Diagnostic strategies, test accuracy, and misdiagnosis of POTS: a narrative review of diagnostic criteria, tests, and diagnostic delay.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maurice Tiotsop, Douni Roger, Renguh Sama, Eesha Ande, Joshua Salabei
{"title":"Diagnostic strategies, test accuracy, and misdiagnosis of POTS: a narrative review of diagnostic criteria, tests, and diagnostic delay.","authors":"Maurice Tiotsop, Douni Roger, Renguh Sama, Eesha Ande, Joshua Salabei","doi":"10.1007/s10286-026-01233-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome is defined by a sustained heart rate increment upon upright posture without orthostatic hypotension. Despite established criteria, the condition remains frequently underdiagnosed. This narrative review evaluates diagnostic strategies, test accuracy, diagnostic delay, and misdiagnosis patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following prospective registration in PROSPERO (CRD 1248964), 7 databases were searched without date restriction. Eligible studies enrolled individuals aged 12 years or older undergoing evaluation for postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and reported diagnostic accuracy, criteria performance, or delay and misdiagnosis data. Dual-reviewer screening and standardized data extraction were performed. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2 and ROBINS-I. Narrative synthesis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 26 studies met inclusion criteria, enrolling more than 30,000 participants across multiple countries. Diagnostic criteria varied in heart rate thresholds, tilt angle, and test duration. Abbreviated 2-min tilt testing missed 55% of confirmed cases (95% confidence interval 48-63%). Active standing tests achieved areas under the curve of 0.855-0.925 with time-of-day-standardized thresholds. Tachycardia mimicking the syndrome occurred in 26-44% of vasovagal syncope patients during tilt. Two large surveys (n = 13,754) documented a median diagnostic delay of 24 months; approximately 75-76% reported prior misdiagnosis, most frequently attributed to psychological or psychiatric conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome diagnosis is compromised by protocol heterogeneity, abbreviated testing, physiological mimicry, and a pattern of psychiatric misattribution. Standardization of tilt and standing test protocols, clinician education, and structured diagnostic pathways are warranted.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO Registration: CRD1248964.</p>","PeriodicalId":10168,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Autonomic Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Autonomic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-026-01233-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome is defined by a sustained heart rate increment upon upright posture without orthostatic hypotension. Despite established criteria, the condition remains frequently underdiagnosed. This narrative review evaluates diagnostic strategies, test accuracy, diagnostic delay, and misdiagnosis patterns.

Methods: Following prospective registration in PROSPERO (CRD 1248964), 7 databases were searched without date restriction. Eligible studies enrolled individuals aged 12 years or older undergoing evaluation for postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and reported diagnostic accuracy, criteria performance, or delay and misdiagnosis data. Dual-reviewer screening and standardized data extraction were performed. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2 and ROBINS-I. Narrative synthesis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

Results: In total, 26 studies met inclusion criteria, enrolling more than 30,000 participants across multiple countries. Diagnostic criteria varied in heart rate thresholds, tilt angle, and test duration. Abbreviated 2-min tilt testing missed 55% of confirmed cases (95% confidence interval 48-63%). Active standing tests achieved areas under the curve of 0.855-0.925 with time-of-day-standardized thresholds. Tachycardia mimicking the syndrome occurred in 26-44% of vasovagal syncope patients during tilt. Two large surveys (n = 13,754) documented a median diagnostic delay of 24 months; approximately 75-76% reported prior misdiagnosis, most frequently attributed to psychological or psychiatric conditions.

Conclusions: Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome diagnosis is compromised by protocol heterogeneity, abbreviated testing, physiological mimicry, and a pattern of psychiatric misattribution. Standardization of tilt and standing test protocols, clinician education, and structured diagnostic pathways are warranted.

Trial registration: PROSPERO Registration: CRD1248964.

诊断策略、测试准确性和误诊POTS:诊断标准、测试和诊断延迟的叙述性回顾。
目的:体位性站立性心动过速综合征的定义是在直立姿势时持续的心率增加而没有直立性低血压。尽管有既定的标准,但这种疾病仍然经常被误诊。这篇叙述性综述评估了诊断策略、测试准确性、诊断延迟和误诊模式。方法:在PROSPERO (CRD 1248964)前瞻性注册后,在没有日期限制的情况下检索7个数据库。符合条件的研究纳入了12岁或以上的个体,他们正在接受体位性心动过速综合征的评估,并报告了诊断的准确性、标准表现、延迟和误诊数据。进行双审稿人筛选和标准化数据提取。采用QUADAS-2和ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险。叙事综合遵循PRISMA 2020指南。结果:总共有26项研究符合纳入标准,在多个国家招募了30,000多名参与者。诊断标准在心率阈值、倾斜角度和测试时间上有所不同。缩短的2分钟倾斜度检测漏诊55%的确诊病例(95%置信区间48-63%)。主动站立试验在时间标准化阈值曲线下的面积为0.855-0.925。26-44%的血管迷走神经性晕厥患者在倾斜时发生类似综合征的心动过速。两项大型调查(n = 13,754)记录了中位诊断延迟24个月;大约75-76%的人报告了先前的误诊,最常见的原因是心理或精神疾病。结论:体位性立位性心动过速综合征的诊断受到方案异质性、简化测试、生理模仿和精神病学错误归因模式的影响。倾斜和站立测试方案的标准化,临床医生教育和结构化的诊断途径是必要的。试验注册号:PROSPERO注册号:CRD1248964。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Autonomic Research
Clinical Autonomic Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Autonomic Research aims to draw together and disseminate research work from various disciplines and specialties dealing with clinical problems resulting from autonomic dysfunction. Areas to be covered include: cardiovascular system, neurology, diabetes, endocrinology, urology, pain disorders, ophthalmology, gastroenterology, toxicology and clinical pharmacology, skin infectious diseases, renal disease. This journal is an essential source of new information for everyone working in areas involving the autonomic nervous system. A major feature of Clinical Autonomic Research is its speed of publication coupled with the highest refereeing standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书