Does adult lumbar scoliosis affect spine T-score accuracy in osteoporosis diagnosis?-a cross-sectional study of adults aged 50 years and older.

IF 2.3 Q1 Medicine
Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2026-07-31 Epub Date: 2026-07-09 DOI:10.21037/jss-2026-0071
Gabriel Liu, Seth Ian Sim, Bo Xiang Bryan Neo, Chan Yiong Huak, Wong Hee-Kit, Jun-Hao Tan
{"title":"Does adult lumbar scoliosis affect spine T-score accuracy in osteoporosis diagnosis?-a cross-sectional study of adults aged 50 years and older.","authors":"Gabriel Liu, Seth Ian Sim, Bo Xiang Bryan Neo, Chan Yiong Huak, Wong Hee-Kit, Jun-Hao Tan","doi":"10.21037/jss-2026-0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the gold standard for assessing bone mineral density (BMD) and diagnosing osteoporosis (T-score ≤-2.5). Lumbar spine T-scores are often used when hip measurements are unavailable or unreliable. However, degenerative spinal changes can artifactually elevate lumbar spine BMD, leading to discordance between spine and hip T-scores and potential misclassification of osteoporosis. The impact of adult degenerative scoliosis on this discordance remains poorly defined. This study evaluates the association between lumbar scoliosis and spine-hip T-score discordance in adults ≥50 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study included consecutive adults ≥50 years who underwent DEXA scans over a 4-year period at a university hospital. Patients with secondary causes of osteoporosis were excluded. Participants were grouped by presence or absence of scoliosis. Spine and hip T-scores were recorded and classified as no, minor, or major discordance. No discordance indicated no grade difference between sites. Minor discordance referred to a one-grade difference (normal <i>vs.</i> osteopenia or osteopenia <i>vs.</i> osteoporosis). Major discordance referred to a two-grade difference (normal <i>vs.</i> osteoporosis).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6,969 patients were included; 91.6% were female with a mean age of 60.6 years. Scoliosis was present in 637 patients (9.1%), with a mean Cobb angle of 17° (range, 10-66°). Spine T-scores classified more patients as normal (43.0% <i>vs.</i> 31.1%) and fewer as osteopenic (41.5% <i>vs.</i> 48.9%) or osteoporotic (15.5% <i>vs.</i> 19.1%) compared with hip T-scores. Patients with scoliosis were older (67 <i>vs.</i> 60 years, P<0.001) and more likely female (94% <i>vs.</i> 91%, P<0.001). Spine-hip discordance was more frequent in scoliosis patients, with minor discordance in 44.1% <i>vs.</i> 39.0% and major discordance in 5.0% <i>vs.</i> 2.8% of non-scoliosis patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lumbar scoliosis is associated with increased spine-hip T-score discordance, limiting the reliability of lumbar spine measurements in osteoporosis assessment. These effects are more pronounced in older adults and females. Clinicians should interpret spine T-scores cautiously in the presence of scoliosis and prioritise hip measurements when assessing bone health or planning interventions where bone quality is critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"12 7","pages":"114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13458824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-2026-0071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the gold standard for assessing bone mineral density (BMD) and diagnosing osteoporosis (T-score ≤-2.5). Lumbar spine T-scores are often used when hip measurements are unavailable or unreliable. However, degenerative spinal changes can artifactually elevate lumbar spine BMD, leading to discordance between spine and hip T-scores and potential misclassification of osteoporosis. The impact of adult degenerative scoliosis on this discordance remains poorly defined. This study evaluates the association between lumbar scoliosis and spine-hip T-score discordance in adults ≥50 years.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study included consecutive adults ≥50 years who underwent DEXA scans over a 4-year period at a university hospital. Patients with secondary causes of osteoporosis were excluded. Participants were grouped by presence or absence of scoliosis. Spine and hip T-scores were recorded and classified as no, minor, or major discordance. No discordance indicated no grade difference between sites. Minor discordance referred to a one-grade difference (normal vs. osteopenia or osteopenia vs. osteoporosis). Major discordance referred to a two-grade difference (normal vs. osteoporosis).

Results: A total of 6,969 patients were included; 91.6% were female with a mean age of 60.6 years. Scoliosis was present in 637 patients (9.1%), with a mean Cobb angle of 17° (range, 10-66°). Spine T-scores classified more patients as normal (43.0% vs. 31.1%) and fewer as osteopenic (41.5% vs. 48.9%) or osteoporotic (15.5% vs. 19.1%) compared with hip T-scores. Patients with scoliosis were older (67 vs. 60 years, P<0.001) and more likely female (94% vs. 91%, P<0.001). Spine-hip discordance was more frequent in scoliosis patients, with minor discordance in 44.1% vs. 39.0% and major discordance in 5.0% vs. 2.8% of non-scoliosis patients.

Conclusions: Lumbar scoliosis is associated with increased spine-hip T-score discordance, limiting the reliability of lumbar spine measurements in osteoporosis assessment. These effects are more pronounced in older adults and females. Clinicians should interpret spine T-scores cautiously in the presence of scoliosis and prioritise hip measurements when assessing bone health or planning interventions where bone quality is critical.

成人腰椎侧凸是否影响脊柱t评分在骨质疏松症诊断中的准确性?-对50岁及以上成年人的横断面研究。
背景:双能x线骨密度测定法(DEXA)是评估骨密度(BMD)和诊断骨质疏松症(t评分≤-2.5)的金标准。当无法获得或不可靠的髋部测量时,通常使用腰椎t评分。然而,脊柱退行性改变可人为地提高腰椎骨密度,导致脊柱和髋关节t评分不一致,并可能导致骨质疏松症的错误分类。成人退行性脊柱侧凸对这种不一致的影响仍不明确。本研究评估≥50岁成人腰椎侧凸与脊柱-髋关节t评分不一致之间的关系。方法:一项回顾性横断面研究包括≥50岁的连续成年人,他们在大学医院接受了4年的DEXA扫描。排除继发性骨质疏松患者。参与者根据有无脊柱侧凸进行分组。记录脊柱和髋关节t评分,并将其分为无、轻微或严重不一致。没有不一致表明站点之间没有等级差异。轻微不一致指的是一级差异(正常与骨质减少或骨质减少与骨质疏松)。主要不一致指的是两级差异(正常与骨质疏松)。结果:共纳入6969例患者;91.6%为女性,平均年龄60.6岁。637例(9.1%)患者出现脊柱侧凸,平均Cobb角为17°(范围10-66°)。与髋关节t评分相比,脊柱t评分将更多的患者分类为正常(43.0%比31.1%),而将更少的患者分类为骨质减少(41.5%比48.9%)或骨质疏松(15.5%比19.1%)。脊柱侧凸患者年龄较大(67岁vs. 60岁,Pvs. 91%, Pvs. 39.0%),非脊柱侧凸患者的主要不一致为5.0% vs. 2.8%。结论:腰椎侧凸与脊柱-髋关节t评分不一致增加有关,限制了腰椎测量在骨质疏松评估中的可靠性。这些影响在老年人和女性中更为明显。临床医生在出现脊柱侧凸时应谨慎解释脊柱t评分,在评估骨骼健康或计划骨骼质量至关重要的干预措施时应优先考虑髋关节测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书