Bethany Roehm, Yash Vaggar, Justin L Grodin, Robert D Toto
{"title":"Urinary Biomarkers for the Risk Assessment and Management of Heart Failure: Pearls and Pitfalls.","authors":"Bethany Roehm, Yash Vaggar, Justin L Grodin, Robert D Toto","doi":"10.1007/s11897-026-00774-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>We review potential applications and pitfalls of urinary biomarkers in people with heart failure (HF).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Albuminuria may indicate kidney damage and guide prioritization of medications in HF. Urine sodium is useful in guiding diuretic management. Several experimental urine biomarkers have been evaluated, with the most robust data available for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, kidney injury marker 1, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 in conjunction with tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2, angiotensinogen, and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase. None provide diagnostic superiority over serum creatinine in evaluating risk of kidney injury. Some may have utility in identifying those at risk for adverse clinical outcomes. While urine albumin and sodium have prognostic and diagnostic utility in HF, the current role for other urine biomarkers is less clear, particularly in predicting worsening kidney function. Some of these biomarkers may provide mechanistic insights into kidney damage in HF.</p>","PeriodicalId":10830,"journal":{"name":"Current Heart Failure Reports","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13453987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Heart Failure Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-026-00774-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: We review potential applications and pitfalls of urinary biomarkers in people with heart failure (HF).
Recent findings: Albuminuria may indicate kidney damage and guide prioritization of medications in HF. Urine sodium is useful in guiding diuretic management. Several experimental urine biomarkers have been evaluated, with the most robust data available for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, kidney injury marker 1, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 in conjunction with tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2, angiotensinogen, and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase. None provide diagnostic superiority over serum creatinine in evaluating risk of kidney injury. Some may have utility in identifying those at risk for adverse clinical outcomes. While urine albumin and sodium have prognostic and diagnostic utility in HF, the current role for other urine biomarkers is less clear, particularly in predicting worsening kidney function. Some of these biomarkers may provide mechanistic insights into kidney damage in HF.
综述目的:我们回顾尿液生物标志物在心力衰竭(HF)患者中的潜在应用和缺陷。最近的研究发现:蛋白尿可能提示肾脏损害,并指导心衰患者优先选择药物。尿钠在指导利尿剂管理中是有用的。几种实验性尿液生物标志物已经进行了评估,其中最可靠的数据是中性粒细胞明胶酶相关的脂钙蛋白、肾损伤标志物1、胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白7与金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂-2、血管紧张素原和n-乙酰-β- d -氨基葡萄糖酶结合。在评估肾损伤风险方面,没有比血清肌酐更具有诊断优势。一些可能在识别那些有不良临床结果风险的人方面有用。虽然尿白蛋白和尿钠在心衰中具有预后和诊断作用,但目前其他尿液生物标志物的作用尚不清楚,特别是在预测肾功能恶化方面。其中一些生物标志物可能为心衰肾损害提供机制见解。
期刊介绍:
This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of heart failure. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as investigative, pharmacologic, and nonpharmacologic therapies, pathophysiology, and prevention. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.