The MILEPOST Framework for Integrating mHealth Into Community-Driven Interventions: Lessons Learned From a Human-Centered Design Approach in Rural Uganda.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Josephine Schwab, Jonas Wachinger, Maxencia Nabiryo, Juliette Cazier, Juliet Wanyana, Kizito Mayombwe, Ezekiel Okou, Dennis Oloka, John Bosco Ntambara, Richard Munana, Ivan Weswa, Isaac Sekitoleko, Andrew Basenero, Rebecca Ingenhoff, Caterina Favaretti, Vasanthi Subramonia Pillai, Till Bärnighausen, Nikkil Sudharsanan, Robert Kalyesubula, Christine Nalwadda, Shannon A McMahon
{"title":"The MILEPOST Framework for Integrating mHealth Into Community-Driven Interventions: Lessons Learned From a Human-Centered Design Approach in Rural Uganda.","authors":"Josephine Schwab, Jonas Wachinger, Maxencia Nabiryo, Juliette Cazier, Juliet Wanyana, Kizito Mayombwe, Ezekiel Okou, Dennis Oloka, John Bosco Ntambara, Richard Munana, Ivan Weswa, Isaac Sekitoleko, Andrew Basenero, Rebecca Ingenhoff, Caterina Favaretti, Vasanthi Subramonia Pillai, Till Bärnighausen, Nikkil Sudharsanan, Robert Kalyesubula, Christine Nalwadda, Shannon A McMahon","doi":"10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Participatory design approaches to develop global health interventions have gained traction in recent years. However, while broad frameworks for the application of design approaches exist, literature outlining concrete experiences of and guidance for navigating specific design challenges remains limited. This article proposes a design framework based on our own experiences when applying human-centered design principles to bolster sustainable hypertension medication financing in rural Uganda. In our case study, we embedded an mHealth platform within a community-led health intervention aiming to fund blood pressure medication through a shared financial pooling system. Over the course of this project and in close collaboration with intervention end-users, we developed a design framework that outlines challenges, decision-making processes, and design solutions. We iteratively refined the framework between November 2021 and April 2023 over two phases of extensive formative research and one phase of structured qualitative data collection, consisting of 55 in-depth interviews and 4 focus group discussions with clients with hypertension, health care providers, and key intervention stakeholders. The resulting MILEPOST framework consists of 7 domains to consider amid mHealth intervention co-development: medical (e.g., health challenge scope and management); interpersonal (e.g., communication, decision-making, and trust within and across communities); logistical (e.g., current processes and sustainable implementation pathways); ethical (e.g., research and implementation ethics); political (e.g., stakeholder buy-in and long-term support); scientific (e.g., rigorous and feasible approaches for data collection, management, and analysis); and technical (e.g., mHealth component development, refinement, and implementation). We define each domain, provide examples of design challenges and derived solutions as they emerged in our work, and outline starting points for operationalizing each domain in other contexts or studies. We discuss how MILEPOST can provide guidance to researchers and implementors by contributing specific and actionable insights for participatory health intervention design efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12692,"journal":{"name":"Global Health: Science and Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13455845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health: Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participatory design approaches to develop global health interventions have gained traction in recent years. However, while broad frameworks for the application of design approaches exist, literature outlining concrete experiences of and guidance for navigating specific design challenges remains limited. This article proposes a design framework based on our own experiences when applying human-centered design principles to bolster sustainable hypertension medication financing in rural Uganda. In our case study, we embedded an mHealth platform within a community-led health intervention aiming to fund blood pressure medication through a shared financial pooling system. Over the course of this project and in close collaboration with intervention end-users, we developed a design framework that outlines challenges, decision-making processes, and design solutions. We iteratively refined the framework between November 2021 and April 2023 over two phases of extensive formative research and one phase of structured qualitative data collection, consisting of 55 in-depth interviews and 4 focus group discussions with clients with hypertension, health care providers, and key intervention stakeholders. The resulting MILEPOST framework consists of 7 domains to consider amid mHealth intervention co-development: medical (e.g., health challenge scope and management); interpersonal (e.g., communication, decision-making, and trust within and across communities); logistical (e.g., current processes and sustainable implementation pathways); ethical (e.g., research and implementation ethics); political (e.g., stakeholder buy-in and long-term support); scientific (e.g., rigorous and feasible approaches for data collection, management, and analysis); and technical (e.g., mHealth component development, refinement, and implementation). We define each domain, provide examples of design challenges and derived solutions as they emerged in our work, and outline starting points for operationalizing each domain in other contexts or studies. We discuss how MILEPOST can provide guidance to researchers and implementors by contributing specific and actionable insights for participatory health intervention design efforts.

