The Point of no Return

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Australian dental journal Pub Date : 2026-08-25 Epub Date: 2026-08-11 DOI:10.1111/adj.70059
Ivan Darby
{"title":"The Point of no Return","authors":"Ivan Darby","doi":"10.1111/adj.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) through a thorough review of the evidence of various treatment modalities published the steps of periodontal treatment including end points (Sanz M, Herrera D, Kebschull M, et al.; On behalf of the EFP Workshop Participants and Methodological Consultants. Treatment of stage I–III periodontitis—The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline. <i>J Clin Periodontol</i>. 2020;47:4–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13290). Interestingly, prior to this there were really no suggestions about what the ‘ideal’ outcome for periodontal therapy should be. Essentially all pockets should be 4 mm and below. This also fits in the current classification's workshop on stable, remission and unstable outcomes (Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, et al. Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. <i>J Periodontol</i>. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S74–S84. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0719). However, evidence would suggest that it is very difficult to meet these goals. So why these end points be met (Aimetti M, Romano F, Costanzo L, De Caroli M, Di Venanzio A, Mariani GM, Baima G. Outcomes of Active Periodontal Therapy in a Specialist University Setting Following EFP S3 Treatment Guideline in Stage III-IV Periodontitis Patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2026 Apr;53(4):562–571. doi:10.1111/jcpe.70087. Epub 2026 Jan 19. PMID: 41554667.). This led to the thought that maybe there is a point of no return beyond which we will not or cannot achieve an ideal outcome in periodontics and by extension across all of dentistry. If we go beyond this point, is it a disaster?</p><p>A point of no return in periodontics is obviously the change from gingivitis to periodontitis with bone loss. Once we have bone loss it that it? No. We know that periodontal therapy works very well in mild-to-moderate disease, but less in severe disease. Teeth can be kept for many years even with residual increased probing depths and a large amount of bone loss (Hirschfeld L, Wasserman B. A long-term survey of tooth loss in 600 treated periodontal patients. J Periodontol. 1978 May;49(5):225–37. doi:10.1902/jop.1978.49.5.225. PMID: 277674.). However, regarding meeting EFP standards I would argue that once a mesial or distal furcation is exposed then non-surgical treatment will be unable to reduce probing to under 4 or 5 mm due the niche provided for colonisation and inability to debride well. This is a point of no return. So, should we extract these when we know we will not get probing depths to a level that would suggest stability? Furcation exposure does not mean automatic and sudden tooth loss. There are many factors involved and these teeth can be maintained for many years (Hirschfeld &amp; Wasserman 1978).</p><p>There are other areas of dentistry that have points of return such as the development of caries into cavitation, caries into the pulp and cracks in teeth to suggest a few.</p><p>The management of caries has changed greatly over the last few decades. There are more effective preventive measures and less surgical removal caries (Warreth A. Dental Caries and Its Management. Int J Dent. 2023 Jan 3;2023:9365845. doi:10.1155/2023/9365845. PMID: 36636170; PMCID: PMC9831703.). Carious lesions are not an automatic ‘no going back’ surgical intervention (Warreth 2023). Remineralisation of caries can be achieved through products like tooth mousse (Arifa MK, Ephraim R, Rajamani T. Recent Advances in Dental Hard Tissue Remineralization: A Review of Literature. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Mar-Apr;12(2):139–144. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10,005-1603. PMID: 31571787; PMCID: PMC6749882.) and resin infiltration can work well (Miranda, S.B.; Lins, R.B.E.; Silveira, J.A.M.d.; Leal, C.d.F.C.; Souza, C.M.C.d.; Moura, H.S.; Guimarães, L.G.; Prosini, P.; Montes, M.A.J.R. Efficacy of Resin Infiltrants in Non-Cavitated Occlusal Carious Lesions: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031310). There is a concept of infected and affected dentine, whereby the infected dentine only is removed and the affected dentine preventing a point-of-no-return pulpal exposure (https://decisionsindentistry.com/article/clinical-treatment-of-deep-caries/).</p><p>Obviously, a point of no return for the pulp is exposure through caries, iatrogenic perforation, fractures/cracks, trauma or root resorption. As above, caries management has evolved to reduce the incidence of pulpal exposure. Carious pulp exposure does not automatically mean pulpal removal and ‘traditional’ root canal treatment. Vital pulp therapy, where appropriate, can be very effective (Duncan HF. Present status and future directions-Vital pulp treatment and pulp preservation strategies. Int Endod J. 2022 May;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):497–511. doi:10.1111/iej.13688. Epub 2022 Feb 3. PMID: 35080024; PMCID: PMC9306596.). Even if a ‘full’ root canal procedure is required, it is not the end (Burns LE, Kim J, Wu Y, Alzwaideh R, McGowan R, Sigurdsson A. Outcomes of primary root canal therapy: An updated systematic review of longitudinal clinical studies published between 2003 and 2020. Int Endod J. 2022 Jul;55(7):714–731. doi:10.1111/iej.13736. Epub 2022 May 4. PMID: 35334111; PMCID: PMC9322405.). Regarding cracks, another point of return, depending on the extent, can be managed without extraction. For example, this could be cuspal protection or a root canal filling and cuspal protection, which work very well (RKaur S, Puzhankara L, Shenoy N, Kini KS, Singhal DK. Saving the split: An umbrella review on therapeutic approaches for cracked tooth syndrome. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2026 Jan;29(1):11–19. doi:10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_796_25. Epub 2026 Jan 10. PMID: 41660023; PMCID: PMC12880780.).</p><p>So, I think what I am trying to say that even though there is ‘no going back’, modern dentistry is very good at managing points of no return with great success. There are many points of no return that are not a ‘death knell’ as they were many years ago. Modern techniques, such as resin infiltration, and preventive methods work really well at stopping the teeth from tipping over the edge. I would be interested to see whether you agree or whether I have got it wrong.</p><p>Please remember I have practised as a periodontist for the last 25 years and may be out of date with all other aspects of dentistry, but I as far as I know the content of this editorial is as factually correct as I can make it. I have picked what I think are appropriate references to support my argument.</p><p><b>Ivan Darby:</b> conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":8593,"journal":{"name":"Australian dental journal","volume":"71 3","pages":"219-220"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.70059","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) through a thorough review of the evidence of various treatment modalities published the steps of periodontal treatment including end points (Sanz M, Herrera D, Kebschull M, et al.; On behalf of the EFP Workshop Participants and Methodological Consultants. Treatment of stage I–III periodontitis—The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47:4–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13290). Interestingly, prior to this there were really no suggestions about what the ‘ideal’ outcome for periodontal therapy should be. Essentially all pockets should be 4 mm and below. This also fits in the current classification's workshop on stable, remission and unstable outcomes (Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, et al. Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S74–S84. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0719). However, evidence would suggest that it is very difficult to meet these goals. So why these end points be met (Aimetti M, Romano F, Costanzo L, De Caroli M, Di Venanzio A, Mariani GM, Baima G. Outcomes of Active Periodontal Therapy in a Specialist University Setting Following EFP S3 Treatment Guideline in Stage III-IV Periodontitis Patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2026 Apr;53(4):562–571. doi:10.1111/jcpe.70087. Epub 2026 Jan 19. PMID: 41554667.). This led to the thought that maybe there is a point of no return beyond which we will not or cannot achieve an ideal outcome in periodontics and by extension across all of dentistry. If we go beyond this point, is it a disaster?

