From healthcare encounters to policy: Patient and stakeholder perspectives on how stigma undermines care for people with substance use disorders and multiple disadvantages.
{"title":"From healthcare encounters to policy: Patient and stakeholder perspectives on how stigma undermines care for people with substance use disorders and multiple disadvantages.","authors":"Nikolaos Mylonas, Stephen J Kaar","doi":"10.1177/13558196261475658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesStigma is a well-documented barrier to care for people with substance use disorders (SUDs), but little is known about how it affects individuals with SUDs who also experience multiple disadvantages such as homelessness, poverty and unmet health care needs. This article explores how stigma is experienced by service users, staff, and system-level stakeholders of outreach services tailored to this cohort, and how it shapes interactions with health care services, treatment engagement, and service implementation.MethodsNinety-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with service users, staff, and stakeholders of three outreach-based services for people with SUDs and multiple disadvantages in England. Data were analysed using the iterative categorisation technique. The analysis was guided by a framework informed by a sociological model of stigma and a typology of stigma and discrimination in mental health.ResultsFour themes were identified: (1) stigmatising language and discriminatory practices in primary and acute health care encounters; (2) self-stigma and its impact on help-seeking behaviour; (3) the influence of stigma on the commissioning and sustainability of services tailored to this cohort; and (4) the key role of specialist services, such as outreach services and acute hospital alcohol care teams, in reducing stigma.ConclusionsStigma operates across interpersonal and structural levels, undermining equitable care for people with SUDs and multiple disadvantages. Addressing these barriers requires stigma-informed training for acute and primary health care providers, as well as advocacy skills for specialist services.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196261475658"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196261475658","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectivesStigma is a well-documented barrier to care for people with substance use disorders (SUDs), but little is known about how it affects individuals with SUDs who also experience multiple disadvantages such as homelessness, poverty and unmet health care needs. This article explores how stigma is experienced by service users, staff, and system-level stakeholders of outreach services tailored to this cohort, and how it shapes interactions with health care services, treatment engagement, and service implementation.MethodsNinety-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with service users, staff, and stakeholders of three outreach-based services for people with SUDs and multiple disadvantages in England. Data were analysed using the iterative categorisation technique. The analysis was guided by a framework informed by a sociological model of stigma and a typology of stigma and discrimination in mental health.ResultsFour themes were identified: (1) stigmatising language and discriminatory practices in primary and acute health care encounters; (2) self-stigma and its impact on help-seeking behaviour; (3) the influence of stigma on the commissioning and sustainability of services tailored to this cohort; and (4) the key role of specialist services, such as outreach services and acute hospital alcohol care teams, in reducing stigma.ConclusionsStigma operates across interpersonal and structural levels, undermining equitable care for people with SUDs and multiple disadvantages. Addressing these barriers requires stigma-informed training for acute and primary health care providers, as well as advocacy skills for specialist services.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.