Evaluation of Techniques and Utility of Liver Parenchymal Transection Using Robotic Ultrasonic Shears (da Vinci System) in Robot-Assisted Hepatectomy.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Daisuke Satoh, Ryuichi Yoshida, Masashi Yoshimoto, Hiroaki Mashima, Hiroyoshi Matsukawa
{"title":"Evaluation of Techniques and Utility of Liver Parenchymal Transection Using Robotic Ultrasonic Shears (da Vinci System) in Robot-Assisted Hepatectomy.","authors":"Daisuke Satoh, Ryuichi Yoshida, Masashi Yoshimoto, Hiroaki Mashima, Hiroyoshi Matsukawa","doi":"10.1177/15533506261477024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeLiver transection techniques in robotic liver resection (RLR) have not yet been standardized. We introduced robotic ultrasonic shears (longitudinal clustered shears [LCS]); however, the lack of an articulating joint limits operative angles. To overcome this, we implemented strategic surgical maneuvers. This study aimed to evaluate the liver transection efficiency of the robotic ultrasonic shears in RLR.MethodsFifty-three patients who underwent RLR concurrently between 2023 and 2025 were retrospectively analyzed (LCS group, n = 23; conventional [CONV] group using Maryland bipolar forceps, n = 30). We compared liver transection speed, total ischemia time, and short-term outcomes.ResultsDespite a lower proportion of low-difficulty cases in the LCS group, it demonstrated significantly higher transection speed (median: 0.71 vs 0.38 cm<sup>2</sup>/min, <i>P</i> < .001) and shorter total ischemia time (63 vs 78 min, <i>P</i> = .011). Postoperative albumin levels on days 3 and 5 were significantly higher (<i>P</i> = .004), and the complication rate (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II) was significantly lower (8.7% vs 30.0%, <i>P</i> = .049) in the LCS group. Multivariate analysis identified the use of LCS (<i>P</i> = .003) as an independent predictor of higher transection speed. Exploratory subgroup analyses confirmed that the LCS group had significantly higher transection speed in non-anatomical resections (<i>P</i> < .001) and significantly shorter ischemia time in anatomical resections (<i>P</i> = .021), although the higher transection speed in anatomical resections did not reach statistical significance.ConclusionsRobotic ultrasonic shears with optimized maneuvers significantly improve transection speed and reduce ischemia time, enhancing the efficiency of RLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506261477024"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506261477024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeLiver transection techniques in robotic liver resection (RLR) have not yet been standardized. We introduced robotic ultrasonic shears (longitudinal clustered shears [LCS]); however, the lack of an articulating joint limits operative angles. To overcome this, we implemented strategic surgical maneuvers. This study aimed to evaluate the liver transection efficiency of the robotic ultrasonic shears in RLR.MethodsFifty-three patients who underwent RLR concurrently between 2023 and 2025 were retrospectively analyzed (LCS group, n = 23; conventional [CONV] group using Maryland bipolar forceps, n = 30). We compared liver transection speed, total ischemia time, and short-term outcomes.ResultsDespite a lower proportion of low-difficulty cases in the LCS group, it demonstrated significantly higher transection speed (median: 0.71 vs 0.38 cm2/min, P < .001) and shorter total ischemia time (63 vs 78 min, P = .011). Postoperative albumin levels on days 3 and 5 were significantly higher (P = .004), and the complication rate (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II) was significantly lower (8.7% vs 30.0%, P = .049) in the LCS group. Multivariate analysis identified the use of LCS (P = .003) as an independent predictor of higher transection speed. Exploratory subgroup analyses confirmed that the LCS group had significantly higher transection speed in non-anatomical resections (P < .001) and significantly shorter ischemia time in anatomical resections (P = .021), although the higher transection speed in anatomical resections did not reach statistical significance.ConclusionsRobotic ultrasonic shears with optimized maneuvers significantly improve transection speed and reduce ischemia time, enhancing the efficiency of RLR.

机器人辅助肝切除术中机器人超声切割机(达芬奇系统)肝实质切断术的技术与应用评价。
目的机器人肝切除术(RLR)中的肝脏横断技术尚未标准化。我们介绍了机器人超声波剪切机(纵向集群剪切机[LCS]);然而,关节的缺乏限制了手术角度。为了克服这个问题,我们实施了战略性的外科手术。本研究旨在评估机器人超声切割器在RLR中的肝脏横断效率。方法回顾性分析2023年至2025年期间53例同时行RLR的患者(LCS组,n = 23;常规[CONV]组,n = 30)。我们比较了肝横断速度、总缺血时间和短期预后。结果LCS组低困难病例比例较低,但其横断速度显著提高(中位数:0.71 vs 0.38 cm2/min, P < 0.001),总缺血时间显著缩短(63 vs 78 min, P = 0.011)。LCS组术后第3、5天白蛋白水平显著高于对照组(P = 0.004),并发症发生率(Clavien-Dindo分级≥II)显著低于对照组(8.7% vs 30.0%, P = 0.049)。多变量分析确定LCS的使用(P = 0.003)是较高横断速度的独立预测因子。探索性亚组分析证实,LCS组非解剖切除的横断速度显著提高(P < 0.001),解剖切除的缺血时间显著缩短(P = 0.021),但解剖切除的横断速度较高,差异无统计学意义。结论优化后的机器人超声剪切机可显著提高剪切速度,缩短缺血时间,提高RLR效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书