Comprehensive social determinants of health and brain health in midlife.

IF 7.8 Q2 BUSINESS
Christina S Dintica, Julia Cheunkarndee, R Nick Bryan, Lenore J Launer, Kristine Yaffe
{"title":"Comprehensive social determinants of health and brain health in midlife.","authors":"Christina S Dintica, Julia Cheunkarndee, R Nick Bryan, Lenore J Launer, Kristine Yaffe","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDOH) are increasingly recognized as important drivers of cognitive outcomes. However, most existing evidence focuses on individual SDOH components and older populations.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a comprehensive SDOH index and examine its association with subsequent changes in cognitive function and structural brain measures in midlife.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study with repeated measures of cognition and brain imaging.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community-based cohort from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 3488 participants with SDOH data in early midlife (mean age 40.0 ± 3.6 years); 645 participants had repeated brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>A weighted aggregate SDOH index was constructed from 12 items across 5 domains: economic stability, community and social context, education, neighborhood and built environment, and health care access. Cognitive function was assessed using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Stroop Test, and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). Brain MRI outcomes included white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) and total gray matter (GM) volume. Mixed linear regression models examined associations between SDOH quartiles and longitudinal cognitive and MRI outcomes, adjusting for demographics, vascular risk factors, depression, and intracranial volume (for MRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, participants in the most disadvantaged SDOH quartile performed worse across all cognitive tests compared with the least disadvantaged quartile (p < 0.001). Over time, the most disadvantaged quartile showed steeper decline in DSST performance (adj. mean change: -0.72, 95% CI: -0.93 to -0.52 vs. -0.55, 95% CI: -0.76 to -0.34, p = 0.013), greater WMH accumulation (ratio: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.09 vs. 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.05, p = 0.007), and steeper decline in total GM volume (-2.02 cm³, 95% CI: -2.39 to -1.65 vs. -1.46 cm³, 95% CI: -1.71 to -1.20, p = 0.011) per 5-year interval compared to the least disadvantaged quartile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Greater social disadvantage in midlife is associated with worse baseline cognition and accelerated decline in cognitive function and brain integrity. These findings highlight the importance of SDOH as key determinants of brain health in midlife and suggest that strategies to mitigate social disadvantage may help preserve cognitive and brain health.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 9","pages":"100652"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13487268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social determinants of health (SDOH) are increasingly recognized as important drivers of cognitive outcomes. However, most existing evidence focuses on individual SDOH components and older populations.

Objectives: To develop a comprehensive SDOH index and examine its association with subsequent changes in cognitive function and structural brain measures in midlife.

Design: Prospective cohort study with repeated measures of cognition and brain imaging.

Setting: Community-based cohort from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.

Participants: A total of 3488 participants with SDOH data in early midlife (mean age 40.0 ± 3.6 years); 645 participants had repeated brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data.

Measurements: A weighted aggregate SDOH index was constructed from 12 items across 5 domains: economic stability, community and social context, education, neighborhood and built environment, and health care access. Cognitive function was assessed using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Stroop Test, and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). Brain MRI outcomes included white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) and total gray matter (GM) volume. Mixed linear regression models examined associations between SDOH quartiles and longitudinal cognitive and MRI outcomes, adjusting for demographics, vascular risk factors, depression, and intracranial volume (for MRI).

Results: At baseline, participants in the most disadvantaged SDOH quartile performed worse across all cognitive tests compared with the least disadvantaged quartile (p < 0.001). Over time, the most disadvantaged quartile showed steeper decline in DSST performance (adj. mean change: -0.72, 95% CI: -0.93 to -0.52 vs. -0.55, 95% CI: -0.76 to -0.34, p = 0.013), greater WMH accumulation (ratio: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.09 vs. 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.05, p = 0.007), and steeper decline in total GM volume (-2.02 cm³, 95% CI: -2.39 to -1.65 vs. -1.46 cm³, 95% CI: -1.71 to -1.20, p = 0.011) per 5-year interval compared to the least disadvantaged quartile.

Conclusions: Greater social disadvantage in midlife is associated with worse baseline cognition and accelerated decline in cognitive function and brain integrity. These findings highlight the importance of SDOH as key determinants of brain health in midlife and suggest that strategies to mitigate social disadvantage may help preserve cognitive and brain health.

中年健康和大脑健康的综合社会决定因素。
背景:健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)越来越被认为是认知结果的重要驱动因素。然而,大多数现有证据侧重于个体SDOH成分和老年人群。目的:建立一个全面的SDOH指数,并研究其与中年认知功能和脑结构测量的后续变化的关系。设计:前瞻性队列研究,重复测量认知和脑成像。背景:来自年轻人冠状动脉风险发展(CARDIA)研究的社区队列。参与者:共有3488名中年早期有SDOH数据的参与者(平均年龄40.0±3.6岁);645名参与者重复了脑磁共振成像(MRI)数据。测量方法:从经济稳定性、社区和社会背景、教育、邻里和建筑环境以及卫生保健可及性5个领域的12个项目构建加权综合SDOH指数。采用数字符号替代测试(DSST)、Stroop测试和Rey听觉语言学习测试(RAVLT)评估认知功能。脑MRI结果包括白质高强度(WMHs)和总灰质(GM)体积。混合线性回归模型检验了SDOH四分位数与纵向认知和MRI结果之间的关系,调整了人口统计学、血管危险因素、抑郁和颅内容积(MRI)。结果:在基线时,处境最不利的SDOH四分位数的参与者在所有认知测试中的表现都比处境最不利的四分位数的参与者差(p < 0.001)。随着时间的推移,最弱势的四分位数显示陡DSST性能下降(形容词意味着改变:-0.72,95%置信区间CI: -0.93 - -0.52和-0.55,95%置信区间CI: -0.76 - -0.34, p = 0.013),积累更大的负责人(比率:1.07,95%置信区间CI: 1.05 - 1.09和1.04,95%置信区间CI: 1.03 - 1.05, p = 0.007),通用汽车总量和陡峭的下降(³-2.02厘米,95%置信区间CI: -2.39 - -1.65和-1.46厘米³,95%置信区间CI: -1.71 - -1.20, p = 0.011)相比,每5年间隔至少弱势四分位数。结论:中年人的社会劣势越大,基线认知能力越差,认知功能和脑完整性下降越快。这些发现强调了SDOH作为中年大脑健康的关键决定因素的重要性,并表明减轻社会劣势的策略可能有助于保持认知和大脑健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书