Retinal Artery Occlusion and Incident Dementia in the All of Us Research Program: Detection Bias Calibration with Prespecified Negative-Control Outcomes.

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of clinical medicine research Pub Date : 2026-07-31 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.14740/jocmr6628
Meet Popatbhai Kachhadia, Piyush Puri, Usmaan Topiwala, Juber D Shaikh, Gurnoor Gill, Shailesh Gupta, Michelle Byrus, Harshal A Sanghvi
{"title":"Retinal Artery Occlusion and Incident Dementia in the All of Us Research Program: Detection Bias Calibration with Prespecified Negative-Control Outcomes.","authors":"Meet Popatbhai Kachhadia, Piyush Puri, Usmaan Topiwala, Juber D Shaikh, Gurnoor Gill, Shailesh Gupta, Michelle Byrus, Harshal A Sanghvi","doi":"10.14740/jocmr6628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) shares vascular pathophysiology with cerebrovascular disease, and its relationship to incident dementia remains unsettled. Reported associations may reflect shared vascular pathology, differential ascertainment along the intensive workup pathways that RAO patients enter, or both. No prior study has calibrated RAO-dementia estimates against prespecified negative-control outcomes spanning distinct ascertainment pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 129,279 All of Us participants aged 50 years or older and free of prevalent dementia (controlled-tier release R2024Q3R9, OMOP common data model), strict RAO was defined by seven verified SNOMED concept identifiers (n = 339). Incident dementia required two or more codes at least 30 days apart (Wilkinson algorithm), with prespecified vascular and Alzheimer subtypes. Cox models used age as timescale with left truncation and time-varying exposure; 1:5 propensity-score matching was the primary confounder-adjusted analysis. Cataract, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), and inguinal hernia were prespecified negative controls for ophthalmology, neurology, and general-contact pathways.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,506 incident dementia events. RAO was not associated with all-cause dementia (unmatched hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-1.64; matched HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.72-2.47; 10 exposed events). The vascular dementia estimate remained elevated but imprecise (unmatched HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.02-3.66; matched HR 1.81, 95% CI 0.66-4.94; 3 exposed events). Cataract was elevated (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.45-2.42), whereas BPPV (HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.90-1.79) and hernia (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.68-1.78) were not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no evidence that RAO is independently associated with incident dementia, replicating a large European null finding in a diverse United States cohort. The cohort was underpowered to exclude clinically meaningful effects, particularly for vascular dementia. Detection bias in this dataset was demonstrably pathway-specific, but same-pathway calibration accounts for only part of the residual vascular dementia estimate.</p>","PeriodicalId":94329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical medicine research","volume":"18 7","pages":"489-495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13456938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical medicine research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr6628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) shares vascular pathophysiology with cerebrovascular disease, and its relationship to incident dementia remains unsettled. Reported associations may reflect shared vascular pathology, differential ascertainment along the intensive workup pathways that RAO patients enter, or both. No prior study has calibrated RAO-dementia estimates against prespecified negative-control outcomes spanning distinct ascertainment pathways.

Methods: Among 129,279 All of Us participants aged 50 years or older and free of prevalent dementia (controlled-tier release R2024Q3R9, OMOP common data model), strict RAO was defined by seven verified SNOMED concept identifiers (n = 339). Incident dementia required two or more codes at least 30 days apart (Wilkinson algorithm), with prespecified vascular and Alzheimer subtypes. Cox models used age as timescale with left truncation and time-varying exposure; 1:5 propensity-score matching was the primary confounder-adjusted analysis. Cataract, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), and inguinal hernia were prespecified negative controls for ophthalmology, neurology, and general-contact pathways.

Results: There were 1,506 incident dementia events. RAO was not associated with all-cause dementia (unmatched hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-1.64; matched HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.72-2.47; 10 exposed events). The vascular dementia estimate remained elevated but imprecise (unmatched HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.02-3.66; matched HR 1.81, 95% CI 0.66-4.94; 3 exposed events). Cataract was elevated (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.45-2.42), whereas BPPV (HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.90-1.79) and hernia (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.68-1.78) were not.

Conclusions: We found no evidence that RAO is independently associated with incident dementia, replicating a large European null finding in a diverse United States cohort. The cohort was underpowered to exclude clinically meaningful effects, particularly for vascular dementia. Detection bias in this dataset was demonstrably pathway-specific, but same-pathway calibration accounts for only part of the residual vascular dementia estimate.

视网膜动脉闭塞和我们所有人的痴呆研究项目:预先指定的负控制结果的检测偏差校准。
背景:视网膜动脉闭塞(RAO)与脑血管疾病具有相同的血管病理生理,其与痴呆的关系尚不清楚。报告的关联可能反映了共同的血管病理,RAO患者进入的强化检查路径的差异确定,或两者兼而有之。之前没有研究针对跨越不同确定途径的预先指定的阴性对照结果校准rao -痴呆估计。方法:在129,279名年龄在50岁及以上、无流行痴呆的All Us参与者(对照层发布R2024Q3R9, OMOP通用数据模型)中,通过7个经过验证的SNOMED概念标识符(n = 339)定义严格的RAO。偶发性痴呆需要至少间隔30天的两个或更多代码(Wilkinson算法),并预先指定血管和阿尔茨海默病亚型。Cox模型以年龄为时间尺度,左截断,暴露时变;1:5倾向得分匹配是主要的混杂校正分析。白内障、良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)和腹股沟疝是预先指定的眼科、神经病学和一般接触途径的阴性对照。结果:1506例痴呆事件。RAO与全因痴呆无关(未匹配风险比(HR) 0.81, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.40-1.64;匹配HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.72-2.47;10个暴露事件)。血管性痴呆的估计仍然升高,但不精确(未匹配的风险比1.93,95% CI 1.02-3.66;匹配的风险比1.81,95% CI 0.66-4.94; 3个暴露事件)。白内障升高(HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.45-2.42),而BPPV (HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.90-1.79)和疝(HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.68-1.78)没有升高。结论:我们没有发现RAO与痴呆事件独立相关的证据,重复了欧洲在不同美国队列中的大量无效发现。该队列没有足够的力量来排除有临床意义的影响,特别是对于血管性痴呆。该数据集中的检测偏差明显是通路特异性的,但同一通路校准仅占残留血管性痴呆估计的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书