Development and internal validation of a titanium ion-integrated diagnostic classification model for peri-implantitis.

IF 1.3 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Amar Ashok Thakare, Vaishali Mashalkar, Kavita Gupta, Rahul Tiwari, Harisha Dewan, Syed Shujaulla, Manish Sharma
{"title":"Development and internal validation of a titanium ion-integrated diagnostic classification model for peri-implantitis.","authors":"Amar Ashok Thakare, Vaishali Mashalkar, Kavita Gupta, Rahul Tiwari, Harisha Dewan, Syed Shujaulla, Manish Sharma","doi":"10.1002/cap.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Titanium release from dental implants has been implicated in peri-implantitis; however, its integration into multivariable models for disease classification remains limited. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a titanium ion-integrated model for the classification of peri-implantitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional analysis with prospective recruitment included 120 participants (60 healthy implants and 60 peri-implantitis). Titanium ion concentrations in peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) and serum were quantified using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Candidate predictors comprised PICF and serum titanium levels, implant surface area, functional duration, occlusal load, and age. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive the Titanium Release Score. Model discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis, while calibration was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Internal validation was performed through bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher titanium concentrations in PICF (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-1.90) and serum (adjusted OR = 1.79; 95% CI: 1.25-2.56) were associated with peri-implantitis. The model demonstrated good discriminative performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.95). Internal validation showed an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.83. Calibration was acceptable (Hosmer-Lemeshow, p = 0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The titanium-integrated model demonstrated good discrimination between peri-implantitis and healthy implants within the constraints of a cross-sectional design. Titanium ion levels were associated with disease status alongside implant-related variables. These findings support the potential role of titanium measurements as adjunctive biomarkers for disease classification rather than predictors of future risk; however, external validation and longitudinal studies are required before clinical application.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>A titanium ion-integrated classification model was developed to estimate peri-implantitis risk using peri-implant crevicular fluid, serum titanium levels, and implant variables. The Titanium Release Score demonstrated good discrimination (area under the curve 0.87) and acceptable calibration with stable performance after bootstrap validation. Titanium ion burden showed an independent associative value for peri-implantitis, supporting its role as a biologically relevant risk indicator.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Peri-implantitis is a common complication of dental implants that leads to inflammation and progressive bone loss. Early detection of implants at risk remains a clinical challenge. This study developed a classification model that combines titanium ion levels measured in peri-implant crevicular fluid and blood with implant-related factors such as surface area, duration of function, and occlusal load. Titanium, although widely used in implants, may be released over time and contribute to inflammatory responses. The model demonstrated good accuracy in distinguishing healthy implants from those with peri-implantitis, suggesting that titanium levels may provide additional information beyond traditional clinical parameters. These findings highlight the potential role of titanium measurements in improving risk assessment. However, further validation in larger and more diverse populations is required before this approach can be applied in routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55950,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.70090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Titanium release from dental implants has been implicated in peri-implantitis; however, its integration into multivariable models for disease classification remains limited. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a titanium ion-integrated model for the classification of peri-implantitis.

Methods: This cross-sectional analysis with prospective recruitment included 120 participants (60 healthy implants and 60 peri-implantitis). Titanium ion concentrations in peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) and serum were quantified using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Candidate predictors comprised PICF and serum titanium levels, implant surface area, functional duration, occlusal load, and age. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive the Titanium Release Score. Model discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis, while calibration was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Internal validation was performed through bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations).

Results: Higher titanium concentrations in PICF (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-1.90) and serum (adjusted OR = 1.79; 95% CI: 1.25-2.56) were associated with peri-implantitis. The model demonstrated good discriminative performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.95). Internal validation showed an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.83. Calibration was acceptable (Hosmer-Lemeshow, p = 0.62).

