[Focus on the Brain Under Anesthesia: The Safe Brain Initiative's EEG Bootcamp].

IF 0.7
Max Ebensperger, Finn M Radtke, Stefan Schwerin, Gerhard Schneider, Stephan Kratzer, Matthias Kreuzer
{"title":"[Focus on the Brain Under Anesthesia: The Safe Brain Initiative's EEG Bootcamp].","authors":"Max Ebensperger, Finn M Radtke, Stefan Schwerin, Gerhard Schneider, Stephan Kratzer, Matthias Kreuzer","doi":"10.1055/a-2678-5500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In current anaesthetic practice, monitoring remains largely focused on cardiorespiratory parameters, while the brain, the primary target organ of anaesthesia, is insufficiently monitored. EEG-based neuromonitoring enables direct, continuous, and non-invasive evaluation of the cerebral effects of anaesthetics, yet its clinical application is often limited to numerical indices derived from proprietary algorithms. This simplification of a complex biosignal is prone to artifacts, delays, and systematic bias, particularly in elderly and frail patients.We argue that index-guided anaesthesia alone may fail to detect clinically relevant states such as burst suppression, even when values remain within recommended ranges. Age-related EEG changes, including reduced alpha activity and increased susceptibility to suppression, can result in falsely reassuring index values despite excessive anaesthetic depth. Importantly, both the occurrence and duration of burst suppression are associated with postoperative delirium and adverse cognitive outcomes.Visual interpretation of raw EEG and spectral patterns provides essential additional information, enabling individualized anaesthetic titration and avoiding overdosage. However, implementation is limited by insufficient training. Structured educational concepts, such as the Safe Brain Initiative EEG Bootcamp, are therefore critical to meaningfully integrate EEG-based monitoring into routine practice and advancing precision, patient-centred neuroprotective anaesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":520554,"journal":{"name":"Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS","volume":"61 7-08","pages":"434-444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2678-5500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: In current anaesthetic practice, monitoring remains largely focused on cardiorespiratory parameters, while the brain, the primary target organ of anaesthesia, is insufficiently monitored. EEG-based neuromonitoring enables direct, continuous, and non-invasive evaluation of the cerebral effects of anaesthetics, yet its clinical application is often limited to numerical indices derived from proprietary algorithms. This simplification of a complex biosignal is prone to artifacts, delays, and systematic bias, particularly in elderly and frail patients.We argue that index-guided anaesthesia alone may fail to detect clinically relevant states such as burst suppression, even when values remain within recommended ranges. Age-related EEG changes, including reduced alpha activity and increased susceptibility to suppression, can result in falsely reassuring index values despite excessive anaesthetic depth. Importantly, both the occurrence and duration of burst suppression are associated with postoperative delirium and adverse cognitive outcomes.Visual interpretation of raw EEG and spectral patterns provides essential additional information, enabling individualized anaesthetic titration and avoiding overdosage. However, implementation is limited by insufficient training. Structured educational concepts, such as the Safe Brain Initiative EEG Bootcamp, are therefore critical to meaningfully integrate EEG-based monitoring into routine practice and advancing precision, patient-centred neuroprotective anaesthesia.

[关注麻醉下的大脑:安全大脑倡议的脑电图训练营]。
摘要:在目前的麻醉实践中,监测仍然主要集中在心肺参数上,而对麻醉的主要靶器官大脑的监测不足。基于脑电图的神经监测能够直接、连续、无创地评估麻醉对大脑的影响,但其临床应用通常仅限于专有算法得出的数值指标。这种对复杂生物信号的简化容易产生伪影、延迟和系统性偏差,特别是在老年人和体弱患者中。我们认为,单独的指数引导麻醉可能无法检测到临床相关的状态,如爆发抑制,即使值保持在推荐范围内。尽管麻醉深度过深,但与年龄相关的脑电图变化,包括α活性降低和对抑制的易感性增加,可能导致错误的可靠指数值。重要的是,突发抑制的发生和持续时间与术后谵妄和不良认知结果有关。原始脑电图和频谱模式的视觉解释提供了必要的附加信息,使麻醉滴定个体化和避免过量。然而,由于培训不足,实施受到限制。因此,结构化的教育概念,如安全脑倡议脑电图训练营,对于有意义地将基于脑电图的监测整合到常规实践中,并提高精确度,以患者为中心的神经保护麻醉至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书