Feasibility and Effects of a Produce Prescription Program (PRx) in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Low Socioeconomic Status: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-10 DOI:10.1111/dom.71185
Carmen A W Dietvorst, Zuzanna Zielinska, Raief Ahmadkhan, Robin P Peeters, Manuel Castro Cabezas, Kirsten A Berk
{"title":"Feasibility and Effects of a Produce Prescription Program (PRx) in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Low Socioeconomic Status: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial.","authors":"Carmen A W Dietvorst, Zuzanna Zielinska, Raief Ahmadkhan, Robin P Peeters, Manuel Castro Cabezas, Kirsten A Berk","doi":"10.1111/dom.71185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Financial constraints often limit healthy eating among individuals with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and lower socioeconomic status (SES). Produce Prescription Programs (PRx), which provide financial support for healthy foods, have shown promise in the United States but remain understudied in Europe. This study assessed the feasibility of a 3-month PRx intervention among adults with T2D and low SES, and explored its potential effects on dietary intake, metabolic outcomes and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this 3-month RCT, conducted in primary care in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, adults with T2D, BMI > 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and low SES were assigned to either PRx or usual care. Both groups received three dietitian consultations and were advised to follow a Mediterranean diet. PRx additionally provided weekly plant-based food boxes, cooking workshops and educational support. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, adherence and acceptability. Exploratory efficacy outcomes included nutritional intake, anthropometric measures, metabolic outcomes and quality of life at three and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven individuals were screened and 35 participants (57.3 ± 11.8 years; 74% female; BMI 32.6 ± 6.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were included, of whom 17 were allocated to PRx. Participants collected an average of 10.9 out of 12 food boxes (91%) and attended 1.8 out of 3 workshops (59%). Among the 11 participants (69%) who completed the evaluation questionnaire, satisfaction scores ranged from 4.3 to 4.7 out of 5. Exploratory between-group comparisons favoured the PRx group for dietary intake, weight, BMI and physical quality of life, while no clear differences were observed for glycaemic outcomes. These findings were supported by favourable within-group changes in dietary and anthropometric outcomes in the PRx group, several of which appeared to be maintained at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot RCT demonstrates that a 3-month PRx intervention providing plant-based food boxes is feasible and acceptable among adults with T2D and low SES. As the first European RCT evaluating a PRx intervention in this population, it provides preliminary evidence of potential benefits for dietary, anthropometric and quality of life outcomes, warranting further investigation in adequately powered trials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>OMON: NL-OMON57037; 8 October 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"9991-10000"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13646382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.71185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Financial constraints often limit healthy eating among individuals with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and lower socioeconomic status (SES). Produce Prescription Programs (PRx), which provide financial support for healthy foods, have shown promise in the United States but remain understudied in Europe. This study assessed the feasibility of a 3-month PRx intervention among adults with T2D and low SES, and explored its potential effects on dietary intake, metabolic outcomes and quality of life.

Materials and methods: In this 3-month RCT, conducted in primary care in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, adults with T2D, BMI > 25 kg/m2 and low SES were assigned to either PRx or usual care. Both groups received three dietitian consultations and were advised to follow a Mediterranean diet. PRx additionally provided weekly plant-based food boxes, cooking workshops and educational support. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, adherence and acceptability. Exploratory efficacy outcomes included nutritional intake, anthropometric measures, metabolic outcomes and quality of life at three and 6 months.

Results: Seventy-seven individuals were screened and 35 participants (57.3 ± 11.8 years; 74% female; BMI 32.6 ± 6.0 kg/m2) were included, of whom 17 were allocated to PRx. Participants collected an average of 10.9 out of 12 food boxes (91%) and attended 1.8 out of 3 workshops (59%). Among the 11 participants (69%) who completed the evaluation questionnaire, satisfaction scores ranged from 4.3 to 4.7 out of 5. Exploratory between-group comparisons favoured the PRx group for dietary intake, weight, BMI and physical quality of life, while no clear differences were observed for glycaemic outcomes. These findings were supported by favourable within-group changes in dietary and anthropometric outcomes in the PRx group, several of which appeared to be maintained at 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions: This pilot RCT demonstrates that a 3-month PRx intervention providing plant-based food boxes is feasible and acceptable among adults with T2D and low SES. As the first European RCT evaluating a PRx intervention in this population, it provides preliminary evidence of potential benefits for dietary, anthropometric and quality of life outcomes, warranting further investigation in adequately powered trials.

Trial registration: OMON: NL-OMON57037; 8 October 2024.

生产处方计划(PRx)在2型糖尿病和低社会经济地位人群中的可行性和效果:一项随机对照试点试验
目的:经济拮据经常限制2型糖尿病(T2D)和低社会经济地位(SES)患者的健康饮食。生产处方计划(PRx)为健康食品提供财政支持,在美国已经显示出希望,但在欧洲仍未得到充分研究。本研究评估了T2D和低SES成人患者3个月PRx干预的可行性,并探讨了其对饮食摄入、代谢结局和生活质量的潜在影响。材料和方法:在荷兰鹿特丹的初级保健中心进行的这项为期3个月的随机对照试验中,t2dm、BMI bb0 25 kg/m2和低SES的成年人被分配到PRx或常规护理组。两组都接受了三次营养师咨询,并被建议遵循地中海饮食。此外,PRx每周还提供植物性食品盒、烹饪工作坊和教育支持。可行性结果包括招募、保留、依从性和可接受性。探索性疗效结果包括营养摄入、人体测量、代谢结果和3个月和6个月的生活质量。结果:共筛选77例受试者,纳入35例(57.3±11.8岁,女性74%,BMI 32.6±6.0 kg/m2),其中17例被分配到PRx组。参与者平均收集了12个食品盒中的10.9个(91%),参加了3个讲习班中的1.8个(59%)。在完成评估问卷的11名参与者(69%)中,满意度得分在4.3到4.7分(满分5分)之间。探索性组间比较在饮食摄入、体重、BMI和身体生活质量方面有利于PRx组,而在血糖结局方面没有观察到明显差异。这些发现得到了PRx组饮食和人体测量结果的有利组内变化的支持,其中一些似乎在6个月的随访中保持不变。结论:本试验RCT表明,提供植物性食品盒的为期3个月的PRx干预对T2D和低SES的成年人是可行和可接受的。作为欧洲首个评估该人群PRx干预的RCT,它为饮食、人体测量和生活质量结果的潜在益处提供了初步证据,值得在充分有力的试验中进一步研究。试验注册:OMON: NL-OMON57037;2024年10月8日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书