Assessment Tools for Student Telehealth Competency: A Scoping Review.

IF 2
Kate Bridgman, Shane Erickson, Tim Burke, Annie Hill, Carol McKinstry
{"title":"Assessment Tools for Student Telehealth Competency: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Kate Bridgman, Shane Erickson, Tim Burke, Annie Hill, Carol McKinstry","doi":"10.1177/15305627261473406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Telehealth is widely used by health professionals and students to deliver services in various settings. Health students need to acquire telehealth competencies prior to and during placement for safe delivery and competent practice. Therefore, understanding which student telehealth competencies have been assessed following a learning activity and what measures are used to do so in the literature is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was undertaken to identify (1) existing tools that measure telehealth competencies in students undertaking synchronous telehealth learning activities and (2) the telehealth competencies that these tools measure. Relevant electronic databases were searched. Titles and abstracts were independently reviewed by two researchers and included if published between 1995 and 2025, involved synchronous telehealth activities with real or simulated patients, and student telehealth competencies were assessed. Data were extracted and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven studies met inclusion criteria, with 82% conducted in the United States. Forty-nine studies (86%) used a case series research design. Students were from 10 health disciplines. Most studies (91%) used video-based telehealth activities. Almost three quarters of studies included simulation activities to facilitate telehealth learning. Outcome measures to evaluate student telehealth competencies were largely developed for individual studies, and most did not have established psychometric properties. Telehealth competencies assessed were in three areas: professional competencies, clinical competencies, and telehealth-specific competencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simulation is a commonly utilized learning activity to develop student telehealth competencies. There is a lack of specifically designed tools to assess student telehealth competencies. Further research is needed to develop robust assessment tools with established psychometric properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"1092-1110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15305627261473406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Telehealth is widely used by health professionals and students to deliver services in various settings. Health students need to acquire telehealth competencies prior to and during placement for safe delivery and competent practice. Therefore, understanding which student telehealth competencies have been assessed following a learning activity and what measures are used to do so in the literature is needed.

Methods: A scoping review was undertaken to identify (1) existing tools that measure telehealth competencies in students undertaking synchronous telehealth learning activities and (2) the telehealth competencies that these tools measure. Relevant electronic databases were searched. Titles and abstracts were independently reviewed by two researchers and included if published between 1995 and 2025, involved synchronous telehealth activities with real or simulated patients, and student telehealth competencies were assessed. Data were extracted and analyzed.

Results: Fifty-seven studies met inclusion criteria, with 82% conducted in the United States. Forty-nine studies (86%) used a case series research design. Students were from 10 health disciplines. Most studies (91%) used video-based telehealth activities. Almost three quarters of studies included simulation activities to facilitate telehealth learning. Outcome measures to evaluate student telehealth competencies were largely developed for individual studies, and most did not have established psychometric properties. Telehealth competencies assessed were in three areas: professional competencies, clinical competencies, and telehealth-specific competencies.

Conclusion: Simulation is a commonly utilized learning activity to develop student telehealth competencies. There is a lack of specifically designed tools to assess student telehealth competencies. Further research is needed to develop robust assessment tools with established psychometric properties.

学生远程医疗能力的评估工具:范围审查。
远程医疗被卫生专业人员和学生广泛用于在各种环境中提供服务。卫生专业的学生需要在实习前和实习期间获得远程医疗能力,以确保安全分娩和有能力的实践。因此,需要了解哪些学生的远程医疗能力在学习活动后进行了评估,以及在文献中使用了哪些措施。方法:进行范围审查,以确定(1)现有的工具,测量远程医疗能力的学生进行同步远程医疗学习活动和(2)这些工具测量的远程医疗能力。检索了相关电子数据库。题目和摘要由两名研究人员独立审查,如果在1995年至2025年之间发表,则纳入其中,涉及与真实或模拟患者进行同步远程保健活动,并评估学生的远程保健能力。提取数据并进行分析。结果:57项研究符合纳入标准,其中82%在美国进行。49项研究(86%)采用了案例系列研究设计。学生来自10个卫生学科。大多数研究(91%)使用基于视频的远程保健活动。近四分之三的研究包括模拟活动,以促进远程保健学习。评估学生远程医疗能力的结果措施主要是为个人研究开发的,而且大多数没有确定的心理测量特性。评估的远程保健能力分为三个方面:专业能力、临床能力和远程保健特定能力。结论:模拟是培养学生远程医疗能力的常用学习方式。缺乏专门设计的工具来评估学生的远程保健能力。需要进一步的研究来开发具有既定心理测量特性的可靠评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书