Integrating new approach methodologies and artificial intelligence to advance central nervous system toxicity prediction: lessons from preclinical and clinical case studies.

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Mamta Behl, Fiona S Daly, Helena T Hogberg, Brian R Berridge, Jaime D'Agostino, James Eric McDuffie, Hyesun H Oh, Satjit Brar, Simon Authier
{"title":"Integrating new approach methodologies and artificial intelligence to advance central nervous system toxicity prediction: lessons from preclinical and clinical case studies.","authors":"Mamta Behl, Fiona S Daly, Helena T Hogberg, Brian R Berridge, Jaime D'Agostino, James Eric McDuffie, Hyesun H Oh, Satjit Brar, Simon Authier","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/kfag100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central nervous system (CNS) toxicities remain a major cause of drug attrition and represent a persistent challenge in predicting neurological risk during drug development. Limitations in the predictive resolution and translational relevance of conventional nonclinical paradigms contribute to uncertainty in identifying and interpreting neurotoxicity signals. This manuscript examines key challenges in CNS safety assessment and highlights emerging strategies to improve early detection and prediction of neurological risk. Through a series of case studies, we demonstrate practical approaches for interpreting CNS safety signals and integrating emerging methodologies into nonclinical safety assessment. Examples include sensory and seizure-related endpoints in nonclinical studies and the use of electroencephalography (EEG) to improve detection and characterization of seizure liability. We also highlight the expanding role of advanced sensor technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) in enabling continuous, noninvasive monitoring of animal behavior. In addition, an Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA) case study demonstrates how systematic integration of mechanistic data, traditional toxicology findings, and exposure modeling can support regulatory decision-making while aligning with the 3Rs principles (replace, reduce, refine animal testing). Finally, we present regulatory CNS case studies in drug development. Collectively, these approaches enable quantitative assessment of neurological function across circadian cycles, reduce reliance on episodic observer-dependent measurements, and illustrate how integrating refined in vivo methods with New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) and digital technologies can improve prediction of neurological risk and strengthen translation from nonclinical findings to human outcomes in CNS drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":23178,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfag100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) toxicities remain a major cause of drug attrition and represent a persistent challenge in predicting neurological risk during drug development. Limitations in the predictive resolution and translational relevance of conventional nonclinical paradigms contribute to uncertainty in identifying and interpreting neurotoxicity signals. This manuscript examines key challenges in CNS safety assessment and highlights emerging strategies to improve early detection and prediction of neurological risk. Through a series of case studies, we demonstrate practical approaches for interpreting CNS safety signals and integrating emerging methodologies into nonclinical safety assessment. Examples include sensory and seizure-related endpoints in nonclinical studies and the use of electroencephalography (EEG) to improve detection and characterization of seizure liability. We also highlight the expanding role of advanced sensor technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) in enabling continuous, noninvasive monitoring of animal behavior. In addition, an Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA) case study demonstrates how systematic integration of mechanistic data, traditional toxicology findings, and exposure modeling can support regulatory decision-making while aligning with the 3Rs principles (replace, reduce, refine animal testing). Finally, we present regulatory CNS case studies in drug development. Collectively, these approaches enable quantitative assessment of neurological function across circadian cycles, reduce reliance on episodic observer-dependent measurements, and illustrate how integrating refined in vivo methods with New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) and digital technologies can improve prediction of neurological risk and strengthen translation from nonclinical findings to human outcomes in CNS drug development.

整合新方法和人工智能来推进中枢神经系统毒性预测:来自临床前和临床病例研究的经验教训。
中枢神经系统(CNS)毒性仍然是药物损耗的主要原因,也是药物开发过程中预测神经系统风险的一个持续挑战。传统非临床范式在预测分辨率和翻译相关性方面的局限性导致了识别和解释神经毒性信号的不确定性。本文探讨了中枢神经系统安全性评估中的关键挑战,并强调了改善早期发现和预测神经系统风险的新兴策略。通过一系列的案例研究,我们展示了解释中枢神经系统安全信号的实用方法,并将新兴方法整合到非临床安全性评估中。例子包括非临床研究中的感觉和癫痫相关终点,以及使用脑电图(EEG)来改进癫痫发作倾向的检测和表征。我们还强调了先进传感器技术和人工智能(AI)在实现对动物行为的连续、非侵入性监测方面的不断扩大的作用。此外,一项测试和评估综合方法(IATA)案例研究表明,在符合3Rs原则(替代、减少、改进动物试验)的同时,机制数据、传统毒理学发现和暴露建模的系统整合如何支持监管决策。最后,我们介绍了药物开发中监管中枢神经系统的案例研究。总的来说,这些方法能够跨昼夜周期对神经功能进行定量评估,减少对偶偶性观察者依赖性测量的依赖,并说明如何将精炼的体内方法与新方法方法(NAMs)和数字技术相结合,可以改善神经风险的预测,并加强从非临床发现到中枢神经系统药物开发中人类结果的转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxicological Sciences
Toxicological Sciences 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
7.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Toxicological Sciences, the official journal of the Society of Toxicology, is to publish a broad spectrum of impactful research in the field of toxicology. The primary focus of Toxicological Sciences is on original research articles. The journal also provides expert insight via contemporary and systematic reviews, as well as forum articles and editorial content that addresses important topics in the field. The scope of Toxicological Sciences is focused on a broad spectrum of impactful toxicological research that will advance the multidisciplinary field of toxicology ranging from basic research to model development and application, and decision making. Submissions will include diverse technologies and approaches including, but not limited to: bioinformatics and computational biology, biochemistry, exposure science, histopathology, mass spectrometry, molecular biology, population-based sciences, tissue and cell-based systems, and whole-animal studies. Integrative approaches that combine realistic exposure scenarios with impactful analyses that move the field forward are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书