Kelly K Storm, Robert B Flint, Wes Onland, Sylvia A Obermann-Borst, Jarinda A Poppe, Debbie H Nuytemans, Willem P de Boode, Katherine Carkeek, Vincent Cassart, Luc Cornette, Peter H Dijk, Marieke Ac Hemels, Matthias C Hütten, Dorottya Kelen, Ellen Hm de Kort, André A Kroon, Julie Lefevere, Katleen Plaskie, Sarah Verbeeck, Michiel Voeten, Olivia Williams, Inge A Zonnenberg, Arjan B Te Pas, Irwin Km Reiss, Anton H van Kaam, Karel Allegaert, Anne Smits, G Jeroen Hutten, Sinno Hp Simons
{"title":"Impact of changing open-label drug prescription policies on consent rates in a neonatal trial: a quasinatural experiment.","authors":"Kelly K Storm, Robert B Flint, Wes Onland, Sylvia A Obermann-Borst, Jarinda A Poppe, Debbie H Nuytemans, Willem P de Boode, Katherine Carkeek, Vincent Cassart, Luc Cornette, Peter H Dijk, Marieke Ac Hemels, Matthias C Hütten, Dorottya Kelen, Ellen Hm de Kort, André A Kroon, Julie Lefevere, Katleen Plaskie, Sarah Verbeeck, Michiel Voeten, Olivia Williams, Inge A Zonnenberg, Arjan B Te Pas, Irwin Km Reiss, Anton H van Kaam, Karel Allegaert, Anne Smits, G Jeroen Hutten, Sinno Hp Simons","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2026-330821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess how restricting open-label access to an off-label drug influences consent and trial enrolment in neonatal medicine.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicentre, quasinatural experiment.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seventeen neonatal intensive care units in the Netherlands and Belgium participating in the DOXA-trial, a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study of doxapram in extremely preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Infants born before 29 weeks' gestation whose parents were approached for DOXA-trial participation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Ten centres discontinued open-label doxapram outside the DOXA-trial (intervention centres), while seven continued its use (control centres).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Parental consent rates (proportion of parents who provided written informed consent among those approached) and patient enrolment rates (proportion of infants randomised among those whose parents were approached), compared 12 months before and after the policy change in intervention centres and before and after a corresponding reference point in control centres. The reference point in control centres was defined as the mean discontinuation date across intervention centres RESULTS: Overall consent rates increased from 27.8% to 37.1% after the intervention or reference point (+9.3, 95% CI 3.3 to 15.4, p=0.003). In intervention centres, the consent rates rose from 27.1% to 42.9% (+15.8, 95% CI 8.6 to 23.0, p<0.001) and enrolment rates rose proportionally from 9.9% to 16.6% (+6.7, 95% CI 1.5 to 11.9, p=0.011), whereas in control centres, consent and enrolment rates remained unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Restricting open-label access to an off-label investigational drug can substantially increase parental consent and patient enrolment in neonatal RCTs. To promote both ethical recruitment and optimal enrolment, future trials should explicitly discuss equipoise in each contributing unit and align local clinical practices with the trial design prior to initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330821","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess how restricting open-label access to an off-label drug influences consent and trial enrolment in neonatal medicine.
Design: Multicentre, quasinatural experiment.
Setting: Seventeen neonatal intensive care units in the Netherlands and Belgium participating in the DOXA-trial, a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study of doxapram in extremely preterm infants.
Patients: Infants born before 29 weeks' gestation whose parents were approached for DOXA-trial participation.
Interventions: Ten centres discontinued open-label doxapram outside the DOXA-trial (intervention centres), while seven continued its use (control centres).
Main outcome measures: Parental consent rates (proportion of parents who provided written informed consent among those approached) and patient enrolment rates (proportion of infants randomised among those whose parents were approached), compared 12 months before and after the policy change in intervention centres and before and after a corresponding reference point in control centres. The reference point in control centres was defined as the mean discontinuation date across intervention centres RESULTS: Overall consent rates increased from 27.8% to 37.1% after the intervention or reference point (+9.3, 95% CI 3.3 to 15.4, p=0.003). In intervention centres, the consent rates rose from 27.1% to 42.9% (+15.8, 95% CI 8.6 to 23.0, p<0.001) and enrolment rates rose proportionally from 9.9% to 16.6% (+6.7, 95% CI 1.5 to 11.9, p=0.011), whereas in control centres, consent and enrolment rates remained unchanged.
Conclusion: Restricting open-label access to an off-label investigational drug can substantially increase parental consent and patient enrolment in neonatal RCTs. To promote both ethical recruitment and optimal enrolment, future trials should explicitly discuss equipoise in each contributing unit and align local clinical practices with the trial design prior to initiation.
目的:评估限制非说明书药物的开放标签获取如何影响新生儿医学的同意和试验入组。设计:多中心、准自然实验。背景:荷兰和比利时的17个新生儿重症监护病房参与了doxa试验,这是一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的doxapram在极早产儿中的研究。患者:在妊娠29周之前出生的婴儿,其父母被告知参与doxa试验。干预措施:10个中心(干预中心)停止了doxa试验以外的开放标签doxapram,而7个中心(控制中心)继续使用它。主要结果测量:比较干预中心政策改变前后的12个月,以及控制中心相应参考点前后的12个月,父母同意率(接触者中提供书面知情同意的父母比例)和患者入组率(接触者中随机抽取的婴儿比例)。结果:干预后或参考点后,总体同意率从27.8%增加到37.1% (+9.3,95% CI 3.3至15.4,p=0.003)。在干预中心,同意率从27.1%上升到42.9% (+15.8,95% CI 8.6 - 23.0)。结论:限制非说明书研究药物的开放标签获取可显著增加新生儿随机对照试验的家长同意率和患者入组率。为了促进伦理招募和最佳入组,未来的试验应明确讨论每个贡献单位的平衡,并在开始前将当地临床实践与试验设计结合起来。
期刊介绍:
Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.