Implant Treatment for Severe 3-Dimensional Bone Defects in the Area of Missing Adjacent Maxillary Central and Lateral Incisors: Long-Term Follow-Up Using Titanium Mesh and GBR Techniques.

IF 1.3
Hisato Hotta, Yasunori Hotta, Koji Ito, Shinichi Komatsu, Takashi Saito, Yuji Teramoto
{"title":"Implant Treatment for Severe 3-Dimensional Bone Defects in the Area of Missing Adjacent Maxillary Central and Lateral Incisors: Long-Term Follow-Up Using Titanium Mesh and GBR Techniques.","authors":"Hisato Hotta, Yasunori Hotta, Koji Ito, Shinichi Komatsu, Takashi Saito, Yuji Teramoto","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This report presents 2 cases of severe bone defects following the extraction of adjacent maxillary central and lateral incisors. In both cases, the teeth were extracted in the hospital's oral surgery department due to extensive apical periodontitis. Postoperatively, 3-dimensional bone defects were observed, including mesiodistal, labial, and palatal bone loss extending near the nasal floor. In the first case, 2 implants were placed using the guided bone regeneration (GBR) method with titanium mesh. Subsequently, during the second stage surgery, a minor GBR procedure was performed to improve the contour of the implant neck. In the second case, in which the bone defect was even more severe than in the first, a multi-GBR approach was selected. After the initial GBR procedure, insufficient bone formation was observed in the central area of the defect. To address this, the ice cream cone technique was employed to enhance bone regeneration. Subsequently, 2 implants were placed. After implant placement, a vertical concavity was observed between the necks of the 2 implants. To correct this, a second GBR procedure using titanium mesh was performed as in case 1. However, an interimplant black triangle was observed, and a vascularized interpositional periosteal-connective tissue flap was performed to eliminate it. Both cases have been followed for more than 6 years since the placement of the final prostheses with no significant findings in intraoral examinations or cone beam computerized tomography images. Esthetically, no interimplant black triangle was observed. In case 1, a satisfactory outcome was achieved by remaking the prostheses. However, in case 2, which had a more severe bone defect than case 1, the clinical crown length of the prostheses is slightly longer compared with the contralateral side.</p>","PeriodicalId":519890,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of oral implantology","volume":"52 4","pages":"251-260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of oral implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This report presents 2 cases of severe bone defects following the extraction of adjacent maxillary central and lateral incisors. In both cases, the teeth were extracted in the hospital's oral surgery department due to extensive apical periodontitis. Postoperatively, 3-dimensional bone defects were observed, including mesiodistal, labial, and palatal bone loss extending near the nasal floor. In the first case, 2 implants were placed using the guided bone regeneration (GBR) method with titanium mesh. Subsequently, during the second stage surgery, a minor GBR procedure was performed to improve the contour of the implant neck. In the second case, in which the bone defect was even more severe than in the first, a multi-GBR approach was selected. After the initial GBR procedure, insufficient bone formation was observed in the central area of the defect. To address this, the ice cream cone technique was employed to enhance bone regeneration. Subsequently, 2 implants were placed. After implant placement, a vertical concavity was observed between the necks of the 2 implants. To correct this, a second GBR procedure using titanium mesh was performed as in case 1. However, an interimplant black triangle was observed, and a vascularized interpositional periosteal-connective tissue flap was performed to eliminate it. Both cases have been followed for more than 6 years since the placement of the final prostheses with no significant findings in intraoral examinations or cone beam computerized tomography images. Esthetically, no interimplant black triangle was observed. In case 1, a satisfactory outcome was achieved by remaking the prostheses. However, in case 2, which had a more severe bone defect than case 1, the clinical crown length of the prostheses is slightly longer compared with the contralateral side.

钛网和GBR技术治疗上颌邻中、侧切牙缺失区严重三维骨缺损的长期随访
本文报告2例拔除邻近上颌中、侧切牙后出现严重骨缺损的病例。在这两个病例中,由于广泛的根尖牙周炎,在医院的口腔外科拔掉了牙齿。术后观察到三维骨缺损,包括中远端、唇和腭骨丢失,延伸到鼻底附近。在第一例病例中,采用钛网引导骨再生(GBR)方法放置2个种植体。随后,在第二阶段手术中,进行了一个小的GBR手术以改善种植体颈部的轮廓。在第二个病例中,骨缺损比第一个病例更严重,选择了多gbr入路。在初始GBR手术后,在缺损的中心区域观察到骨形成不足。为了解决这个问题,冰淇淋锥技术被用来促进骨再生。随后,放置2个植入物。种植体放置后,观察到两个种植体颈部之间垂直凹陷。为了纠正这一点,使用钛网进行第二次GBR手术,与病例1一样。然而,观察到种植体间黑色三角形,并进行带血管的间位骨膜结缔组织皮瓣消除它。自植入假体以来,这两例患者随访超过6年,口腔内检查或锥形束计算机断层扫描图像均未发现显著结果。美观上未见种植体间黑色三角。在病例1中,通过重建假体获得了满意的结果。然而,病例2的骨缺损比病例1严重,临床假体冠长度比对侧略长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书