Skin Impacts and Tradeoffs of GLP-1 Therapy: Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes of Inflammatory Skin Disease in the Era of "Ozempic Face".

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Saroja Rao, Isabella Midura, Kathyana P Santiago Mangual, Leon I Igel, Katherine H Saunders, Jocelyn Carter, Jenny E Murase, Arianne Shadi Kourosh
{"title":"Skin Impacts and Tradeoffs of GLP-1 Therapy: Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes of Inflammatory Skin Disease in the Era of \"Ozempic Face\".","authors":"Saroja Rao, Isabella Midura, Kathyana P Santiago Mangual, Leon I Igel, Katherine H Saunders, Jocelyn Carter, Jenny E Murase, Arianne Shadi Kourosh","doi":"10.1007/s13555-026-01882-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the surge in use of glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) for weight management, \"Ozempic Face,\" one of the dermatologic effects describing facial hollowing, sinking cheeks, and skin laxity, has drawn public attention. While substantial media discourse has surrounded certain dermatologic effects, patient-reported data is needed to more accurately characterize them. This study identifies patient-reported changes in skin, hair, and nails associated with weight management treatment with GLP-1RAs, including the frequency of dermatologic effects relative to weight loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study was conducted through an IRB-approved, voluntary, anonymous survey developed via collaboration between obesity medicine physicians and dermatologists. The survey was then distributed to patients of a virtual cardio-kidney-metabolic treatment program. Responses (n = 1226) were sorted by the percent body weight lost and categorized by medication regimen (glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists; GLP-1RA, nonGLP-1RA, or combination therapy). Patients reported dermatologic and overall physical changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dermatologic effects were reported more frequently with greater weight loss. Of respondents reporting greater than 20% body weight loss, (n = 325) 233 (72%; 95% CI 67-76) reported skin sagging, (n = 325) 170 (52%; 95% CI 47-58) reported hair loss, (n = 325) 163 (50%; 95% CI 45-55) reported decreased facial volume, and (n = 325) 107 (33%; 95% CI 28-38) reported reduced strength. Of respondents reporting 10-20% weight loss, (n = 395) 172 (44%; 95% CI 39-49) reported skin sagging, (n = 395) 119 (30%; 95% CI 26-35) reported hair loss, (n = 395) 147 (37%; 95% CI 33-42) reported decreased facial volume, and (n = 395) 76 (19%; 95% CI 16-23%) reported reduced strength. In comparison, of respondents reporting less than 10% weight loss, only (n = 380) 57 (15%; 95% CI 12-19) reported skin sagging, (n = 380) 65 (17%; 95% CI 13-21) reported hair loss, (n = 380) 48 (13%; 95% CI 10-16) reported decreased facial volume, and (n = 380) 35 (9%; 95% CI 7-13) reported reduced strength. The frequency of adverse patient-reported outcomes increased significantly with increasing percentage of body weight loss. Cochran-Armitage trend testing identified significant positive trends across the < 10%, 10-20%, and > 20% body weight loss categories for skin sagging (Z = 15.22), hair loss (Z = 9.91), decreased facial volume (Z = 10.70), and reduced strength (Z = 7.85), with P values of < 0.001. Among survey respondents on at least one GLP-1RA medication therapy, improvement was reported in certain preexisting inflammatory and hormonally driven skin conditions, including hidradenitis suppurativa (n = 15), 13 (87%; 95% CI 60-98); acanthosis nigricans (n = 12), 9 (75%; 95% CI 43-93); psoriasis (n = 47), 22 (47%; 95% CI 32-62); acne (n = 41), 17 (41%; 95% CI 27-57); eczema (n = 64), 17 (27%; 95% CI 17-39); hirsutism (n = 14), 4 (29%; 95% CI 10-56); seborrheic dermatitis (n = 16), 4 (25%; 95% CI 8-52); and skin tags (n = 57), 14 (25%; 95% CI 15-37).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This large analysis of patient-reported outcomes suggests that greater weight loss, which often occurred with GLP-1RA treatment regimens versus other weight management therapies, was associated with higher reports of negative aesthetic impacts, most notably skin laxity, facial volume loss, and hair shedding, although with improvement in preexisting inflammatory and hormonally driven dermatological conditions. This calls for further studies to determine the potential mechanisms and incidence behind patient-reported outcomes associated with significant weight loss on GLP-1RA medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11186,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-026-01882-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: With the surge in use of glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) for weight management, "Ozempic Face," one of the dermatologic effects describing facial hollowing, sinking cheeks, and skin laxity, has drawn public attention. While substantial media discourse has surrounded certain dermatologic effects, patient-reported data is needed to more accurately characterize them. This study identifies patient-reported changes in skin, hair, and nails associated with weight management treatment with GLP-1RAs, including the frequency of dermatologic effects relative to weight loss.

Methods: Our study was conducted through an IRB-approved, voluntary, anonymous survey developed via collaboration between obesity medicine physicians and dermatologists. The survey was then distributed to patients of a virtual cardio-kidney-metabolic treatment program. Responses (n = 1226) were sorted by the percent body weight lost and categorized by medication regimen (glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists; GLP-1RA, nonGLP-1RA, or combination therapy). Patients reported dermatologic and overall physical changes.

