Modelling the regulatory toxicology system to promote the effective use of new approach methodologies: a system thinking approach.

NAM journal Pub Date : 2026-07-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.namjnl.2026.100120
Angela Bearth, Birgit Kopainsky, Lowenna B Jones, Gunn E Vist, Trine Husøy, Camilla Svendsen, Paul Whaley, Sebastian Hoffmann, Heather M R Ames, Denise Bloch, Aleksandra Čavoški, Holly G Davies, Arianna Giusti, Thomas Hartung, Seok Kwon, Olivia J Osborne, Christophe Rousselle, Jennifer B Sass, Ulla Simanainen, Kristina A Thayer, Daniele Wikoff, Gro H Mathisen
{"title":"Modelling the regulatory toxicology system to promote the effective use of new approach methodologies: a system thinking approach.","authors":"Angela Bearth, Birgit Kopainsky, Lowenna B Jones, Gunn E Vist, Trine Husøy, Camilla Svendsen, Paul Whaley, Sebastian Hoffmann, Heather M R Ames, Denise Bloch, Aleksandra Čavoški, Holly G Davies, Arianna Giusti, Thomas Hartung, Seok Kwon, Olivia J Osborne, Christophe Rousselle, Jennifer B Sass, Ulla Simanainen, Kristina A Thayer, Daniele Wikoff, Gro H Mathisen","doi":"10.1016/j.namjnl.2026.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The term \"New Approach Methodologies\" (NAMs) comprises a plethora of approaches with the potential for testing the safety, efficacy, and biological effects of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and other substances without relying exclusively on traditional animal testing methodologies. While it is debateable whether \"new\" is the appropriate terminology - some NAMs have been around for several decades, while others have been developed recently - many scholars have observed that the effective uptake of NAMs in regulatory toxicology remains a challenge. The interdisciplinary CHANGE project applies a systems thinking approach to this challenge by modelling the behaviour of the regulatory toxicology system shaped by system-level factors and their interconnections. This article reports findings from two three-day workshops held in Oslo in summer 2024 (Workshop 1 \"Explore\") and 2025 (Workshop 2 \"Reflect\") with experienced practitioners from regulatory agencies, industry, civil society organisations and academia. Through structured collaborative activities, including small- and large-group discussions, modelling exercises and reflection activities, considerable qualitative data was gathered. Most sessions were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using a multi-step thematic analysis explicitly guided by systems thinking principles, enabling the identification of systemic structures and feedback mechanisms and their visualization in the form of a systems model. Insights from Workshop 1 \"Explore\" were revisited and stress-tested in Workshop 2 \"Reflect\", deepening the robustness of the resulting systems model. This systems model shows structural, economic, social, cultural and technical factors that are interlinked through reinforcing and balancing feedback loops that promote or inhibit the effective use of NAMs. The systems model shows potential leverage points for system change, for instance enhancing the stability and reliability of the supply chain or ensuring that actors in the regulatory toxicology system have both educational and institutional support to effectively change established practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":520522,"journal":{"name":"NAM journal","volume":"2 ","pages":"100120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13450631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAM journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.namjnl.2026.100120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The term "New Approach Methodologies" (NAMs) comprises a plethora of approaches with the potential for testing the safety, efficacy, and biological effects of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and other substances without relying exclusively on traditional animal testing methodologies. While it is debateable whether "new" is the appropriate terminology - some NAMs have been around for several decades, while others have been developed recently - many scholars have observed that the effective uptake of NAMs in regulatory toxicology remains a challenge. The interdisciplinary CHANGE project applies a systems thinking approach to this challenge by modelling the behaviour of the regulatory toxicology system shaped by system-level factors and their interconnections. This article reports findings from two three-day workshops held in Oslo in summer 2024 (Workshop 1 "Explore") and 2025 (Workshop 2 "Reflect") with experienced practitioners from regulatory agencies, industry, civil society organisations and academia. Through structured collaborative activities, including small- and large-group discussions, modelling exercises and reflection activities, considerable qualitative data was gathered. Most sessions were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using a multi-step thematic analysis explicitly guided by systems thinking principles, enabling the identification of systemic structures and feedback mechanisms and their visualization in the form of a systems model. Insights from Workshop 1 "Explore" were revisited and stress-tested in Workshop 2 "Reflect", deepening the robustness of the resulting systems model. This systems model shows structural, economic, social, cultural and technical factors that are interlinked through reinforcing and balancing feedback loops that promote or inhibit the effective use of NAMs. The systems model shows potential leverage points for system change, for instance enhancing the stability and reliability of the supply chain or ensuring that actors in the regulatory toxicology system have both educational and institutional support to effectively change established practices.

模拟监管毒理学系统,以促进新方法方法的有效使用:系统思维方法。
术语“新方法方法”(NAMs)包含了大量的方法,这些方法具有测试化学品、药品和其他物质的安全性、有效性和生物效应的潜力,而无需完全依赖传统的动物试验方法。虽然“新”是否是合适的术语存在争议——一些NAMs已经存在了几十年,而另一些NAMs是最近才开发出来的——许多学者已经观察到,在监管毒理学中有效地吸收NAMs仍然是一个挑战。跨学科的CHANGE项目通过模拟由系统级因素及其相互联系形成的监管毒理学系统的行为,应用系统思维方法来应对这一挑战。本文报告了2024年夏季在奥斯陆举行的两次为期三天的研讨会(研讨会1“探索”)和2025年(研讨会2“反思”)的研究结果,这些研讨会有来自监管机构、工业、民间社会组织和学术界的经验丰富的从业者。通过有组织的协作活动,包括小型和大型小组讨论、建模练习和反思活动,收集了大量的定性数据。大多数会议都被记录、转录和分析,使用多步骤的主题分析,在系统思维原则的明确指导下,能够识别系统结构和反馈机制,并以系统模型的形式将其可视化。工作坊1“探索”的见解在工作坊2“反映”中被重新审视并进行了压力测试,加深了结果系统模型的稳健性。该系统模型显示了结构、经济、社会、文化和技术因素,这些因素通过加强和平衡促进或抑制NAMs有效利用的反馈循环而相互联系。系统模型显示了系统变化的潜在杠杆点,例如,增强供应链的稳定性和可靠性,或确保监管毒理学系统中的参与者获得教育和制度支持,以有效地改变既定做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书