{"title":"Delivery outcomes associated with resolved first-trimester low placentation.","authors":"Rachel Feiner, Rachel Wiley, Leah Lamale-Smith, E Nicole Teal, Minhazur Sarker","doi":"10.1002/pmf2.70368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The majority of low placentation identified on first-trimester transabdominal ultrasound resolves; however, whether this resolution is associated with adverse outcome remains poorly understood. This investigation aimed to determine whether patients with resolved first-trimester low placentation had different delivery outcomes compared to patients who never had low placentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies with low placentation, defined as low-lying placenta or placenta covering the internal os, on first-trimester transabdominal ultrasound between 12+0 weeks and 13+6 weeks, delivering at a single tertiary care center from January to December 2022. We compared outcomes stratified by first-trimester low placentation that resolved by the second trimester, or those without low placentation at any point. The primary outcome was quantitative blood loss at delivery by volumetric measurement. Secondary outcomes included postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) defined as blood loss ≥1000 cc, unplanned cesarean delivery, preterm birth, 5-min Apgar < 7, and composite maternal adverse outcomes including the use of atony device, retained products of conception, blood transfusion, peripartum hysterectomy, intensive care unit admission, or death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This cohort included 437 low placentation patients and 491 patients without low placentation. Resolved first-trimester low placentation was associated with a significant increase in quantitative blood loss at delivery (405 ± 369 cc vs. 331 ± 253 cc, <i>p</i> < 0.01) but no difference in incidence of PPH (6.4% vs. 4.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.25). Resolved first-trimester low placentation was also associated with increased tranexamic acid (TXA) administration (11.9% vs. 7.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.03), blood transfusion (1.8% vs. 0.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.04), and unplanned cesarean delivery (15.3% vs. 9.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) without differences in the indications for unplanned cesarean delivery. In our multivariable regression, resolved first-trimester low placentation remained associated with TXA administration (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-2.70) and unplanned cesarean delivery (adjusted OR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.12-2.68). There were no associations with adverse neonatal outcomes or composite maternal outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resolved first-trimester low placentation is not associated with clinically significant adverse outcomes. However, given changes in unplanned cesarean delivery rate, resolved low placentation may indicate altered uterine physiology. Future research would be valuable to better understand the relationship between resolved low placentation and unplanned cesarean deliveries.</p>","PeriodicalId":520540,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"2 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13449248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The majority of low placentation identified on first-trimester transabdominal ultrasound resolves; however, whether this resolution is associated with adverse outcome remains poorly understood. This investigation aimed to determine whether patients with resolved first-trimester low placentation had different delivery outcomes compared to patients who never had low placentation.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies with low placentation, defined as low-lying placenta or placenta covering the internal os, on first-trimester transabdominal ultrasound between 12+0 weeks and 13+6 weeks, delivering at a single tertiary care center from January to December 2022. We compared outcomes stratified by first-trimester low placentation that resolved by the second trimester, or those without low placentation at any point. The primary outcome was quantitative blood loss at delivery by volumetric measurement. Secondary outcomes included postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) defined as blood loss ≥1000 cc, unplanned cesarean delivery, preterm birth, 5-min Apgar < 7, and composite maternal adverse outcomes including the use of atony device, retained products of conception, blood transfusion, peripartum hysterectomy, intensive care unit admission, or death.
Results: This cohort included 437 low placentation patients and 491 patients without low placentation. Resolved first-trimester low placentation was associated with a significant increase in quantitative blood loss at delivery (405 ± 369 cc vs. 331 ± 253 cc, p < 0.01) but no difference in incidence of PPH (6.4% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.25). Resolved first-trimester low placentation was also associated with increased tranexamic acid (TXA) administration (11.9% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.03), blood transfusion (1.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.04), and unplanned cesarean delivery (15.3% vs. 9.2%, p < 0.01) without differences in the indications for unplanned cesarean delivery. In our multivariable regression, resolved first-trimester low placentation remained associated with TXA administration (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-2.70) and unplanned cesarean delivery (adjusted OR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.12-2.68). There were no associations with adverse neonatal outcomes or composite maternal outcome.
Conclusion: Resolved first-trimester low placentation is not associated with clinically significant adverse outcomes. However, given changes in unplanned cesarean delivery rate, resolved low placentation may indicate altered uterine physiology. Future research would be valuable to better understand the relationship between resolved low placentation and unplanned cesarean deliveries.
导读:大多数在妊娠早期经腹部超声检查发现的低胎盘都解决了;然而,这种解决是否与不良后果有关仍然知之甚少。本研究旨在确定解决妊娠早期低胎盘的患者与从未低胎盘的患者相比是否有不同的分娩结果。方法:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,对2022年1月至12月在单一三级保健中心分娩的12+0周至13+6周的孕早期经腹超声检查的低胎盘单胎妊娠,定义为低胎盘或胎盘覆盖内部os。我们比较了妊娠早期低胎盘到妊娠中期消退的结果,或在任何时候都没有低胎盘的结果。主要终点是通过体积测量定量分娩时的失血量。次要结局包括产后出血(PPH)(定义为失血量≥1000cc)、意外剖宫产、早产、5分钟Apgar < 7)和孕产妇综合不良结局(包括使用避孕器、保留妊娠产物、输血、围产期子宫切除术、入住重症监护病房或死亡)。结果:该队列包括437例低胎盘患者和491例无低胎盘患者。解决妊娠早期低胎盘与分娩时定量失血量显著增加相关(405±369 cc对331±253 cc, p < 0.01),但PPH发生率无差异(6.4%对4.7%,p = 0.25)。解决妊娠早期低胎盘也与氨甲环酸(TXA)给药增加(11.9% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.03)、输血(1.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.04)和计划外剖宫产(15.3% vs. 9.2%, p < 0.01)相关,但计划外剖宫产的指征无差异。在我们的多变量回归中,解决的妊娠早期低胎盘仍然与TXA给药(调整优势比[OR], 1.70; 95%可信区间[CI], 1.07-2.70)和非计划剖宫产(调整优势比[OR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.12-2.68)相关。与不良新生儿结局或综合产妇结局没有关联。结论:解决妊娠早期低胎盘与临床显著不良结局无关。然而,考虑到意外剖宫产率的变化,解决低胎盘可能表明子宫生理改变。未来的研究将有助于更好地了解解决低胎盘和计划外剖宫产之间的关系。