Diagnostic decision-making, vertebral augmentation, and osteoporosis therapy in vertebral compression fractures: a narrative review.

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Asian Spine Journal Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-11 DOI:10.31616/asj.2026.0108
Garcia Annette Findlay, Mark Ehioghae, Lancelot Benn, Alejandro Perez Albela, Theodore Quan, Bryce Alexander Basques, Aviram M Giladi, Kevin Yoon, Jonathan Paul Japa, Abdi Khalif, Addisu Mesfin
{"title":"Diagnostic decision-making, vertebral augmentation, and osteoporosis therapy in vertebral compression fractures: a narrative review.","authors":"Garcia Annette Findlay, Mark Ehioghae, Lancelot Benn, Alejandro Perez Albela, Theodore Quan, Bryce Alexander Basques, Aviram M Giladi, Kevin Yoon, Jonathan Paul Japa, Abdi Khalif, Addisu Mesfin","doi":"10.31616/asj.2026.0108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) represent the most prevalent osteoporotic fracture and constitute a growing cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization worldwide. Although often considered benign, VCFs are associated with chronic pain, progressive spinal deformity, functional impairment, decreased pulmonary capacity, and increased short- and long-term mortality, especially in older adults. Despite their high prevalence, key challenges persist regarding appropriate diagnostic evaluation, optimal treatment selection, and integration of osteoporosis management following fracture. This narrative review consolidates current evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic evaluation, management strategies, and public health implications of VCFs, with a focus on emerging spine-focused care models. VCFs predominantly result from compromised vertebral strength secondary to osteoporosis-related deterioration of trabecular microarchitecture, although traumatic and pathologic etiologies should also be considered. Diagnosis involves careful clinical assessment combined with imaging, with magnetic resonance imaging serving as a key modality for distinguishing acute fractures from chronic deformities or malignancy. Despite advances in diagnostic techniques, VCFs remain underrecognized and undertreated, contributing to avoidable disability and recurrent fractures. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence, highlighting practical considerations for clinical decisionmaking in VCF care. Particular emphasis is placed on differentiating acute symptomatic fractures from chronic deformities or pathologic collapse, identifying patients most likely to benefit from vertebral augmentation, and defining surgical indications in the setting of neurologic compromise, instability, or progressive deformity. Conservative management, incorporating analgesia, early mobilization, and rehabilitation, remains the first-line approach for most stable fractures. Vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty may provide short-term pain relief in carefully selected patients with persistent symptoms. However, the long-term benefits of augmentation and optimal patient selection criteria remain under investigation. Treatment options range from conservative measures-including analgesia, bracing, mobilization, rehabilitation, and osteoporosis-directed pharmacotherapy-to minimally invasive vertebral augmentation procedures such as vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty. Vertebral augmentation may provide short-term improvements in pain and function in appropriately selected patients, although its long-term benefits and optimal indications remain under investigation. Surgical decompression and stabilization are reserved for patients with neurological compromise, instability, or progressive deformity. From a public health perspective, deficiencies in osteoporosis screening, delayed diagnosis, and disparities in treatment access continue to affect diverse socioeconomic and racial groups. Emerging innovations, including fracture liaison services, risk stratification tools such as FRAX, and artificial intelligence-based predictive models, may enhance early detection and personalized care. VCFs represent sentinel manifestations of systemic skeletal fragility that warrant evaluation of underlying osteoporosis and implementation of secondary fracture prevention. Pharmacologic therapies, including antiresorptive and anabolic agents, play a key role in reducing recurrent fracture risk, although treatment selection should be individualized. Multidisciplinary, patient-centered strategies focused on early diagnosis, prevention, equitable care delivery, and standardized management are essential to address the growing global burden of VCFs. A structured, patient-centered approach to diagnosis, treatment selection, and post-fracture care may enhance outcomes and reduce the long-term burden associated with VCFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"768-781"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13547676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2026.0108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) represent