The proportion of GBS-positive mothers among the screened population and outcomes of maternal Group B streptococcus colonization at King Saud University Medical City: a retrospective cohort study.

Annals of Saudi medicine Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-06 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2026.268
Nada Alayed, Hessah AlOthman, Ahmad Almalki, Kazi Nur Asfina, Najma Khalil, Ali Somily, Noor Faraj Alzahrani, Futoon Alsaleh, Layan Alhelal, Noyer Alshaibany, Ahmed Sherif Abdel Hamid Abdel Wahab, Mohamed Adel
{"title":"The proportion of GBS-positive mothers among the screened population and outcomes of maternal Group B streptococcus colonization at King Saud University Medical City: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Nada Alayed, Hessah AlOthman, Ahmad Almalki, Kazi Nur Asfina, Najma Khalil, Ali Somily, Noor Faraj Alzahrani, Futoon Alsaleh, Layan Alhelal, Noyer Alshaibany, Ahmed Sherif Abdel Hamid Abdel Wahab, Mohamed Adel","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2026.268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of neonatal morbidity, preventable via intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the proportion of GBS-positive mothers among the screened population, evaluate IAP protocol adherence, and identify clinical risk factors and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Labor and Delivery Suite at King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Riyadh.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Electronic medical records (July 2021-December 2022) were reviewed for pregnant women (≥35 weeks) who were screened or had GBS bacteriuria, along with their neonates. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine risk factors.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Proportion of GBS-positive mothers among the screened population, IAP timing, maternal febrile morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, and culture-positive sepsis.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>Of the 5292 deliveries, 688 unscreened elective cesareans were excluded, leaving 4604 screened women and 180 GBS-positive dyads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of GBS-positive mothers among the screened population was 3.91% (180/4604). Although 67.2% (121/180) of colonized women received IAP, only 15.6% (28/180) received it ≥4 hours before delivery. Maternal febrile morbidity was 0% (0/180). The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission rate was 8.3% (15/180), and culture-positive neonatal sepsis occurred in 1.1% (2/180) of cases. GBS bacteriuria independently predicted adverse neonatal outcomes (aOR 2.35, 95% CI: 1.12-4.92, <i>P</i>=.024), while preterm delivery showed a negative correlation (aOR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.76, <i>P</i>=.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proportion of GBS-positive mothers in the screened population is low (3.91%). While perinatal outcomes were generally excellent regardless of antibiotic timing, GBS bacteriuria was identified as a significant, independent predictor of adverse neonatal outcomes. These findings highlight a biologically plausible risk pathway that warrants validation in larger, multi-center prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":93875,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi medicine","volume":"46 4","pages":"268-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13452894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2026.268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of neonatal morbidity, preventable via intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP).

Objective: To determine the proportion of GBS-positive mothers among the screened population, evaluate IAP protocol adherence, and identify clinical risk factors and outcomes.

Design: Single-center retrospective cohort study.

Settings: Labor and Delivery Suite at King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Riyadh.

Patients and methods: Electronic medical records (July 2021-December 2022) were reviewed for pregnant women (≥35 weeks) who were screened or had GBS bacteriuria, along with their neonates. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine risk factors.

Main outcome measures: Proportion of GBS-positive mothers among the screened population, IAP timing, maternal febrile morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, and culture-positive sepsis.

Sample size: Of the 5292 deliveries, 688 unscreened elective cesareans were excluded, leaving 4604 screened women and 180 GBS-positive dyads.

Results: The proportion of GBS-positive mothers among the screened population was 3.91% (180/4604). Although 67.2% (121/180) of colonized women received IAP, only 15.6% (28/180) received it ≥4 hours before delivery. Maternal febrile morbidity was 0% (0/180). The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission rate was 8.3% (15/180), and culture-positive neonatal sepsis occurred in 1.1% (2/180) of cases. GBS bacteriuria independently predicted adverse neonatal outcomes (aOR 2.35, 95% CI: 1.12-4.92, P=.024), while preterm delivery showed a negative correlation (aOR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.76, P=.012).

Conclusions: The proportion of GBS-positive mothers in the screened population is low (3.91%). While perinatal outcomes were generally excellent regardless of antibiotic timing, GBS bacteriuria was identified as a significant, independent predictor of adverse neonatal outcomes. These findings highlight a biologically plausible risk pathway that warrants validation in larger, multi-center prospective studies.

沙特国王大学医学城筛查人群中gbs阳性母亲的比例和母亲B群链球菌定植的结果:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:B族链球菌(GBS)是新生儿发病的主要原因,可通过产时抗生素预防(IAP)预防。目的:确定筛查人群中gbs阳性母亲的比例,评估IAP方案的依从性,并确定临床危险因素和结局。设计:单中心回顾性队列研究。地点:利雅得沙特国王大学医学城(KSUMC)的产房。患者和方法:对筛查或有GBS细菌的孕妇(≥35周)及其新生儿的电子病历(2021年7月- 2022年12月)进行了回顾。采用多因素logistic回归确定危险因素。主要结局指标:筛查人群中gbs阳性母亲的比例、IAP时间、产妇发热发病率、新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院率和培养阳性败血症。样本量:在5292例分娩中,688例未筛查的选择性剖宫产被排除在外,剩下4604例筛查的妇女和180例gbs阳性的双体。结果:筛查人群中gbs阳性母亲比例为3.91%(180/4604)。尽管67.2%(121/180)的殖民妇女接受了IAP,但只有15.6%(28/180)的妇女在分娩前≥4小时接受了IAP。产妇发热发病率为0%(0/180)。新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院率为8.3%(15/180),培养阳性新生儿脓毒症发生率为1.1%(2/180)。GBS菌血症独立预测新生儿不良结局(aOR 2.35, 95% CI: 1.12-4.92, P= 0.024),而早产呈负相关(aOR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.76, P= 0.012)。结论:筛查人群中gbs阳性母亲的比例较低(3.91%)。尽管围产期结局一般都很好,而不考虑抗生素的时机,但GBS细菌尿被认为是新生儿不良结局的一个重要的、独立的预测因素。这些发现强调了生物学上合理的风险途径,值得在更大的、多中心的前瞻性研究中验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书