Knowledge and Attitudes on Germline Pharmacogenomic Testing Among Clinical Oncologists.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-04 DOI:10.1200/PO-26-00353
Mattie Monroe, Hetanshi Naik, James M Ford, Michelle Whirl-Carrillo, Teri E Klein, Daniel L Hertz, Stuart A Scott
{"title":"Knowledge and Attitudes on Germline Pharmacogenomic Testing Among Clinical Oncologists.","authors":"Mattie Monroe, Hetanshi Naik, James M Ford, Michelle Whirl-Carrillo, Teri E Klein, Daniel L Hertz, Stuart A Scott","doi":"10.1200/PO-26-00353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite increasing evidence supporting the validity and utility of pharmacogenomic (PGx)-guided prescribing, clinical PGx testing in oncology remains limited. However, expanding professional guidelines and recommendations have accelerated PGx implementation efforts in the United States. Given the availability of actionable PGx guidelines for several medications commonly prescribed to patients with cancer, this study evaluated US oncologists' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers regarding PGx-guided medication management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey focused on oncology-relevant medications with actionable PGx guidelines, including fluoropyrimidines, thiopurines, irinotecan, and opiates/antidepressants, was distributed to clinical oncologists in the United States from December 2023 to August 2024 through ASCO Research Survey Pool, the Association of Northern California Oncologists, and regional ASCO-affiliated groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 providers completed the survey, most through ASCO (n = 125). Opiates and antidepressants were the most frequently prescribed medications in the previous 6 months (92%), followed by fluoropyrimidines (75%). Nearly all respondents (93%) had heard of PGx, although most were only moderately familiar (57%), and PGx awareness for chemotherapies (92%) was much greater than opiates/antidepressants (47%). Reported barriers to PGx testing for chemotherapy management included uncertain utility, concerns for treatment delay, and unclear National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations, and barriers for opiate/antidepressant management included uncertain utility, lack of awareness, and uncertainty regarding test ordering and result interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings provide valuable insights into the perspectives of oncologists on implementing PGx testing; however, awareness and utilization were higher than previously reported. Importantly, the identified implementation barriers for oncology are both actionable and timely, particularly given the evolving updates to drug labels and professional guidelines supporting PGx testing for medications relevant to patients with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"10 8","pages":"e2600353"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-26-00353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite increasing evidence supporting the validity and utility of pharmacogenomic (PGx)-guided prescribing, clinical PGx testing in oncology remains limited. However, expanding professional guidelines and recommendations have accelerated PGx implementation efforts in the United States. Given the availability of actionable PGx guidelines for several medications commonly prescribed to patients with cancer, this study evaluated US oncologists' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers regarding PGx-guided medication management.

Methods: A survey focused on oncology-relevant medications with actionable PGx guidelines, including fluoropyrimidines, thiopurines, irinotecan, and opiates/antidepressants, was distributed to clinical oncologists in the United States from December 2023 to August 2024 through ASCO Research Survey Pool, the Association of Northern California Oncologists, and regional ASCO-affiliated groups.

Results: A total of 146 providers completed the survey, most through ASCO (n = 125). Opiates and antidepressants were the most frequently prescribed medications in the previous 6 months (92%), followed by fluoropyrimidines (75%). Nearly all respondents (93%) had heard of PGx, although most were only moderately familiar (57%), and PGx awareness for chemotherapies (92%) was much greater than opiates/antidepressants (47%). Reported barriers to PGx testing for chemotherapy management included uncertain utility, concerns for treatment delay, and unclear National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations, and barriers for opiate/antidepressant management included uncertain utility, lack of awareness, and uncertainty regarding test ordering and result interpretation.

Conclusion: These findings provide valuable insights into the perspectives of oncologists on implementing PGx testing; however, awareness and utilization were higher than previously reported. Importantly, the identified implementation barriers for oncology are both actionable and timely, particularly given the evolving updates to drug labels and professional guidelines supporting PGx testing for medications relevant to patients with cancer.

临床肿瘤学家对生殖系药物基因组学检测的认识和态度。
目的:尽管越来越多的证据支持药物基因组学(PGx)指导处方的有效性和实用性,但PGx在肿瘤学中的临床测试仍然有限。然而,不断扩大的专业指南和建议加速了PGx在美国的实施工作。鉴于可操作的PGx指南可用于癌症患者常用的几种药物,本研究评估了美国肿瘤学家对PGx指导药物管理的知识、态度和感知障碍。方法:通过ASCO研究调查池、北加州肿瘤学家协会和区域ASCO附属组织,于2023年12月至2024年8月向美国临床肿瘤学家分发了一项针对具有可操作PGx指南的肿瘤相关药物的调查,包括氟嘧啶、硫嘌呤、伊立替康和阿片类/抗抑郁药。结果:共有146名提供者完成了调查,其中大多数通过ASCO (n = 125)。阿片类药物和抗抑郁药是前6个月最常用的处方药(92%),其次是氟嘧啶(75%)。几乎所有的受访者(93%)都听说过PGx,尽管大多数人只是中度熟悉(57%),并且化疗(92%)的PGx知晓率远远高于阿片类药物/抗抑郁药(47%)。据报道,PGx检测用于化疗管理的障碍包括不确定的效用、对治疗延迟的担忧和不明确的国家综合癌症网络建议;阿片类药物/抗抑郁药管理的障碍包括不确定的效用、缺乏意识、测试顺序和结果解释的不确定性。结论:这些发现为肿瘤学家实施PGx检测提供了有价值的见解;然而,认识和利用比以前报道的要高。重要的是,已确定的肿瘤学实施障碍既可操作又及时,特别是考虑到药物标签和专业指南的不断更新,支持对癌症患者相关药物进行PGx检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书