Provider Perspectives on Community Birth Transfers: Analysis of Personal Values and Attitudes Toward Community Birth Among Maternity Care Providers in Community and Hospital Settings.

IF 2.3
Samantha Shao, Krishna Unadkat, Yan Li, Laura Geldmaker, Courtney McEwen Cho, Julie Lamppa, Rebecca Smith, Alyssa Larish
{"title":"Provider Perspectives on Community Birth Transfers: Analysis of Personal Values and Attitudes Toward Community Birth Among Maternity Care Providers in Community and Hospital Settings.","authors":"Samantha Shao, Krishna Unadkat, Yan Li, Laura Geldmaker, Courtney McEwen Cho, Julie Lamppa, Rebecca Smith, Alyssa Larish","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.70167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Out-of-hospital community births account for 1.6% to 2% of births in the United States and are associated with fewer obstetric interventions but increased neonatal risk. Little is known about how maternity care providers' characteristics, values, and prior exposure to community birth influence attitudes toward community birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational cross-sectional survey using a 40 to 43 item Research Electronic Data Capture questionnaire distributed October 2 to 30, 2024. Eligible participants (\"providers\") included in-hospital physicians, midwives, community birth providers, and registered nurses. The survey assessed demographics, practice characteristics, provider values, prior community birth experience, and attitudes toward community birth. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize characteristics. Group comparisons between in-hospital and community birth providers were conducted using analysis of variance and χ<sup>2</sup> or Fisher exact tests. Associations between attitudes and provider values were evaluated using linear models with Bonferroni correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven providers completed the survey (51 in hospital, 16 community based). Most respondents were female (89.6%) and White (77.6%), with a median of 7 years in practice (IQR, 3-14.5). Attitudes significantly differed by role (P =  .007) and credentials (P =  .002). In-hospital providers reported safety concerns about community birth and perceived antenatal counseling to be inadequate. Perceived patient distrust during transfer was common among both in-hospital and community-based providers (69% and 81%, respectively). After adjustment for provider role and multiple comparisons, no significant differences in personal values were noted by attitude group; however, providers with positive attitudes toward community birth were more likely to believe that patients value compassion (β = 2.3, P =  .004).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Provider attitudes toward community birth appear to be shaped more by professional role and clinical experience than by differences in underlying value systems. High levels of perceived patient distrust during transfer highlight the need for interventions that strengthen compassion across maternity care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.70167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Out-of-hospital community births account for 1.6% to 2% of births in the United States and are associated with fewer obstetric interventions but increased neonatal risk. Little is known about how maternity care providers' characteristics, values, and prior exposure to community birth influence attitudes toward community birth.

Methods: We conducted an observational cross-sectional survey using a 40 to 43 item Research Electronic Data Capture questionnaire distributed October 2 to 30, 2024. Eligible participants ("providers") included in-hospital physicians, midwives, community birth providers, and registered nurses. The survey assessed demographics, practice characteristics, provider values, prior community birth experience, and attitudes toward community birth. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize characteristics. Group comparisons between in-hospital and community birth providers were conducted using analysis of variance and χ2 or Fisher exact tests. Associations between attitudes and provider values were evaluated using linear models with Bonferroni correction.

Results: Sixty-seven providers completed the survey (51 in hospital, 16 community based). Most respondents were female (89.6%) and White (77.6%), with a median of 7 years in practice (IQR, 3-14.5). Attitudes significantly differed by role (P =  .007) and credentials (P =  .002). In-hospital providers reported safety concerns about community birth and perceived antenatal counseling to be inadequate. Perceived patient distrust during transfer was common among both in-hospital and community-based providers (69% and 81%, respectively). After adjustment for provider role and multiple comparisons, no significant differences in personal values were noted by attitude group; however, providers with positive attitudes toward community birth were more likely to believe that patients value compassion (β = 2.3, P =  .004).

Discussion: Provider attitudes toward community birth appear to be shaped more by professional role and clinical experience than by differences in underlying value systems. High levels of perceived patient distrust during transfer highlight the need for interventions that strengthen compassion across maternity care settings.

社区分娩转移的提供者视角:社区和医院环境中产科护理提供者对社区分娩的个人价值观和态度分析
在美国,院外社区分娩占分娩的1.6%至2%,与产科干预较少有关,但新生儿风险增加。很少知道产妇保健提供者的特点,价值观,和以前暴露于社区分娩影响对社区分娩的态度。方法:采用一份40 ~ 43项的研究电子数据采集问卷,于2024年10月2日至30日进行观察性横断面调查。合格的参与者(“提供者”)包括住院医生、助产士、社区分娩提供者和注册护士。调查评估了人口统计、实践特征、提供者价值、以前的社区分娩经验和对社区分娩的态度。描述性统计用于总结特征。采用方差分析、χ2或Fisher精确检验对住院和社区助产士进行组间比较。使用Bonferroni校正的线性模型评估态度与提供者价值之间的关系。结果:67名提供者完成了调查(51名在医院,16名在社区)。大多数被调查者为女性(89.6%)和白人(77.6%),中位从业时间为7年(IQR, 3-14.5)。态度因角色(P = .007)和学历(P = .002)而显著不同。医院提供人员报告了对社区分娩的安全担忧,并认为产前咨询不足。在医院和社区服务提供者中,患者在转院过程中普遍感到不信任(分别为69%和81%)。在调整提供者角色和多重比较后,态度组的个人价值观没有显著差异;然而,对社区分娩持积极态度的提供者更有可能相信患者重视同情(β = 2.3, P = 0.004)。讨论:提供者对社区分娩的态度似乎更多地受到专业角色和临床经验的影响,而不是潜在价值体系的差异。在转移过程中,患者的高度不信任突出了需要采取干预措施,加强整个产科护理环境的同情心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书