A Novel Framework for Reliability Analysis of Rainfall-Induced Slopes Failure Based on Site-Specific Data

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Rui Yang, Yanan Meng, Guoqing Cai, Jinsong Huang
{"title":"A Novel Framework for Reliability Analysis of Rainfall-Induced Slopes Failure Based on Site-Specific Data","authors":"Rui Yang,&nbsp;Yanan Meng,&nbsp;Guoqing Cai,&nbsp;Jinsong Huang","doi":"10.1002/nag.70370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Rainfall-induced slope failure is governed by complex multivariate interactions and inherent spatial variability of soil properties. However, conventional Gaussian-based reliability models fail to capture the nonlinear dependencies between hydraulic and mechanical parameters and cannot fully utilize limited site-specific data. This paper develops a Copula-based conditional random field (Copula-CRF) framework that explicitly incorporates multivariate non-Gaussian dependencies and maximizes the use of site-specific data in probabilistic slope stability evaluation. The framework first identifies optimal Copula structures for multivariate parameters based on site-specific data and then embeds the identified dependence models into a conditional random field to generate spatially correlated realizations constrained on both hydraulic and mechanical observations. A representative slope case exhibiting failure is analyzed to evaluate the performance of the proposed approach. The Copula-URF approach yields a failure probability of 0.22, whereas the Copula-CRF approach yields 0.911, accompanied by a reduction in standard deviation from 0.207 to 0.023. The results indicate that the Copula-CRF framework provides more realistic reliability estimates than Copula-URF approaches by fully utilizing available site-specific data. The performance of the proposed framework is evaluated under varying parameter uncertainties, spatial correlations, rainfall patterns, and site investigation schemes, confirming the robustness and applicability of the approach. Applications of the proposed Copula-CRF framework demonstrate that it can reliably evaluate the stability of rainfall-induced slopes with site-specific data. The method also provides a general reference for reliability analysis and risk-informed decision-making in geotechnical engineering.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"50 13","pages":"5213-5229"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.70370","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rainfall-induced slope failure is governed by complex multivariate interactions and inherent spatial variability of soil properties. However, conventional Gaussian-based reliability models fail to capture the nonlinear dependencies between hydraulic and mechanical parameters and cannot fully utilize limited site-specific data. This paper develops a Copula-based conditional random field (Copula-CRF) framework that explicitly incorporates multivariate non-Gaussian dependencies and maximizes the use of site-specific data in probabilistic slope stability evaluation. The framework first identifies optimal Copula structures for multivariate parameters based on site-specific data and then embeds the identified dependence models into a conditional random field to generate spatially correlated realizations constrained on both hydraulic and mechanical observations. A representative slope case exhibiting failure is analyzed to evaluate the performance of the proposed approach. The Copula-URF approach yields a failure probability of 0.22, whereas the Copula-CRF approach yields 0.911, accompanied by a reduction in standard deviation from 0.207 to 0.023. The results indicate that the Copula-CRF framework provides more realistic reliability estimates than Copula-URF approaches by fully utilizing available site-specific data. The performance of the proposed framework is evaluated under varying parameter uncertainties, spatial correlations, rainfall patterns, and site investigation schemes, confirming the robustness and applicability of the approach. Applications of the proposed Copula-CRF framework demonstrate that it can reliably evaluate the stability of rainfall-induced slopes with site-specific data. The method also provides a general reference for reliability analysis and risk-informed decision-making in geotechnical engineering.

基于场地数据的降雨诱发边坡失稳可靠度分析新框架
降雨引起的边坡破坏是由复杂的多元相互作用和土壤性质固有的空间变异性控制的。然而,传统的基于高斯的可靠性模型不能捕捉水力和力学参数之间的非线性依赖关系,也不能充分利用有限的现场特定数据。本文开发了一个基于copula的条件随机场(Copula-CRF)框架,该框架明确地纳入了多元非高斯依赖关系,并在概率边坡稳定性评估中最大化地利用了特定场地的数据。该框架首先根据现场特定数据识别多变量参数的最优Copula结构,然后将识别的依赖模型嵌入到条件随机场中,以生成受水力和力学观测约束的空间相关实现。分析了一个典型的边坡破坏实例,以评价该方法的性能。Copula-URF方法的失败概率为0.22,而Copula-CRF方法的失败概率为0.911,同时标准差从0.207降低到0.023。结果表明,与Copula-URF方法相比,Copula-CRF框架通过充分利用现有的站点特定数据提供了更现实的可靠性估计。在不同的参数不确定性、空间相关性、降雨模式和现场调查方案下,评估了所提出框架的性能,证实了该方法的稳健性和适用性。本文提出的Copula-CRF框架的应用表明,该框架能够可靠地评价降雨诱发边坡的稳定性。该方法可为岩土工程的可靠性分析和风险决策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书