将移动医疗纳入社区驱动干预措施的里程碑框架:从乌干达农村以人为中心的设计方法中学到的经验教训。
近年来,制定全球卫生干预措施的参与式设计方法获得了广泛关注。然而,虽然存在设计方法应用的广泛框架,但概述具体经验和导航特定设计挑战的指导的文献仍然有限。本文根据我们在乌干达农村应用以人为本的设计原则支持可持续高血压药物融资的经验,提出了一个设计框架。在我们的案例研究中,我们在社区主导的健康干预中嵌入了一个移动健康平台,旨在通过共享的财务池系统为血压药物提供资金。在这个项目的过程中,通过与干预终端用户的密切合作,我们开发了一个设计框架,概述了挑战、决策过程和设计解决方案。在2021年11月至2023年4月期间,我们通过两个阶段的广泛形成性研究和一个阶段的结构化定性数据收集,迭代地完善了框架,包括55次深度访谈和4次与高血压患者、医疗保健提供者和关键干预利益相关者的焦点小组讨论。由此产生的MILEPOST框架包括在移动医疗干预共同开发中需要考虑的7个领域:医疗(例如,健康挑战范围和管理);人际关系(如沟通、决策以及社区内部和社区之间的信任);后勤(例如,当前流程和可持续实施途径);伦理(如研究和实施伦理);政治(例如,利益相关者的参与和长期支持);科学的(例如,严谨可行的数据收集、管理和分析方法);和技术(例如,移动医疗组件的开发、改进和实施)。我们定义了每个领域,提供了在我们的工作中出现的设计挑战和衍生解决方案的示例,并概述了在其他环境或研究中操作每个领域的起点。我们讨论了MILEPOST如何通过为参与式卫生干预设计工作提供具体和可操作的见解,为研究人员和实施者提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health: Science and Practice
Global Health: Science and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
178
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health: Science and Practice (GHSP) is a no-fee, open-access, peer-reviewed, online journal aimed to improve health practice, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Our goal is to reach those who design, implement, manage, evaluate, and otherwise support health programs. We are especially interested in advancing knowledge on practical program implementation issues, with information on what programs entail and how they are implemented. GHSP is currently indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, POPLINE, EBSCO, SCOPUS,. the Web of Science Emerging Sources Citation Index, and the USAID Development Experience Clearinghouse (DEC). TOPICS: Issued four times a year, GHSP will include articles on all global health topics, covering diverse programming models and a wide range of cross-cutting issues that impact and support health systems. Examples include but are not limited to: Health: Addiction and harm reduction, Child Health, Communicable and Emerging Diseases, Disaster Preparedness and Response, Environmental Health, Family Planning/Reproductive Health, HIV/AIDS, Malaria, Maternal Health, Neglected Tropical Diseases, Non-Communicable Diseases/Injuries, Nutrition, Tuberculosis, Water and Sanitation. Cross-Cutting Issues: Epidemiology, Gender, Health Communication/Healthy Behavior, Health Policy and Advocacy, Health Systems, Human Resources/Training, Knowledge Management, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Management and Governance, mHealth/eHealth/digital health, Monitoring and Evaluation, Scale Up, Youth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书