Part III) is often not obtained postoperatively in routine clinical practice, limiting objective assessment of treatment response following deep brain stimulation (DBS). We examine whether natural language processing (NLP) offers a potential approach to use narrative clinical documentation to predict motor outcomes and evaluate therapeutic responsiveness when formal postoperative scoring is unavailable.
Methods: Neurology notes and UPDRS Part III assessments were obtained from 25 patients with Parkinson's disease pre- and postoperatively. DBS response was defined as percent improvement in UPDRS Part III from the preoperative OFF-medication state to the postoperative DBS-ON/medication-ON assessment. We assessed whether UPDRS Part III scores could be predicted from clinic notes and whether improvement could be predicted from preoperative notes. Four NLP approaches were evaluated: TFIDF with linear models, BERT-base, ClinicalBERT, and Bio-ClinicalBERT embeddings. Models were assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation, with performance evaluated using mean absolute error, coefficient of determination (R2), Spearman correlation, and area under the ROC curve.
Results: All approaches differentiated preoperative notes from postoperative notes. The TFIDF model demonstrated moderate accuracy at predicting UPDRS Part III total scores and percentage change. Several individual motor subscores demonstrated significant positive correlations between predicted and observed values, but only neck rigidity remained signifcant after BH-FDR correction (p=0.04).
Conclusion: NLP applied to routine DBS notes reliably distinguishes pre- from postoperative documentation and recovers a narrow set of consistently documented features (rigidity neck being a genuine positive signal). NLP-derived outputs may complement, but should not replace, formal UPDRS Part III assessment.
在常规临床实践中,帕金森病统一评定量表(UPDRS Part III)往往无法在术后获得,这限制了对深部脑刺激(DBS)后治疗反应的客观评估。当无法获得正式的术后评分时,自然语言处理(NLP)提供了一种使用叙述性临床文件来预测运动结果和评估治疗反应性的潜在方法。方法对25例帕金森病(PD)患者进行术前和术后神经学记录和UPDRS第三部分评估。DBS反应被定义为UPDRS第三部分从术前OFF-medication状态到术后DBS/药物ON评估的改善百分比。我们评估了UPDRS第三部分评分是否可以从临床记录中预测,以及是否可以从术前记录中预测改善。评估了四种NLP方法:使用线性模型的TF-IDF、BERT-base、ClinicalBERT和Bio-ClinicalBERT嵌入。采用留一交叉验证对模型进行评估,并使用平均绝对误差、决定系数(R²)、Spearman相关和ROC曲线下面积来评估模型的性能。结果所有入路均区分了术前笔记和术后笔记。TF-IDF模型在预测UPDRS第三部分总分和百分比变化方面表现出中等的准确性。几个单独的运动评分在预测值和观察值之间显示出显著的相关性,包括震颤、僵硬和肢体敏捷性测量。震颤显性和僵硬-运动迟缓表型与较低的预测误差相关,而PIGD表型在预测术后运动改善时显示出更高的误差。结论这些发现支持在DBS常规临床文献中使用NLP检测信号的可行性,但它们应被视为探索性的。nlp衍生的产出可以补充,但不应取代正式的UPDRS-III评估。
期刊介绍:
''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' provides a single source for the reader to keep abreast of developments in the most rapidly advancing subspecialty within neurosurgery. Technological advances in computer-assisted surgery, robotics, imaging and neurophysiology are being applied to clinical problems with ever-increasing rapidity in stereotaxis more than any other field, providing opportunities for new approaches to surgical and radiotherapeutic management of diseases of the brain, spinal cord, and spine. Issues feature advances in the use of deep-brain stimulation, imaging-guided techniques in stereotactic biopsy and craniotomy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and stereotactically implanted and guided radiotherapeutics and biologicals in the treatment of functional and movement disorders, brain tumors, and other diseases of the brain. Background information from basic science laboratories related to such clinical advances provides the reader with an overall perspective of this field. Proceedings and abstracts from many of the key international meetings furnish an overview of this specialty available nowhere else. ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' meets the information needs of both investigators and clinicians in this rapidly advancing field.