Effect of faucet-mounted water filters on the fluoride and calcium concentrations of tap water.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2026-08-01
Ahmed S Aljuaid, Armando E Soto-Rojas, Laila Al Dehailan, Fahad S Algahtani, George J Eckert, Frank Lippert
{"title":"Effect of faucet-mounted water filters on the fluoride and calcium concentrations of tap water.","authors":"Ahmed S Aljuaid, Armando E Soto-Rojas, Laila Al Dehailan, Fahad S Algahtani, George J Eckert, Frank Lippert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of faucet-mounted water filters (FMWF) on the fluoride and calcium concentrations in tap water during their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of 15 different brands of FMWF was investigated (PUR, Brita, Waterdrop, Culligan, Engdenton, DuPont, Instapure, iSpring, OEMIRY, IVO, SJ WAVE, WINGSOL, ZeroWater, AIBERLE, MIST). Water samples were collected before the installation and after removal of the filters to determine baseline fluoride and calcium values. After mounting the filters, samples were collected after 1, 5, 10, 30, 50, 75, and 100 liters of water passed through each filter. Fluoride analysis was performed using a fluoride ion-specific electrode (Orion #96-909-00), while calcium analysis was performed using atomic absorption spectrometry. The data were analyzed using one-sample t-tests and one-way ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found significantly lower fluoride and calcium levels (P< 0.05) in water filtered through PUR, Brita, and AIBERLE filters than in unfiltered water, whereas water filtered through Waterdrop, WINGSOL, and MIST filters had higher levels of fluoride and calcium. Overall, the differences between filtered and unfiltered water were minor for fluoride (up to 4% reduction) but more substantial for calcium (up to 25% reduction).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The evaluated faucet-mounted water filters do not affect fluoride concentrations in tap water and thus the effectiveness of community water fluoridation in a clinically significant manner; however, some filters may reduce calcium concentrations significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"39 4","pages":"187-192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of faucet-mounted water filters (FMWF) on the fluoride and calcium concentrations in tap water during their use.

Methods: A convenience sample of 15 different brands of FMWF was investigated (PUR, Brita, Waterdrop, Culligan, Engdenton, DuPont, Instapure, iSpring, OEMIRY, IVO, SJ WAVE, WINGSOL, ZeroWater, AIBERLE, MIST). Water samples were collected before the installation and after removal of the filters to determine baseline fluoride and calcium values. After mounting the filters, samples were collected after 1, 5, 10, 30, 50, 75, and 100 liters of water passed through each filter. Fluoride analysis was performed using a fluoride ion-specific electrode (Orion #96-909-00), while calcium analysis was performed using atomic absorption spectrometry. The data were analyzed using one-sample t-tests and one-way ANOVA.

Results: The study found significantly lower fluoride and calcium levels (P< 0.05) in water filtered through PUR, Brita, and AIBERLE filters than in unfiltered water, whereas water filtered through Waterdrop, WINGSOL, and MIST filters had higher levels of fluoride and calcium. Overall, the differences between filtered and unfiltered water were minor for fluoride (up to 4% reduction) but more substantial for calcium (up to 25% reduction).

Clinical significance: The evaluated faucet-mounted water filters do not affect fluoride concentrations in tap water and thus the effectiveness of community water fluoridation in a clinically significant manner; however, some filters may reduce calcium concentrations significantly.

安装在水龙头上的水过滤器对自来水中氟化物和钙浓度的影响。
目的:评价水龙头式水过滤器(FMWF)在使用过程中对自来水中氟、钙浓度的影响。方法:选取PUR、Brita、Waterdrop、Culligan、Engdenton、DuPont、Instapure、isspring、oemity、IVO、SJ WAVE、WINGSOL、ZeroWater、AIBERLE、MIST等15个不同品牌的FMWF方便取样。在安装过滤器之前和拆除过滤器之后收集水样,以确定氟和钙的基线值。安装过滤器后,在1、5、10、30、50、75和100升的水通过每个过滤器后收集样品。氟离子分析采用氟离子专用电极(Orion #96-909-00),钙分析采用原子吸收光谱法。数据分析采用单样本t检验和单因素方差分析。结果:研究发现,通过PUR、Brita和AIBERLE过滤器过滤的水的氟化物和钙含量显著低于未过滤的水(P< 0.05),而通过Waterdrop、WINGSOL和MIST过滤器过滤的水的氟化物和钙含量较高。总的来说,过滤水和未经过滤的水在氟化物方面的差异很小(最多减少4%),但在钙方面的差异更大(最多减少25%)。临床意义:所评估的安装在水龙头上的水过滤器不影响自来水中的氟化物浓度,因此社区水氟化的有效性在临床上具有重要意义;然而,一些过滤器可能会显著降低钙浓度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书