{"title":"Evaluation of Techniques and Utility of Liver Parenchymal Transection Using Robotic Ultrasonic Shears (da Vinci System) in Robot-Assisted Hepatectomy.","authors":"Daisuke Satoh, Ryuichi Yoshida, Masashi Yoshimoto, Hiroaki Mashima, Hiroyoshi Matsukawa","doi":"10.1177/15533506261477024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeLiver transection techniques in robotic liver resection (RLR) have not yet been standardized. We introduced robotic ultrasonic shears (longitudinal clustered shears [LCS]); however, the lack of an articulating joint limits operative angles. To overcome this, we implemented strategic surgical maneuvers. This study aimed to evaluate the liver transection efficiency of the robotic ultrasonic shears in RLR.MethodsFifty-three patients who underwent RLR concurrently between 2023 and 2025 were retrospectively analyzed (LCS group, n = 23; conventional [CONV] group using Maryland bipolar forceps, n = 30). We compared liver transection speed, total ischemia time, and short-term outcomes.ResultsDespite a lower proportion of low-difficulty cases in the LCS group, it demonstrated significantly higher transection speed (median: 0.71 vs 0.38 cm<sup>2</sup>/min, <i>P</i> < .001) and shorter total ischemia time (63 vs 78 min, <i>P</i> = .011). Postoperative albumin levels on days 3 and 5 were significantly higher (<i>P</i> = .004), and the complication rate (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II) was significantly lower (8.7% vs 30.0%, <i>P</i> = .049) in the LCS group. Multivariate analysis identified the use of LCS (<i>P</i> = .003) as an independent predictor of higher transection speed. Exploratory subgroup analyses confirmed that the LCS group had significantly higher transection speed in non-anatomical resections (<i>P</i> < .001) and significantly shorter ischemia time in anatomical resections (<i>P</i> = .021), although the higher transection speed in anatomical resections did not reach statistical significance.ConclusionsRobotic ultrasonic shears with optimized maneuvers significantly improve transection speed and reduce ischemia time, enhancing the efficiency of RLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506261477024"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506261477024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeLiver transection techniques in robotic liver resection (RLR) have not yet been standardized. We introduced robotic ultrasonic shears (longitudinal clustered shears [LCS]); however, the lack of an articulating joint limits operative angles. To overcome this, we implemented strategic surgical maneuvers. This study aimed to evaluate the liver transection efficiency of the robotic ultrasonic shears in RLR.MethodsFifty-three patients who underwent RLR concurrently between 2023 and 2025 were retrospectively analyzed (LCS group, n = 23; conventional [CONV] group using Maryland bipolar forceps, n = 30). We compared liver transection speed, total ischemia time, and short-term outcomes.ResultsDespite a lower proportion of low-difficulty cases in the LCS group, it demonstrated significantly higher transection speed (median: 0.71 vs 0.38 cm2/min, P < .001) and shorter total ischemia time (63 vs 78 min, P = .011). Postoperative albumin levels on days 3 and 5 were significantly higher (P = .004), and the complication rate (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II) was significantly lower (8.7% vs 30.0%, P = .049) in the LCS group. Multivariate analysis identified the use of LCS (P = .003) as an independent predictor of higher transection speed. Exploratory subgroup analyses confirmed that the LCS group had significantly higher transection speed in non-anatomical resections (P < .001) and significantly shorter ischemia time in anatomical resections (P = .021), although the higher transection speed in anatomical resections did not reach statistical significance.ConclusionsRobotic ultrasonic shears with optimized maneuvers significantly improve transection speed and reduce ischemia time, enhancing the efficiency of RLR.
目的机器人肝切除术(RLR)中的肝脏横断技术尚未标准化。我们介绍了机器人超声波剪切机(纵向集群剪切机[LCS]);然而,关节的缺乏限制了手术角度。为了克服这个问题,我们实施了战略性的外科手术。本研究旨在评估机器人超声切割器在RLR中的肝脏横断效率。方法回顾性分析2023年至2025年期间53例同时行RLR的患者(LCS组,n = 23;常规[CONV]组,n = 30)。我们比较了肝横断速度、总缺血时间和短期预后。结果LCS组低困难病例比例较低,但其横断速度显著提高(中位数:0.71 vs 0.38 cm2/min, P < 0.001),总缺血时间显著缩短(63 vs 78 min, P = 0.011)。LCS组术后第3、5天白蛋白水平显著高于对照组(P = 0.004),并发症发生率(Clavien-Dindo分级≥II)显著低于对照组(8.7% vs 30.0%, P = 0.049)。多变量分析确定LCS的使用(P = 0.003)是较高横断速度的独立预测因子。探索性亚组分析证实,LCS组非解剖切除的横断速度显著提高(P < 0.001),解剖切除的缺血时间显著缩短(P = 0.021),但解剖切除的横断速度较高,差异无统计学意义。结论优化后的机器人超声剪切机可显著提高剪切速度,缩短缺血时间,提高RLR效率。
期刊介绍:
Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).