Enhancing the accuracy of a multivariable prediction model to identify medical patients suitable for same day emergency care services.

IF 6.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Catherine Atkin, Suzy Gallier, James Hodson, L Li, Felicity Evison, Vinay Reddy-Kolanu, Elizabeth Sapey
{"title":"Enhancing the accuracy of a multivariable prediction model to identify medical patients suitable for same day emergency care services.","authors":"Catherine Atkin, Suzy Gallier, James Hodson, L Li, Felicity Evison, Vinay Reddy-Kolanu, Elizabeth Sapey","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the performance of the Glasgow admission prediction score (GAPS) and ambulatory score (AmbS) for identifying emergency department (ED) attendances suitable for medical same day emergency care (SDEC) services and to derive and validate a novel tool for this purpose, the SDEC Triage Tool (SDEC-T).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective diagnostic study using routine healthcare data from three hospitals in a diverse urban setting (Birmingham, UK). All unplanned ED attendances by adults requiring internal medicine assessment were included. The primary outcome was suitability for SDEC, defined as discharged alive with a length of stay under 12 hours (LOS<12). The SDEC-T was derived using multivariable analysis, informed by stakeholder workshops.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>152 877 attendances were included (median age: 58 years; 54.3% female; 68.4% White ethnicity); LOS <12 was achieved in 45.0% (n=68 752). The GAPS and AmbS had moderate predictive accuracy, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) of 0.741 (95% CI 0.738 to 0.744) and 0.733 (95% CI 0.730 to 0.736), respectively. The SDEC-T comprised elements of the GAPS, AmbS, National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and presenting complaint and achieved an AUROC of 0.850 (95% CI 0.845 to 0.854) on internal validation. Stakeholders considered the tool acceptable and suitable for deployment across settings.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The SDEC-T demonstrated improved discrimination using routinely available variables, balancing predictive performance with clinical practicality. Its design supports implementation across hospitals with varying digital maturity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a diverse patient cohort, the SDEC-T outperformed existing tools for identifying patients suitable for medical SDEC services.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13475099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the performance of the Glasgow admission prediction score (GAPS) and ambulatory score (AmbS) for identifying emergency department (ED) attendances suitable for medical same day emergency care (SDEC) services and to derive and validate a novel tool for this purpose, the SDEC Triage Tool (SDEC-T).

Methods: A retrospective diagnostic study using routine healthcare data from three hospitals in a diverse urban setting (Birmingham, UK). All unplanned ED attendances by adults requiring internal medicine assessment were included. The primary outcome was suitability for SDEC, defined as discharged alive with a length of stay under 12 hours (LOS<12). The SDEC-T was derived using multivariable analysis, informed by stakeholder workshops.

Results: 152 877 attendances were included (median age: 58 years; 54.3% female; 68.4% White ethnicity); LOS <12 was achieved in 45.0% (n=68 752). The GAPS and AmbS had moderate predictive accuracy, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) of 0.741 (95% CI 0.738 to 0.744) and 0.733 (95% CI 0.730 to 0.736), respectively. The SDEC-T comprised elements of the GAPS, AmbS, National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and presenting complaint and achieved an AUROC of 0.850 (95% CI 0.845 to 0.854) on internal validation. Stakeholders considered the tool acceptable and suitable for deployment across settings.

Discussion: The SDEC-T demonstrated improved discrimination using routinely available variables, balancing predictive performance with clinical practicality. Its design supports implementation across hospitals with varying digital maturity.

Conclusions: In a diverse patient cohort, the SDEC-T outperformed existing tools for identifying patients suitable for medical SDEC services.

提高多变量预测模型的准确性,以确定适合当日紧急护理服务的医疗患者。
目的:评估格拉斯哥入院预测评分(GAPS)和门诊评分(AmbS)的性能,以确定适合医疗当日紧急护理(SDEC)服务的急诊科(ED)出诊人数,并为此目的派生和验证一种新工具,SDEC分诊工具(SDEC- t)。方法:回顾性诊断研究使用常规医疗保健数据从三家医院在不同的城市设置(伯明翰,英国)。所有需要内科评估的成年人的计划外急诊科就诊都包括在内。主要终点是SDEC的适宜性,定义为存活出院且住院时间小于12小时(los结果:纳入152877例患者(中位年龄:58岁,54.3%为女性,68.4%为白人);LOS讨论:SDEC-T使用常规可用变量证明了更好的识别,平衡了预测性能和临床实用性。它的设计支持不同数字成熟度的医院之间的实施。结论:在不同的患者队列中,SDEC- t在识别适合医疗SDEC服务的患者方面优于现有工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书