Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using a Composite Graft Plug: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes From a Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 1.3
Arwa Badahdah, Waddah M Alkhouly, Hanadi M Khalifa, Jana Ahmed Alwaznah, Abdulaziz Talal Maleh, Dalia E Meisha, Zuhair S Natto
{"title":"Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using a Composite Graft Plug: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes From a Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Arwa Badahdah, Waddah M Alkhouly, Hanadi M Khalifa, Jana Ahmed Alwaznah, Abdulaziz Talal Maleh, Dalia E Meisha, Zuhair S Natto","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various grafting materials have been used for alveolar ridge preservation with varying degrees of success in maintaining ridge dimensions. This study compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a composite graft plug containing bioactive, resorbable calcium apatite crystals embedded in a collagen matrix with those of a corticocancellous allograft. This randomized clinical trial included 24 participants requiring single-rooted tooth extractions. The participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: composite plug or allograft. Clinical measurements of soft tissue thickness were obtained at baseline and 4 months postextraction using a stent with reference points at 4, 7, and 10 mm apical to the gingival margin of the tooth to be extracted. Furthermore, radiographic assessments were conducted using cone-beam computerized tomography at the same reference points. The results revealed significant increases in soft tissue thickness in both groups with the composite plug group showing a greater increase. Radiographic analysis indicated greater reductions in bone width in the composite plug group across all horizontal measurement levels than in the allograft group. The differences in alveolar ridge width reduction between the groups were 1.36, 1.3, and 1 mm at the specified reference points. However, the composite plug performed better than the allograft in maintaining vertical height. In conclusion, within the limitations of this study, socket preservation using allografts combined with a collagen plug appears to be more effective than composite graft plugs for preserving ridge width.</p>","PeriodicalId":519890,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of oral implantology","volume":"52 4","pages":"276-284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of oral implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various grafting materials have been used for alveolar ridge preservation with varying degrees of success in maintaining ridge dimensions. This study compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a composite graft plug containing bioactive, resorbable calcium apatite crystals embedded in a collagen matrix with those of a corticocancellous allograft. This randomized clinical trial included 24 participants requiring single-rooted tooth extractions. The participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: composite plug or allograft. Clinical measurements of soft tissue thickness were obtained at baseline and 4 months postextraction using a stent with reference points at 4, 7, and 10 mm apical to the gingival margin of the tooth to be extracted. Furthermore, radiographic assessments were conducted using cone-beam computerized tomography at the same reference points. The results revealed significant increases in soft tissue thickness in both groups with the composite plug group showing a greater increase. Radiographic analysis indicated greater reductions in bone width in the composite plug group across all horizontal measurement levels than in the allograft group. The differences in alveolar ridge width reduction between the groups were 1.36, 1.3, and 1 mm at the specified reference points. However, the composite plug performed better than the allograft in maintaining vertical height. In conclusion, within the limitations of this study, socket preservation using allografts combined with a collagen plug appears to be more effective than composite graft plugs for preserving ridge width.

使用复合移植物塞保存牙槽嵴:来自随机临床试验的临床和影像学结果。
各种移植材料已被用于牙槽嵴保存,在维持牙槽嵴尺寸方面取得了不同程度的成功。本研究比较了胶原基质中含有生物活性、可吸收磷灰石钙晶体的复合移植物塞与皮质松质异体移植物的临床和影像学结果。这项随机临床试验包括24名需要拔单根牙的参与者。参与者被随机分配到2组中的1组:复合塞或同种异体移植物。在拔除后基线和4个月,使用参考点为4、7和10 mm的支架获得软组织厚度的临床测量。此外,在相同的参考点使用锥形束计算机断层扫描进行放射学评估。结果显示,两组的软组织厚度均显著增加,其中复合塞组的增加幅度更大。x线分析显示,复合塞组在所有水平测量水平上的骨宽度减小幅度大于同种异体移植物组。在指定的参考点上,组间牙槽嵴宽度缩小的差异分别为1.36、1.3和1 mm。然而,复合桥塞在保持垂直高度方面优于同种异体移植物。综上所述,在本研究的局限性内,使用同种异体移植物结合胶原蛋白塞保存骨槽似乎比复合移植物塞更有效地保存骨脊宽度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书