Differences in the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) measurements using long-leg radiographs and computed tomography

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Kohei Kawaguchi, Mei Lin Tay, Simon Young
{"title":"Differences in the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) measurements using long-leg radiographs and computed tomography","authors":"Kohei Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Mei Lin Tay,&nbsp;Simon Young","doi":"10.1007/s00402-026-06463-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) parameters are increasingly used to characterize native coronal alignment and guide alignment strategies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on long-leg radiographs (LLR). Computed tomography (CT) based robotic TKA software enables calculation of CPAK parameters based on anatomical reference points. However, potential differences in CPAK measurements between LLR and CT remain incompletely defined. This study compared CPAK coronal alignment parameters and phenotype distributions between LLR and CT, and evaluated factors associated with measurement discrepancies.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a radiographic subanalysis of a prospective randomised controlled trial including 241 patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA. Medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were measured and arithmetic hip-knee-ankle-angle (aHKA), joint line obliquity (JLO) and CPAK phenotype distribution were calculated and classified from preoperative LLR and CT. Discrepancy groups were defined as LLR = CT (≤ 2°), LLR &lt; CT (&gt; 2°) and LLR &gt; CT (&gt; 2°). Associations between discrepancy groups and preoperative deformity and flexion contracture were assessed.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared with LLR, CT demonstrated a more varus MPTA (mean 86.7° vs. 87.1°, <i>p</i> = 0.04), a more valgus LDFA (87.1° vs. 87.8°, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and a lower JLO (173.9° vs. 174.9°, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The aHKA did not differ between modalities. There was a higher overall proportion of apex distal phenotypes (Types I–III) on CT (<i>p</i> = 0.01), and in particular CPAK Type II phenotypes were more frequent on CT than LLR (45.2% vs. 33.2%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). For MPTA, the proportions of LLR = CT, LLR &gt; CT, and LLR &lt; CT were 66.0%, 21.6% and 12.4%, respectively; corresponding LDFA proportions were 84.6%, 13.3% and 2.1%. In MPTA discrepancy, LLR &gt; CT groups showed more preoperative valgus alignment and LLR &lt; CT group showed more preoperative varus alignment with knee flexion contracture.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CPAK coronal alignment parameters and phenotype distributions differ depending on whether measurements are derived from LLR or CT. Discrepancies in MPTA are influenced by preoperative coronal knee alignment and flexion contracture. Surgeons should interpret CT- and LLR-based CPAK assessments with caution, particularly in patients with moderate deformity or flexion contracture.</p><h3>Level III</h3><p>Retrospective Cohort study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"146 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-026-06463-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-026-06463-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) parameters are increasingly used to characterize native coronal alignment and guide alignment strategies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on long-leg radiographs (LLR). Computed tomography (CT) based robotic TKA software enables calculation of CPAK parameters based on anatomical reference points. However, potential differences in CPAK measurements between LLR and CT remain incompletely defined. This study compared CPAK coronal alignment parameters and phenotype distributions between LLR and CT, and evaluated factors associated with measurement discrepancies.

Methods

This was a radiographic subanalysis of a prospective randomised controlled trial including 241 patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA. Medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were measured and arithmetic hip-knee-ankle-angle (aHKA), joint line obliquity (JLO) and CPAK phenotype distribution were calculated and classified from preoperative LLR and CT. Discrepancy groups were defined as LLR = CT (≤ 2°), LLR < CT (> 2°) and LLR > CT (> 2°). Associations between discrepancy groups and preoperative deformity and flexion contracture were assessed.

Results

Compared with LLR, CT demonstrated a more varus MPTA (mean 86.7° vs. 87.1°, p = 0.04), a more valgus LDFA (87.1° vs. 87.8°, p < 0.01) and a lower JLO (173.9° vs. 174.9°, p < 0.01). The aHKA did not differ between modalities. There was a higher overall proportion of apex distal phenotypes (Types I–III) on CT (p = 0.01), and in particular CPAK Type II phenotypes were more frequent on CT than LLR (45.2% vs. 33.2%; p < 0.01). For MPTA, the proportions of LLR = CT, LLR > CT, and LLR < CT were 66.0%, 21.6% and 12.4%, respectively; corresponding LDFA proportions were 84.6%, 13.3% and 2.1%. In MPTA discrepancy, LLR > CT groups showed more preoperative valgus alignment and LLR < CT group showed more preoperative varus alignment with knee flexion contracture.

Conclusion

CPAK coronal alignment parameters and phenotype distributions differ depending on whether measurements are derived from LLR or CT. Discrepancies in MPTA are influenced by preoperative coronal knee alignment and flexion contracture. Surgeons should interpret CT- and LLR-based CPAK assessments with caution, particularly in patients with moderate deformity or flexion contracture.

Level III

Retrospective Cohort study.

使用长腿x线片和计算机断层扫描测量膝关节冠状面排列(CPAK)的差异。
导论:基于长腿x线片(LLR)的全膝关节置换术(TKA)中,膝关节冠状面对齐(CPAK)参数越来越多地用于表征天然冠状面对齐和指导对齐策略。基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的机器人TKA软件可以根据解剖参考点计算CPAK参数。然而,LLR和CT测量CPAK的潜在差异仍然不完全确定。本研究比较了LLR和CT的CPAK冠状排列参数和表型分布,并评估了测量差异的相关因素。方法:这是一项前瞻性随机对照试验的影像学亚分析,其中包括241名接受机器人辅助TKA的患者。测量胫骨内侧近端角(MPTA)和股骨外侧远端角(LDFA),计算髋关节-膝关节-踝关节算术角(aHKA)、关节线倾角(JLO)和CPAK表型分布,并根据术前LLR和CT进行分类。差异组定义为LLR = CT(≤2°),LLR 2°)和LLR > CT(> 2°)。评估差异组与术前畸形和屈曲挛缩之间的关系。结果:与LLR相比,CT显示更多的MPTA内翻(平均86.7°vs. 87.1°,p = 0.04),更多的LDFA外翻(87.1°vs. 87.8°,p CT和LLR CT组显示更多的术前外翻排列和LLR结论:CPAK冠状排列参数和表型分布取决于来自LLR还是CT的测量结果。术前冠状面膝关节对齐和屈曲挛缩影响MPTA差异。外科医生应谨慎解读基于CT和llr的CPAK评估,特别是对于中度畸形或屈曲挛缩的患者。iii级:回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书