GlucoNeo Check in the community: feasibility of photoplethysmography-based non-invasive glucose screening.

IF 3.2 3区医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

International Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2026-07-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ijph.2026.1609599

Mahendro Prasetyo Kusumo, Slamet Riyadi, Karisma Trinanda Putra, Deasy Ardiany

{"title":"GlucoNeo Check in the community: feasibility of photoplethysmography-based non-invasive glucose screening.","authors":"Mahendro Prasetyo Kusumo, Slamet Riyadi, Karisma Trinanda Putra, Deasy Ardiany","doi":"10.3389/ijph.2026.1609599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to determine accuracy of GlucoNeo Check, PPG-Based Non-Invasive Glucose Screening Device in interpreting patients' blood glucose levels and to understand participants' perspectives on their experiences.Method: This study uses a mixed-methods with a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy design to obtain a comprehensive overview through Clarke Error Grid Analysis using 660 participants with 3300 data sets, while incorporating qualitative components to assess feasibility and acceptance, using interviews and FGDs from 31 respondents, and analyzed thematically to understand user experience perspectives when using the device.Results: GlucoNeo Check performance had a Mean Absolute Percentage Error of 3.6% ± 0.621 and classification accuracy of 89.2% ± 0.0515. Most data fell within Zone A, with a small amount in Zone B and no data in Zones C and D. Thematic analysis identified 4 themes: 1) device quality and practicality, 2) comfort of use, 3) facilitating technology, and 4) inclusive interface design.Conclusion: GlucoNeo Check is accurate, innovative, and well-received tool for supporting community-based diabetes prevention but requires further validation to be adopted as a standard clinical monitoring tool.","PeriodicalId":14322,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health","volume":"71 ","pages":"1609599"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13454832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2026.1609599","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to determine accuracy of GlucoNeo Check, PPG-Based Non-Invasive Glucose Screening Device in interpreting patients' blood glucose levels and to understand participants' perspectives on their experiences.

Method: This study uses a mixed-methods with a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy design to obtain a comprehensive overview through Clarke Error Grid Analysis using 660 participants with 3300 data sets, while incorporating qualitative components to assess feasibility and acceptance, using interviews and FGDs from 31 respondents, and analyzed thematically to understand user experience perspectives when using the device.

Results: GlucoNeo Check performance had a Mean Absolute Percentage Error of 3.6% ± 0.621 and classification accuracy of 89.2% ± 0.0515. Most data fell within Zone A, with a small amount in Zone B and no data in Zones C and D. Thematic analysis identified 4 themes: 1) device quality and practicality, 2) comfort of use, 3) facilitating technology, and 4) inclusive interface design.

Conclusion: GlucoNeo Check is accurate, innovative, and well-received tool for supporting community-based diabetes prevention but requires further validation to be adopted as a standard clinical monitoring tool.

查看原文本刊更多论文

社区GlucoNeo检查：基于光容积描记仪的无创血糖筛查的可行性。

目的：本研究旨在确定基于ppg的无创血糖筛查装置GlucoNeo Check在解释患者血糖水平方面的准确性，并了解参与者对其经历的看法。方法：本研究采用混合方法和横断面诊断准确性设计，通过克拉克误差网格分析，对660名参与者和3300个数据集进行全面概述，同时结合定性成分评估可行性和可接受性，使用31名受访者的访谈和fgd，并进行主题分析，以了解使用该设备时的用户体验观点。结果：GlucoNeo Check的平均绝对百分比误差为3.6%±0.621，分类准确率为89.2%±0.0515。大部分数据集中在A区，B区数据较少，C区和d区没有数据。专题分析确定了4个主题：1)设备质量和实用性，2)使用舒适性，3)便利技术，4)包容性界面设计。结论：GlucoNeo Check是一种准确、创新且广受欢迎的支持社区糖尿病预防的工具，但需要进一步验证才能作为标准的临床监测工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

2.20%

发文量

269

审稿时长

12 months

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Public Health publishes scientific articles relevant to global public health, from different countries and cultures, and assembles them into issues that raise awareness and understanding of public health problems and solutions. The Journal welcomes submissions of original research, critical and relevant reviews, methodological papers and manuscripts that emphasize theoretical content. IJPH sometimes publishes commentaries and opinions. Special issues highlight key areas of current research. The Editorial Board''s mission is to provide a thoughtful forum for contemporary issues and challenges in global public health research and practice.