A point of no return in periodontics is obviously the change from gingivitis to periodontitis with bone loss. Once we have bone loss it that it? No. We know that periodontal therapy works very well in mild-to-moderate disease, but less in severe disease. Teeth can be kept for many years even with residual increased probing depths and a large amount of bone loss (Hirschfeld L, Wasserman B. A long-term survey of tooth loss in 600 treated periodontal patients. J Periodontol. 1978 May;49(5):225–37. doi:10.1902/jop.1978.49.5.225. PMID: 277674.). However, regarding meeting EFP standards I would argue that once a mesial or distal furcation is exposed then non-surgical treatment will be unable to reduce probing to under 4 or 5 mm due the niche provided for colonisation and inability to debride well. This is a point of no return. So, should we extract these when we know we will not get probing depths to a level that would suggest stability? Furcation exposure does not mean automatic and sudden tooth loss. There are many factors involved and these teeth can be maintained for many years (Hirschfeld & Wasserman 1978).

There are other areas of dentistry that have points of return such as the development of caries into cavitation, caries into the pulp and cracks in teeth to suggest a few.

The management of caries has changed greatly over the last few decades. There are more effective preventive measures and less surgical removal caries (Warreth A. Dental Caries and Its Management. Int J Dent. 2023 Jan 3;2023:9365845. doi:10.1155/2023/9365845. PMID: 36636170; PMCID: PMC9831703.). Carious lesions are not an automatic ‘no going back’ surgical intervention (Warreth 2023). Remineralisation of caries can be achieved through products like tooth mousse (Arifa MK, Ephraim R, Rajamani T. Recent Advances in Dental Hard Tissue Remineralization: A Review of Literature. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Mar-Apr;12(2):139–144. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10,005-1603. PMID: 31571787; PMCID: PMC6749882.) and resin infiltration can work well (Miranda, S.B.; Lins, R.B.E.; Silveira, J.A.M.d.; Leal, C.d.F.C.; Souza, C.M.C.d.; Moura, H.S.; Guimarães, L.G.; Prosini, P.; Montes, M.A.J.R. Efficacy of Resin Infiltrants in Non-Cavitated Occlusal Carious Lesions: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031310). There is a concept of infected and affected dentine, whereby the infected dentine only is removed and the affected dentine preventing a point-of-no-return pulpal exposure (https://decisionsindentistry.com/article/clinical-treatment-of-deep-caries/).

