The right to function at end of life: aligning advance care planning with palliative rehabilitation.

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing
Annals of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-08 DOI:10.21037/apm-2026-1-0022
Christopher M Wilson, Ann M Henshaw, Mark C Navin
{"title":"The right to function at end of life: aligning advance care planning with palliative rehabilitation.","authors":"Christopher M Wilson, Ann M Henshaw, Mark C Navin","doi":"10.21037/apm-2026-1-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Movement and bodily autonomy are integral to life and participation in meaningful activities. Current advance care planning (ACP) and advance directive processes do not consistently elicit discussions or documentation about these topics. The problem is especially serious when continued movement increases the risk of falling or other negative health events. This review article integrates available evidence and the authors' clinical experience to argue that ACP should include functional goals and that rehabilitation professionals should be regular members of end-of-life care teams. We address clinical, ethical, and system-level barriers to change and we present a composite case vignette to illustrate the implications and complexities that can occur when function and bodily autonomy are not considered during ACP activities. Rehabilitation providers such as physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language pathologists provide support and interventions to help mitigate risk while facilitating functional independence. However, because discussions around mobility goals at the end of life do not consistently occur, rehabilitation professionals are inconsistently involved as care team members for people who are dying. Without access to rehabilitation, patients may face well-intentioned but overly restrictive care decisions that limit their participation in meaningful life activities. Including functional priorities in ACP, and rehabilitation professionals on care teams, will better align end-of-life care with what dying patients value.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":"15 4","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-2026-1-0022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Movement and bodily autonomy are integral to life and participation in meaningful activities. Current advance care planning (ACP) and advance directive processes do not consistently elicit discussions or documentation about these topics. The problem is especially serious when continued movement increases the risk of falling or other negative health events. This review article integrates available evidence and the authors' clinical experience to argue that ACP should include functional goals and that rehabilitation professionals should be regular members of end-of-life care teams. We address clinical, ethical, and system-level barriers to change and we present a composite case vignette to illustrate the implications and complexities that can occur when function and bodily autonomy are not considered during ACP activities. Rehabilitation providers such as physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language pathologists provide support and interventions to help mitigate risk while facilitating functional independence. However, because discussions around mobility goals at the end of life do not consistently occur, rehabilitation professionals are inconsistently involved as care team members for people who are dying. Without access to rehabilitation, patients may face well-intentioned but overly restrictive care decisions that limit their participation in meaningful life activities. Including functional priorities in ACP, and rehabilitation professionals on care teams, will better align end-of-life care with what dying patients value.

生命末期行使功能的权利:将预先护理计划与姑息康复相结合。
运动和身体自主是生活和参与有意义活动不可或缺的一部分。目前的预先护理计划(ACP)和预先指示流程并没有一致地引发关于这些主题的讨论或记录。当持续运动增加跌倒或其他负面健康事件的风险时,这个问题尤其严重。这篇综述文章整合了现有的证据和作者的临床经验,认为ACP应该包括功能目标,康复专业人员应该是临终关怀团队的常规成员。我们讨论了临床、伦理和系统层面的改变障碍,并提出了一个综合案例,以说明在ACP活动中不考虑功能和身体自主时可能发生的影响和复杂性。康复服务提供者,如物理治疗师,职业治疗师和语言病理学家提供支持和干预,以帮助减轻风险,同时促进功能独立。然而,由于关于生命结束时行动目标的讨论并不总是发生,康复专业人员不总是作为临终者的护理团队成员参与其中。如果无法获得康复治疗,患者可能会面临本意良好但限制过多的护理决定,从而限制他们参与有意义的生活活动。包括ACP的功能优先级,以及护理团队中的康复专业人员,将更好地将临终关怀与临终患者的价值结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书