Results: Dermatologic effects were reported more frequently with greater weight loss. Of respondents reporting greater than 20% body weight loss, (n = 325) 233 (72%; 95% CI 67-76) reported skin sagging, (n = 325) 170 (52%; 95% CI 47-58) reported hair loss, (n = 325) 163 (50%; 95% CI 45-55) reported decreased facial volume, and (n = 325) 107 (33%; 95% CI 28-38) reported reduced strength. Of respondents reporting 10-20% weight loss, (n = 395) 172 (44%; 95% CI 39-49) reported skin sagging, (n = 395) 119 (30%; 95% CI 26-35) reported hair loss, (n = 395) 147 (37%; 95% CI 33-42) reported decreased facial volume, and (n = 395) 76 (19%; 95% CI 16-23%) reported reduced strength. In comparison, of respondents reporting less than 10% weight loss, only (n = 380) 57 (15%; 95% CI 12-19) reported skin sagging, (n = 380) 65 (17%; 95% CI 13-21) reported hair loss, (n = 380) 48 (13%; 95% CI 10-16) reported decreased facial volume, and (n = 380) 35 (9%; 95% CI 7-13) reported reduced strength. The frequency of adverse patient-reported outcomes increased significantly with increasing percentage of body weight loss. Cochran-Armitage trend testing identified significant positive trends across the < 10%, 10-20%, and > 20% body weight loss categories for skin sagging (Z = 15.22), hair loss (Z = 9.91), decreased facial volume (Z = 10.70), and reduced strength (Z = 7.85), with P values of < 0.001. Among survey respondents on at least one GLP-1RA medication therapy, improvement was reported in certain preexisting inflammatory and hormonally driven skin conditions, including hidradenitis suppurativa (n = 15), 13 (87%; 95% CI 60-98); acanthosis nigricans (n = 12), 9 (75%; 95% CI 43-93); psoriasis (n = 47), 22 (47%; 95% CI 32-62); acne (n = 41), 17 (41%; 95% CI 27-57); eczema (n = 64), 17 (27%; 95% CI 17-39); hirsutism (n = 14), 4 (29%; 95% CI 10-56); seborrheic dermatitis (n = 16), 4 (25%; 95% CI 8-52); and skin tags (n = 57), 14 (25%; 95% CI 15-37).

Conclusions: This large analysis of patient-reported outcomes suggests that greater weight loss, which often occurred with GLP-1RA treatment regimens versus other weight management therapies, was associated with higher reports of negative aesthetic impacts, most notably skin laxity, facial volume loss, and hair shedding, although with improvement in preexisting inflammatory and hormonally driven dermatological conditions. This calls for further studies to determine the potential mechanisms and incidence behind patient-reported outcomes associated with significant weight loss on GLP-1RA medications.

GLP-1治疗对皮肤的影响和权衡:改善了“臭氧面孔”时代炎症性皮肤病患者报告的结果
随着胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)用于体重管理的激增,“Ozempic Face”,一种描述面部凹陷、脸颊下沉和皮肤松弛的皮肤病效应,引起了公众的注意。虽然大量的媒体讨论围绕着某些皮肤病的影响,但需要患者报告的数据来更准确地描述它们。本研究确定了患者报告的与GLP-1RAs体重管理治疗相关的皮肤、头发和指甲的变化,包括相对于体重减轻的皮肤病影响的频率。方法:我们的研究是通过irb批准的、自愿的、匿名的调查进行的,该调查是由肥胖医学医生和皮肤科医生合作开展的。然后将调查结果分发给虚拟心肾代谢治疗项目的患者。应答(n = 1226)按体重减轻百分比进行分类,并按药物方案(胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂;GLP-1RA,非onglp - 1ra或联合治疗)进行分类。患者报告皮肤和整体身体变化。结果:随着体重减轻,皮肤效应的报道频率更高。在体重减轻超过20%的受访者中,(n = 325) 233人(72%;95% CI 67-76)报告皮肤松弛,(n = 325) 170人(52%;95% CI 47-58)报告脱发,(n = 325) 163人(50%;95% CI 45-55)报告面部体积减小,(n = 325) 107人(33%;95% CI 28-38)报告力量下降。在报告体重减轻10-20%的受访者中,(n = 395) 172人(44%;95% CI 39-49)报告皮肤松弛,(n = 395) 119人(30%;95% CI 26-35)报告脱发,(n = 395) 147人(37%;95% CI 33-42)报告面部体积减小,(n = 395) 76人(19%;95% CI 16-23%)报告力量下降。相比之下,在体重减轻不到10%的受访者中,只有(n = 380) 57人(15%;95% CI 12-19)报告皮肤松弛,(n = 380) 65人(17%;95% CI 13-21)报告脱发,(n = 380) 48人(13%;95% CI 10-16)报告面部体积减小,(n = 380) 35人(9%;95% CI 7-13)报告力量下降。不良患者报告结果的频率随着体重减轻百分比的增加而显著增加。Cochran-Armitage趋势检验发现,在体重减轻20%的类别中,皮肤松弛(Z = 15.22)、脱发(Z = 9.91)、面部体积减小(Z = 10.70)和力量减弱(Z = 7.85)均有显著的正趋势,P值为:这项对患者报告结果的大型分析表明,与其他体重管理疗法相比,GLP-1RA治疗方案经常出现更大的体重减轻,与更高的负面美学影响报告相关,最明显的是皮肤松弛,面部体积减少和脱发,尽管先前存在的炎症和激素驱动的皮肤病得到改善。这需要进一步的研究来确定与GLP-1RA药物显著减肥相关的患者报告结果的潜在机制和发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatology and Therapy
Dermatology and Therapy Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Dermatology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance). The journal is dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of dermatological therapies. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health and epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to all clinical aspects of dermatology, such as skin pharmacology; skin development and aging; prevention, diagnosis, and management of skin disorders and melanomas; research into dermal structures and pathology; and all areas of aesthetic dermatology, including skin maintenance, dermatological surgery, and lasers. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/case series, trial protocols, and short communications. Dermatology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an International and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. The journal appeals to a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书