Obviously, a point of no return for the pulp is exposure through caries, iatrogenic perforation, fractures/cracks, trauma or root resorption. As above, caries management has evolved to reduce the incidence of pulpal exposure. Carious pulp exposure does not automatically mean pulpal removal and ‘traditional’ root canal treatment. Vital pulp therapy, where appropriate, can be very effective (Duncan HF. Present status and future directions-Vital pulp treatment and pulp preservation strategies. Int Endod J. 2022 May;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):497–511. doi:10.1111/iej.13688. Epub 2022 Feb 3. PMID: 35080024; PMCID: PMC9306596.). Even if a ‘full’ root canal procedure is required, it is not the end (Burns LE, Kim J, Wu Y, Alzwaideh R, McGowan R, Sigurdsson A. Outcomes of primary root canal therapy: An updated systematic review of longitudinal clinical studies published between 2003 and 2020. Int Endod J. 2022 Jul;55(7):714–731. doi:10.1111/iej.13736. Epub 2022 May 4. PMID: 35334111; PMCID: PMC9322405.). Regarding cracks, another point of return, depending on the extent, can be managed without extraction. For example, this could be cuspal protection or a root canal filling and cuspal protection, which work very well (RKaur S, Puzhankara L, Shenoy N, Kini KS, Singhal DK. Saving the split: An umbrella review on therapeutic approaches for cracked tooth syndrome. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2026 Jan;29(1):11–19. doi:10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_796_25. Epub 2026 Jan 10. PMID: 41660023; PMCID: PMC12880780.).

So, I think what I am trying to say that even though there is ‘no going back’, modern dentistry is very good at managing points of no return with great success. There are many points of no return that are not a ‘death knell’ as they were many years ago. Modern techniques, such as resin infiltration, and preventive methods work really well at stopping the teeth from tipping over the edge. I would be interested to see whether you agree or whether I have got it wrong.

Please remember I have practised as a periodontist for the last 25 years and may be out of date with all other aspects of dentistry, but I as far as I know the content of this editorial is as factually correct as I can make it. I have picked what I think are appropriate references to support my argument.

