Indications and Curability Criteria for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer in Elderly Patients: Current Standards and Future Perspectives

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Masau Sekiguchi, Ichiro Oda
{"title":"Indications and Curability Criteria for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer in Elderly Patients: Current Standards and Future Perspectives","authors":"Masau Sekiguchi,&nbsp;Ichiro Oda","doi":"10.1111/den.70257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Population aging has substantially altered the epidemiology and management of gastric cancer, particularly in East Asia, where a growing proportion of patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) are elderly. Current Japanese guidelines define indications and curability criteria for endoscopic resection (ER) irrespective of age. Consequently, gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy remains the standard treatment for EGC that exceeds established absolute and expanded ER indications or is classified as endoscopic curability (eCura) C-2 after ER. However, given the heterogeneity of metastatic risk and patient characteristics, uniform recommendation of gastrectomy may result in overtreatment in elderly patients. Nationwide registry data on patients undergoing gastrectomy have demonstrated that overall prognosis becomes increasingly limited and postoperative mortality rises with age, especially in men aged ≥ 75 years and women aged ≥ 80 years. These findings highlight the need to reconsider ER indications and post-resection management in elderly patients based on estimated lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk, operative mortality, and life expectancy. Recent studies suggest that expanding ER indications and redefining curability criteria in elderly patients using a higher acceptable LNM risk threshold, such as 10%, may represent a rational risk-adapted strategy. This concept is currently being evaluated in the multicenter phase III confirmatory trial conducted by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG1902). Importantly, long-term outcomes in elderly patients with EGC are influenced by non–gastric cancer deaths. Therefore, management strategies should integrate tumor-related risk with patient-related factors, including comorbidities, nutritional status, frailty, and competing mortality risks, to achieve individualized and clinically meaningful care in this expanding population.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":159,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"38 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.70257","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population aging has substantially altered the epidemiology and management of gastric cancer, particularly in East Asia, where a growing proportion of patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) are elderly. Current Japanese guidelines define indications and curability criteria for endoscopic resection (ER) irrespective of age. Consequently, gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy remains the standard treatment for EGC that exceeds established absolute and expanded ER indications or is classified as endoscopic curability (eCura) C-2 after ER. However, given the heterogeneity of metastatic risk and patient characteristics, uniform recommendation of gastrectomy may result in overtreatment in elderly patients. Nationwide registry data on patients undergoing gastrectomy have demonstrated that overall prognosis becomes increasingly limited and postoperative mortality rises with age, especially in men aged ≥ 75 years and women aged ≥ 80 years. These findings highlight the need to reconsider ER indications and post-resection management in elderly patients based on estimated lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk, operative mortality, and life expectancy. Recent studies suggest that expanding ER indications and redefining curability criteria in elderly patients using a higher acceptable LNM risk threshold, such as 10%, may represent a rational risk-adapted strategy. This concept is currently being evaluated in the multicenter phase III confirmatory trial conducted by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG1902). Importantly, long-term outcomes in elderly patients with EGC are influenced by non–gastric cancer deaths. Therefore, management strategies should integrate tumor-related risk with patient-related factors, including comorbidities, nutritional status, frailty, and competing mortality risks, to achieve individualized and clinically meaningful care in this expanding population.

老年早期胃癌内镜切除术的适应症和治愈率标准:当前标准和未来展望。
人口老龄化极大地改变了胃癌的流行病学和治疗,特别是在东亚,老年早期胃癌(EGC)患者的比例越来越大。目前的日本指南定义了内镜切除(ER)的适应症和治愈率标准,而不考虑年龄。因此,胃切除术加淋巴结切除术仍然是EGC的标准治疗方法,超过了既定的绝对和扩大的ER适应症,或被归类为内镜下可治愈(eCura) C-2。然而,考虑到转移风险和患者特征的异质性,统一推荐胃切除术可能导致老年患者过度治疗。全国胃切除术患者的登记数据表明,总体预后越来越有限,术后死亡率随着年龄的增长而上升,尤其是≥75岁的男性和≥80岁的女性。这些发现强调需要根据估计的淋巴结转移(LNM)风险、手术死亡率和预期寿命重新考虑老年患者的ER适应症和切除术后管理。最近的研究表明,扩大ER适应症和重新定义老年患者的治愈率标准,使用更高的可接受的LNM风险阈值,如10%,可能是一种合理的风险适应策略。目前,日本临床肿瘤小组(JCOG1902)正在开展多中心III期验证性试验,对这一概念进行评估。重要的是,老年胃癌患者的长期预后受到非胃癌死亡的影响。因此,管理策略应结合肿瘤相关风险和患者相关因素,包括合并症、营养状况、虚弱和相互竞争的死亡风险,以便在这一不断扩大的人群中实现个性化和有临床意义的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Endoscopy
Digestive Endoscopy 医学-外科
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
15.10%
发文量
291
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Digestive Endoscopy (DEN) is the official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy and the World Endoscopy Organization. Digestive Endoscopy serves as a medium for presenting original articles that offer significant contributions to knowledge in the broad field of endoscopy. The Journal also includes Reviews, Original Articles, How I Do It, Case Reports (only of exceptional interest and novelty are accepted), Letters, Techniques and Images, abstracts and news items that may be of interest to endoscopists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书