A Novel Multilevel Conceptual Framework for Flood Risk Governance

IF 3.4 3区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Environmental Policy and Governance Pub Date : 2026-08-11 Epub Date: 2026-05-04 DOI:10.1002/eet.70086
Aiperi Stambekova, Avidesh Seenath
{"title":"A Novel Multilevel Conceptual Framework for Flood Risk Governance","authors":"Aiperi Stambekova,&nbsp;Avidesh Seenath","doi":"10.1002/eet.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Globally, flood risk is increasing as climate change progresses. Contemporary flood risk management practice often utilises hydrodynamic modelling (for hazard risk assessments), social vulnerability assessments, and risk communications in silo, which fragments evidence-based decision-making for effective flood risk management. We hence develop a multilevel flood risk governance framework that integrates flood Hazard modelling (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>H</mi>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>), social Vulnerability assessments (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>V</mi>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>) and risk Communication (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>C</mi>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>) through three cores, three pairwise interfaces, and a central decision-ready space. We provide a conceptual illustration of how the framework can be operationalised before discussing the wider theoretical and practical implications of it in terms of its ability to better guide flood risk governance. Our conceptual framework treats <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>C</mi>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> as coequal with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>H</mi>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>V</mi>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and specifies information flows between them to support more timely, accountable decisions for flood risk governance. Our illustration outlines a minimal-data workflow based on open-access data sources and transparent assumptions, showing how uncertainty at different stages can be presented and acted upon in resource and capacity-constrained environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"36 4","pages":"855-870"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.70086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Policy and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.70086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, flood risk is increasing as climate change progresses. Contemporary flood risk management practice often utilises hydrodynamic modelling (for hazard risk assessments), social vulnerability assessments, and risk communications in silo, which fragments evidence-based decision-making for effective flood risk management. We hence develop a multilevel flood risk governance framework that integrates flood Hazard modelling ( H ), social Vulnerability assessments ( V ) and risk Communication ( C ) through three cores, three pairwise interfaces, and a central decision-ready space. We provide a conceptual illustration of how the framework can be operationalised before discussing the wider theoretical and practical implications of it in terms of its ability to better guide flood risk governance. Our conceptual framework treats C as coequal with H and V and specifies information flows between them to support more timely, accountable decisions for flood risk governance. Our illustration outlines a minimal-data workflow based on open-access data sources and transparent assumptions, showing how uncertainty at different stages can be presented and acted upon in resource and capacity-constrained environments.

洪水风险治理的多层次概念框架
在全球范围内,随着气候变化的进展,洪水风险正在增加。当代洪水风险管理实践经常使用水动力模型(用于灾害风险评估)、社会脆弱性评估和风险沟通,这使得有效的洪水风险管理的循证决策支离破碎。因此,我们开发了一个多层次的洪水风险治理框架,通过三个核心,三个配对接口,将洪水风险建模(H),社会脆弱性评估(V)和风险沟通(C)集成在一起,还有一个中央决策空间。在讨论该框架在更好地指导洪水风险治理方面的能力方面的更广泛的理论和实践意义之前,我们提供了一个概念性的说明,说明该框架如何可操作性。我们的概念框架将C与H和V等同,并指定它们之间的信息流,以支持更及时、更负责任的洪水风险治理决策。我们的插图概述了基于开放获取数据源和透明假设的最小数据工作流,展示了如何在资源和能力受限的环境中呈现不同阶段的不确定性并采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Policy and Governance
Environmental Policy and Governance ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Environmental Policy and Governance is an international, inter-disciplinary journal affiliated with the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE). The journal seeks to advance interdisciplinary environmental research and its use to support novel solutions in environmental policy and governance. The journal publishes innovative, high quality articles which examine, or are relevant to, the environmental policies that are introduced by governments or the diverse forms of environmental governance that emerge in markets and civil society. The journal includes papers that examine how different forms of policy and governance emerge and exert influence at scales ranging from local to global and in diverse developmental and environmental contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书