Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: A randomized-controlled trial.

Mansi Tomar, Anju Romina Bhalotra, Snigdha Singh, Rahil Singh
{"title":"Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: A randomized-controlled trial.","authors":"Mansi Tomar, Anju Romina Bhalotra, Snigdha Singh, Rahil Singh","doi":"10.5606/agri.2026.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to assess the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) under spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this randomized-controlled trial, a total of 30 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I-III, 20 to 65 years) who underwent elective unilateral THA under spinal anesthesia were included between January 2023 and December 2023. The patients were randomized either to Group E (n = 15) to receive ultrasound-guided lumbar ESPB with 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine in addition to spinal anesthesia (2.5 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 10 µg of fentanyl), or Group C (n = 15) who received spinal anesthesia alone. Primary outcomes were duration of analgesia and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at 6 h. Secondary outcomes included VAS scores at 0, 0.5, 2, 4, 12, 24 h and total additional analgesic requirement in the first 24 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 30 patients included in the study, 22 were male and 8 were female with a mean age of 36.86 ± 13.24 (range, 18 to 65) years. The duration of analgesia was significantly longer in group E (10.76 ± 1.96 h vs. 4.18 ± 1.36 h; p < 0.01). The VAS scores were lower in group E at 0.5 h (p = 0.009), 2 h (p < 0.001), 4 h (p < 0.001), 6 h (p < 0.001), and 12 h (p = 0.02). Additional analgesic requirement during the first 24 h was higher in Group C. Surgeon and patient satisfaction scores significantly improved in Group E. No hemodynamic instability or motor weakness was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lumbar ESPB with 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine significantly prolongs postoperative analgesia and reduces pain scores and analgesic consumption in patients undergoing THA under spinal anesthesia. Based on these findings, lumbar ESPB may provide effective and safe adjunctive analgesia in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":101341,"journal":{"name":"Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","volume":"38 3","pages":"188-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/agri.2026.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to assess the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) under spinal anesthesia.

Patients and methods: In this randomized-controlled trial, a total of 30 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I-III, 20 to 65 years) who underwent elective unilateral THA under spinal anesthesia were included between January 2023 and December 2023. The patients were randomized either to Group E (n = 15) to receive ultrasound-guided lumbar ESPB with 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine in addition to spinal anesthesia (2.5 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 10 µg of fentanyl), or Group C (n = 15) who received spinal anesthesia alone. Primary outcomes were duration of analgesia and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at 6 h. Secondary outcomes included VAS scores at 0, 0.5, 2, 4, 12, 24 h and total additional analgesic requirement in the first 24 h.

Results: Of a total of 30 patients included in the study, 22 were male and 8 were female with a mean age of 36.86 ± 13.24 (range, 18 to 65) years. The duration of analgesia was significantly longer in group E (10.76 ± 1.96 h vs. 4.18 ± 1.36 h; p < 0.01). The VAS scores were lower in group E at 0.5 h (p = 0.009), 2 h (p < 0.001), 4 h (p < 0.001), 6 h (p < 0.001), and 12 h (p = 0.02). Additional analgesic requirement during the first 24 h was higher in Group C. Surgeon and patient satisfaction scores significantly improved in Group E. No hemodynamic instability or motor weakness was observed.

Conclusion: Lumbar ESPB with 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine significantly prolongs postoperative analgesia and reduces pain scores and analgesic consumption in patients undergoing THA under spinal anesthesia. Based on these findings, lumbar ESPB may provide effective and safe adjunctive analgesia in this patient population.

竖脊肌平面阻滞用于全髋关节置换术术后镇痛:一项随机对照试验。
背景:本研究旨在评估竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)在脊柱麻醉下全髋关节置换术(THA)患者术后镇痛的效果。患者和方法:在这项随机对照试验中,在2023年1月至2023年12月期间,共有30名患者(美国麻醉医师协会I-III级,20至65岁)在脊髓麻醉下接受了选择性单侧THA。患者被随机分为E组(n = 15)和C组(n = 15), E组接受超声引导下腰ESPB, 40 mL 0.25%布比卡因加10µg芬太尼(2.5 mL 0.5%高压布比卡因加10µg芬太尼)。C组只接受脊髓麻醉。主要结果包括镇痛持续时间和6小时时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。次要结果包括0、0.5、2、4、12、24小时的VAS评分和前24小时的总额外镇痛需求。结果:纳入研究的30例患者中,男性22例,女性8例,平均年龄36.86±13.24岁(范围18至65岁)。E组镇痛时间明显长于对照组(10.76±1.96 h∶4.18±1.36 h; p < 0.01)。E组VAS评分在0.5 h (p = 0.009)、2 h (p < 0.001)、4 h (p < 0.001)、6 h (p < 0.001)和12 h (p = 0.02)时较低。在前24小时内,c组的额外镇痛需求较高。e组的外科医生和患者满意度评分显著提高。结论:40 mL 0.25%布比卡因腰ESPB可显著延长脊柱麻醉下THA患者术后镇痛时间,降低疼痛评分和镇痛消耗。基于这些发现,腰椎ESPB可能为这类患者提供有效和安全的辅助镇痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书