Ivan Darby: conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

不归路。
欧洲牙周病联合会(EFP)通过对各种治疗方式的证据进行全面审查,发表了包括终点在内的牙周治疗步骤(Sanz M, Herrera D, Kebschull M等人);代表EFP研讨会参与者和方法顾问。I-III期牙周炎的治疗- EFP S3级临床实践指南。临床牙周病杂志,2020;47(4):1 - 6。https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13290)。有趣的是,在此之前,并没有关于牙周治疗的“理想”结果的建议。基本上所有的口袋应该是4毫米以下。这也符合目前关于稳定、缓解和不稳定结果的分类研讨会(Chapple ILC, Mealey BL等)。完整和缩小的牙周组织上的牙周健康和牙龈疾病和状况:2017年牙周和种植体周围疾病和状况分类世界研讨会第一工作组的共识报告牙周病杂志。2018;89(增刊):S74-S84。https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.17 - 0719)。然而,有证据表明,实现这些目标是非常困难的。那么为什么会达到这些终点呢(Aimetti M, Romano F, Costanzo L, De Caroli M, Di Venanzio A, Mariani GM, Baima G.在专科大学环境下采用EFP S3治疗指南对III-IV期牙周炎患者进行主动牙周治疗的结果。临床牙周病杂志,2011;33(4):562-571。doi: 10.1111 / jcpe.70087。Epub 2026 1月19日PMID: 41554667)。这导致了这样一种想法,也许有一个不归路,超过了这个点,我们就不会或无法在牙周病和所有牙科领域取得理想的结果。如果我们超越了这一点,会是一场灾难吗?牙周病的一个不归路是明显地从牙龈炎转变为牙周炎伴骨质流失。一旦我们骨质流失了呢?否。我们知道牙周治疗在轻度到中度疾病中效果很好,但在严重疾病中效果较差。即使残留的探牙深度增加和大量的骨质流失,牙齿也可以保留多年(Hirschfeld L, Wasserman B.一项对600名接受治疗的牙周患者牙齿流失的长期调查)。牙周病杂志。1978;49(5):225-37。doi: 10.1902 / jop.1978.49.5.225。PMID: 277674)。然而,关于满足EFP标准,我认为,一旦暴露了近端或远端分叉,那么非手术治疗将无法将探查减少到4或5毫米以下,因为为定植提供了生态位,并且无法很好地清除。这是一个没有退路的时刻。那么,当我们知道探测深度无法达到稳定的水平时,我们是否应该提取这些数据呢?分叉暴露并不意味着自动和突然的牙齿脱落。有许多因素涉及到,这些牙齿可以保持多年(Hirschfeld & Wasserman 1978)。牙科的其他领域也有恢复点,比如蛀牙发展成空腔,蛀牙进入牙髓和牙齿裂缝。在过去的几十年里,龋齿的管理发生了很大的变化。有更有效的预防措施和更少的手术切除龋齿(warth A.龋齿及其管理)。[J] .国际医学杂志。2009年1月3日;2013:9365845。doi: 10.1155 / 2023/9365845。PMID: 36636170;PMCID: PMC9831703)。龋齿病变并不是一种自动的“无法回头”的手术干预(Warreth 2023)。龋齿的再矿化可以通过诸如牙摩丝之类的产品来实现(Arifa MK, Ephraim R, Rajamani T.)。中华临床儿科杂志,2019;12(2):139-144。doi: 10.5005 / jp -期刊10005 - 1603。PMID: 31571787;PMCID: PMC6749882.)和树脂浸润可以很好地起作用(Miranda, S.B.; Lins, R.B.E.; Silveira, J.A.M.d; Leal, C.d.F.C; Souza, C.M.C.d; Moura, H.S.; guimar<e:1>, L.G.; Prosini, P.; Montes, m.a.j.r。j .中国。医学,2026,15,1310。https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031310)。有一个受感染和受影响的牙本质的概念,即只切除受感染的牙本质,而受影响的牙本质则防止牙髓无法返回的暴露点(https://decisionsindentistry.com/article/clinical-treatment-of-deep-caries/).Obviously,牙髓无法返回的暴露点是通过龋齿、医源性穿孔、骨折/裂缝、创伤或牙根吸收而暴露。如上所述,龋齿的管理已经发展到减少牙髓暴露的发生率。龋齿牙髓暴露并不意味着摘除牙髓和“传统”的根管治疗。在适当的情况下,生命髓治疗是非常有效的(邓肯HF。动态牙髓治疗及牙髓保存策略的研究现状及未来发展方向。2022年5月;55增刊3(增刊3):497-511。doi: 10.1111 / iej.13688。2022年2月3日。PMID: 35080024;PMCID: PMC9306596)。 即使需要进行“完整”的根管治疗,这也不是结束(Burns LE, Kim J, Wu Y, Alzwaideh R, McGowan R, Sigurdsson a .初级根管治疗的结果:2003年至2020年发表的纵向临床研究的最新系统综述)。[j] .国际医学杂志;2010;31(7):714-731。doi: 10.1111 / iej.13736。Epub 2022 5月4日。PMID: 35334111;PMCID: PMC9322405)。对于裂缝,另一个回归点,取决于程度,可以在不提取的情况下进行管理。例如,这可能是牙尖保护或根管充填和牙尖保护,这是非常有效的(RKaur S, Puzhankara L, Shenoy N, Kini KS, Singhal DK)。挽救裂牙:牙裂综合征治疗方法综述。中国生物医学工程学报,2009,29(1):11-19。doi: 10.4103 / JCDE.JCDE_796_25。2026 1月10日。PMID: 41660023;PMCID: PMC12880780)。所以,我想说的是,即使“没有回头路”,现代牙科也非常善于成功地管理不归路。有许多不归的点,不像许多年前那样是一个“丧钟”。现代技术,如树脂渗透和预防方法,在防止牙齿从边缘倾斜方面非常有效。我很想知道你是否同意,还是我弄错了。请记住,我作为一名牙周病医生已经执业了25年,可能对牙科的所有其他方面都过时了,但据我所知,这篇社论的内容是我所能做到的事实正确的。我挑选了我认为适当的参考资料来支持我的论点。伊万·达比:构思,写作-原稿,写作-审查和编辑。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian dental journal
Australian dental journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Dental Journal provides a forum for the exchange of information about new and significant research in dentistry, promoting the discipline of dentistry in Australia and throughout the world. It comprises peer-reviewed research articles as its core material, supplemented by reviews, theoretical articles, special features and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书