the most prevalent osteoporotic fracture and constitute a growing cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization worldwide. Although often considered benign, VCFs are associated with chronic pain, progressive spinal deformity, functional impairment, decreased pulmonary capacity, and increased short- and long-term mortality, especially in older adults. Despite their high prevalence, key challenges persist regarding appropriate diagnostic evaluation, optimal treatment selection, and integration of osteoporosis management following fracture. This narrative review consolidates current evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic evaluation, management strategies, and public health implications of VCFs, with a focus on emerging spine-focused care models. VCFs predominantly result from compromised vertebral strength secondary to osteoporosis-related deterioration of trabecular microarchitecture, although traumatic and pathologic etiologies should also be considered. Diagnosis involves careful clinical assessment combined with imaging, with magnetic resonance imaging serving as a key modality for distinguishing acute fractures from chronic deformities or malignancy. Despite advances in diagnostic techniques, VCFs remain underrecognized and undertreated, contributing to avoidable disability and recurrent fractures. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence, highlighting practical considerations for clinical decisionmaking in VCF care. Particular emphasis is placed on differentiating acute symptomatic fractures from chronic deformities or pathologic collapse, identifying patients most likely to benefit from vertebral augmentation, and defining surgical indications in the setting of neurologic compromise, instability, or progressive deformity. Conservative management, incorporating analgesia, early mobilization, and rehabilitation, remains the first-line approach for most stable fractures. Vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty may provide short-term pain relief in carefully selected patients with persistent symptoms. However, the long-term benefits of augmentation and optimal patient selection criteria remain under investigation. Treatment options range from conservative measures-including analgesia, bracing, mobilization, rehabilitation, and osteoporosis-directed pharmacotherapy-to minimally invasive vertebral augmentation procedures such as vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty. Vertebral augmentation may provide short-term improvements in pain and function in appropriately selected patients, although its long-term benefits and optimal indications remain under investigation. Surgical decompression and stabilization are reserved for patients with neurological compromise, instability, or progressive deformity. From a public health perspective, deficiencies in osteoporosis screening, delayed diagnosis, and disparities in treatment access continue to affect diverse socioeconomic and racial groups. Emerging innovations, including fracture liaison services, risk stratification tools such as FRAX, and artificial intelligence-based predictive models, may enhance early detection and personalized care. VCFs represent sentinel manifestations of systemic skeletal fragility that warrant evaluation of underlying osteoporosis and implementation of secondary fracture prevention. Pharmacologic therapies, including antiresorptive and anabolic agents, play a key role in reducing recurrent fracture risk, although treatment selection should be individualized. Multidisciplinary, patient-centered strategies focused on early diagnosis, prevention, equitable care delivery, and standardized management are essential to address the growing global burden of VCFs. A structured, patient-centered approach to diagnosis, treatment selection, and post-fracture care may enhance outcomes and reduce the long-term burden associated with VCFs.

椎体压缩性骨折的诊断决策、椎体增强和骨质疏松治疗:叙述性回顾。
椎体压缩性骨折(vcf)是最常见的骨质疏松性骨折,并且在世界范围内成为发病率、死亡率和医疗保健利用率日益增长的原因。虽然通常被认为是良性的,但vcf与慢性疼痛、进行性脊柱畸形、功能损害、肺容量下降以及短期和长期死亡率增加有关,尤其是在老年人中。尽管患病率很高,但在适当的诊断评估、最佳治疗选择和骨折后骨质疏松症综合治疗方面仍然存在关键挑战。这篇叙述性综述整合了目前关于vcf的流行病学、病理生理学、诊断评估、管理策略和公共卫生影响的证据,重点是新兴的以脊柱为中心的护理模式。vcf主要是由骨质疏松相关的小梁微结构恶化继发的椎体强度受损引起的,尽管也应考虑创伤和病理病因。诊断包括仔细的临床评估和影像学,磁共振成像是区分急性骨折与慢性畸形或恶性肿瘤的关键手段。尽管诊断技术有所进步,但vcf仍未得到充分认识和治疗,导致可避免的残疾和复发性骨折。这篇叙述性综述综合了当代证据,强调了VCF治疗中临床决策的实际考虑。特别强调的是区分急性症状性骨折与慢性畸形或病理性塌陷,确定最有可能从椎体增强术中获益的患者,并确定神经系统受损、不稳定或进行性畸形的手术指征。保守治疗,包括镇痛、早期活动和康复,仍然是大多数稳定骨折的一线治疗方法。椎体成形术和球囊后凸成形术可以在有持续症状的患者中提供短期的疼痛缓解。然而,增强的长期效益和最佳患者选择标准仍在研究中。治疗选择包括保守措施(包括镇痛、支具、活动、康复和骨质疏松定向药物治疗)到微创椎体增大手术(如椎体成形术和球囊后凸成形术)。椎体增强术可以在适当选择的患者中提供疼痛和功能的短期改善,尽管其长期益处和最佳适应症仍在研究中。手术减压和稳定用于神经损伤、不稳定或进行性畸形的患者。从公共卫生的角度来看,骨质疏松症筛查的不足、诊断的延迟和治疗机会的差异继续影响着不同的社会经济和种族群体。裂缝联络服务、FRAX等风险分层工具和基于人工智能的预测模型等新兴创新技术,可能会增强早期发现和个性化护理。vcf代表了系统性骨骼脆弱的前哨表现,需要评估潜在的骨质疏松症和实施二级骨折预防。药物治疗,包括抗吸收和合成代谢药物,在降低复发性骨折风险方面起着关键作用,尽管治疗选择应该个体化。多学科、以患者为中心的战略侧重于早期诊断、预防、公平护理提供和标准化管理,这对于解决日益严重的病毒性脊灰疾病全球负担至关重要。结构化的、以患者为中心的诊断、治疗选择和骨折后护理方法可以提高预后并减少与vcf相关的长期负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书