Conclusion: The titanium-integrated model demonstrated good discrimination between peri-implantitis and healthy implants within the constraints of a cross-sectional design. Titanium ion levels were associated with disease status alongside implant-related variables. These findings support the potential role of titanium measurements as adjunctive biomarkers for disease classification rather than predictors of future risk; however, external validation and longitudinal studies are required before clinical application.

Key points: A titanium ion-integrated classification model was developed to estimate peri-implantitis risk using peri-implant crevicular fluid, serum titanium levels, and implant variables. The Titanium Release Score demonstrated good discrimination (area under the curve 0.87) and acceptable calibration with stable performance after bootstrap validation. Titanium ion burden showed an independent associative value for peri-implantitis, supporting its role as a biologically relevant risk indicator.

Plain language summary: Peri-implantitis is a common complication of dental implants that leads to inflammation and progressive bone loss. Early detection of implants at risk remains a clinical challenge. This study developed a classification model that combines titanium ion levels measured in peri-implant crevicular fluid and blood with implant-related factors such as surface area, duration of function, and occlusal load. Titanium, although widely used in implants, may be released over time and contribute to inflammatory responses. The model demonstrated good accuracy in distinguishing healthy implants from those with peri-implantitis, suggesting that titanium levels may provide additional information beyond traditional clinical parameters. These findings highlight the potential role of titanium measurements in improving risk assessment. However, further validation in larger and more diverse populations is required before this approach can be applied in routine clinical practice.

种植体周围炎钛离子集成诊断分类模型的建立与内部验证。
背景:钛从种植体中释放与种植体周围炎有关;然而,将其整合到疾病分类的多变量模型中仍然有限。本研究旨在开发并内部验证钛离子集成模型用于种植体周围炎的分类。方法:这项前瞻性招募的横断面分析包括120名参与者(60名健康种植体和60名种植体周围炎)。采用电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定种植体周围沟液(PICF)和血清中钛离子浓度。候选预测因子包括PICF和血清钛水平、种植体表面积、功能持续时间、咬合负荷和年龄。采用多变量logistic回归计算钛释放评分。模型判别采用接收者工作特征分析进行评估,而校准采用Hosmer-Lemeshow检验进行评估。内部验证通过自举重采样(1000次迭代)进行。结果:PICF(校正优势比[OR] = 1.52; 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.22-1.90)和血清(校正优势比[OR] = 1.79; 95% CI: 1.25-2.56)中较高的钛浓度与种植体周围炎相关。该模型具有良好的判别性能(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.95)。内部验证显示乐观校正的AUC为0.83。校正可接受(Hosmer-Lemeshow, p = 0.62)。结论:在截面设计的约束下,钛集成模型对种植体周围炎和健康种植体具有良好的区分能力。钛离子水平与疾病状态以及植入物相关变量相关。这些发现支持钛测量作为疾病分类的辅助生物标志物而不是预测未来风险的潜在作用;然而,在临床应用之前,需要外部验证和纵向研究。重点:建立钛离子综合分类模型,利用种植体周围沟液、血清钛水平和种植体变量来评估种植体周围炎的风险。钛释放评分具有良好的判别性(曲线下面积0.87),可接受的校准,自举验证后性能稳定。钛离子负荷对种植体周围炎具有独立的关联价值,支持其作为生物学相关风险指标的作用。摘要:种植体周围炎是牙种植体的常见并发症,可导致炎症和进行性骨质流失。早期发现有危险的植入物仍然是一个临床挑战。本研究建立了一种结合种植体周围沟液和血液中钛离子水平测量与种植体相关因素(如表面积、功能持续时间和咬合负荷)的分类模型。钛虽然广泛用于植入物,但随着时间的推移可能会释放并导致炎症反应。该模型在区分健康种植体和种植体周围炎方面表现出良好的准确性,表明钛水平可能提供传统临床参数之外的额外信息。这些发现强调了钛测量在改善风险评估方面的潜在作用。然而,在将该方法应用于常规临床实践之前,需要在更大、更多样化的人群中进行进一步的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Advances in Periodontics
Clinical Advances in Periodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书