Congenital heart disease in pregnancy and severe maternal morbidity: a distributed data network study.

Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-04 DOI:10.1002/pmf2.70370
Elizabeth B Sherwin, Benjamin Martin, Xiao Xu, Anna Booman, Alyssa Howren, Kimberlee McKay, Sadaf Kazi, Sean O'Reilly, Katie S Kolla, Khyzer Aziz, Katherine Bianco, Stephanie A Leonard
{"title":"Congenital heart disease in pregnancy and severe maternal morbidity: a distributed data network study.","authors":"Elizabeth B Sherwin, Benjamin Martin, Xiao Xu, Anna Booman, Alyssa Howren, Kimberlee McKay, Sadaf Kazi, Sean O'Reilly, Katie S Kolla, Khyzer Aziz, Katherine Bianco, Stephanie A Leonard","doi":"10.1002/pmf2.70370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pregnant people with congenital heart disease (CHD) are a growing patient population in obstetrics, yet evidence on the risk for severe maternal morbidity (SMM) has largely been limited to studies that lack specificity for CHD. We conducted this study to demonstrate the utility of distributed data networks for obstetric research and to characterize pregnant patients with CHD and their risk of SMM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included female patients aged 12-55 years who delivered between 2015 and 2026 at three U.S. academic healthcare organizations. We used a distributed data network study design by developing analytical code, executing the code locally at each organization using its electronic health record (EHR) data in a common data model (CDM), then aggregating the results. This analytical approach is rigorous, reproducible, and protects patient confidentiality by not sharing patient-level data. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM was used by each organization, and we used OMOP standard concepts to identify CHD and SMM. We categorized outcomes as SMM, non-transfusion SMM, and cardiac SMM based on the CDC SMM index. We analyzed the incidence of the outcomes and estimated risk ratios (RRs) and Wald 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using contingency tables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of CHD in pregnancy was 2.20% among 166,033 deliveries across three healthcare organizations. 19.30% of people with CHD had an acquired heart condition, compared to 2.14% of people without CHD. SMM occurred in 9.43% of deliveries to people with CHD compared to 4.53% among people without CHD (RR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.88, 2.31), and non-transfusion SMM occurred in 6.72% vs 2.55% of deliveries (RR: 2.63; 95% CI: 2.33, 2.98), respectively. Cardiac SMM represented 51.84% of non-transfusion SMM among people with CHD compared to 16.18% among people without CHD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our distributed data network study using EHR data from three geographically diverse U.S. healthcare organizations found that 1 in 15 people with CHD had non-transfusion SMM compared with 1 in 39 people without CHD. This study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of distributed data networks for obstetric research and provides novel evidence on maternal outcomes for pregnant patients with CHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":520540,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"2 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13449514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnant people with congenital heart disease (CHD) are a growing patient population in obstetrics, yet evidence on the risk for severe maternal morbidity (SMM) has largely been limited to studies that lack specificity for CHD. We conducted this study to demonstrate the utility of distributed data networks for obstetric research and to characterize pregnant patients with CHD and their risk of SMM.

Methods: The study included female patients aged 12-55 years who delivered between 2015 and 2026 at three U.S. academic healthcare organizations. We used a distributed data network study design by developing analytical code, executing the code locally at each organization using its electronic health record (EHR) data in a common data model (CDM), then aggregating the results. This analytical approach is rigorous, reproducible, and protects patient confidentiality by not sharing patient-level data. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM was used by each organization, and we used OMOP standard concepts to identify CHD and SMM. We categorized outcomes as SMM, non-transfusion SMM, and cardiac SMM based on the CDC SMM index. We analyzed the incidence of the outcomes and estimated risk ratios (RRs) and Wald 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using contingency tables.

Results: The prevalence of CHD in pregnancy was 2.20% among 166,033 deliveries across three healthcare organizations. 19.30% of people with CHD had an acquired heart condition, compared to 2.14% of people without CHD. SMM occurred in 9.43% of deliveries to people with CHD compared to 4.53% among people without CHD (RR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.88, 2.31), and non-transfusion SMM occurred in 6.72% vs 2.55% of deliveries (RR: 2.63; 95% CI: 2.33, 2.98), respectively. Cardiac SMM represented 51.84% of non-transfusion SMM among people with CHD compared to 16.18% among people without CHD.

Conclusions: Our distributed data network study using EHR data from three geographically diverse U.S. healthcare organizations found that 1 in 15 people with CHD had non-transfusion SMM compared with 1 in 39 people without CHD. This study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of distributed data networks for obstetric research and provides novel evidence on maternal outcomes for pregnant patients with CHD.

妊娠期先天性心脏病与重度孕产妇发病率:一项分布式数据网络研究。
患有先天性心脏病(CHD)的孕妇是一个越来越多的产科患者群体,然而关于严重产妇发病率(SMM)风险的证据在很大程度上仅限于缺乏冠心病特异性的研究。我们进行了这项研究,以证明分布式数据网络在产科研究中的效用,并表征冠心病孕妇及其SMM风险。方法:该研究纳入了2015年至2026年间在美国三家学术医疗机构分娩的年龄在12-55岁的女性患者。我们使用分布式数据网络研究设计,开发分析代码,在公共数据模型(CDM)中使用每个组织的电子健康记录(EHR)数据在本地执行代码,然后汇总结果。这种分析方法是严格的、可重复的,并且通过不共享患者级别的数据来保护患者的机密性。每个组织都使用观察性医疗结果伙伴关系(OMOP) CDM,我们使用OMOP标准概念来识别冠心病和SMM。我们根据CDC SMM指数将结果分为SMM、非输血SMM和心脏SMM。我们分析了结果的发生率,并使用列联表估计了风险比(rr)和Wald 95%置信区间(ci)。结果:在三个医疗机构的166033例分娩中,妊娠期冠心病的患病率为2.20%。19.30%的冠心病患者患有后发性心脏病,而非冠心病患者的这一比例为2.14%。冠心病患者分娩中SMM发生率为9.43%,非冠心病患者为4.53% (RR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.88, 2.31),非输血分娩中SMM发生率为6.72%,非输血分娩发生率为2.55% (RR: 2.63; 95% CI: 2.33, 2.98)。在冠心病患者中,心脏SMM占非输血SMM的51.84%,而在非冠心病患者中,这一比例为16.18%。结论:我们的分布式数据网络研究使用了来自三个地理位置不同的美国医疗机构的电子病历数据,发现每15名冠心病患者中有1人有非输血SMM,而非冠心病患者中有39人有1人有非输血SMM。本研究证明了分布式数据网络在产科研究中的可行性和实用性,并为妊娠冠心病患者的产妇结局提供了新的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书