Hormonal Contraceptives and Women's Mate-Value-Related Traits and Outcomes.

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Juliana E French, Elizabeth Barron, Emma E Altgelt, Maryanne L Fisher, Andrea L Meltzer
{"title":"Hormonal Contraceptives and Women's Mate-Value-Related Traits and Outcomes.","authors":"Juliana E French, Elizabeth Barron, Emma E Altgelt, Maryanne L Fisher, Andrea L Meltzer","doi":"10.1007/s12110-026-09529-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People's perceptions of their mate value-a compilation of characteristics that are desirable to potential partners-functionally guide their mating behaviors. Hormonal contraceptives alter the hormonal profiles linked to some characteristics underlying women's mate value (e.g., fertility, sociality, potential parenting ability). Thus, relative to naturally cycling women, women using hormonal contraceptives may perceive such characteristics more negatively (due to suppressed fertility) or positively (due to possible bolstered sociality and/or potential parenting ability). The purpose of this research was to test these competing possibilities. Study 1a and 1b utilized samples of single, undergraduate women and newly married women, respectively, to test the association between hormonal contraceptive use and a commonly used proxy for self-perceived mate value-self-perceived mating success. Study1b additionally tested whether the association emerged independently of sexual frequency. Study 2 tested the robustness of the observed association, using a larger sample of single women and a measure assessing perceived characteristics underlying mate value rather than perceived mating success. We then conducted a mini-meta-analysis to estimate the average effect size for all relevant effect sizes available to date. Across studies, women using hormonal contraceptives rated mate-value-relevant traits and outcomes more positively than naturally cycling women. This association is not due to sexual motives or sexual behaviors. The current research adds to a growing literature revealing differences in mating and relationship psychology between women who do versus do not use hormonal contraceptives.</p>","PeriodicalId":47797,"journal":{"name":"Human Nature-An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Nature-An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-026-09529-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People's perceptions of their mate value-a compilation of characteristics that are desirable to potential partners-functionally guide their mating behaviors. Hormonal contraceptives alter the hormonal profiles linked to some characteristics underlying women's mate value (e.g., fertility, sociality, potential parenting ability). Thus, relative to naturally cycling women, women using hormonal contraceptives may perceive such characteristics more negatively (due to suppressed fertility) or positively (due to possible bolstered sociality and/or potential parenting ability). The purpose of this research was to test these competing possibilities. Study 1a and 1b utilized samples of single, undergraduate women and newly married women, respectively, to test the association between hormonal contraceptive use and a commonly used proxy for self-perceived mate value-self-perceived mating success. Study1b additionally tested whether the association emerged independently of sexual frequency. Study 2 tested the robustness of the observed association, using a larger sample of single women and a measure assessing perceived characteristics underlying mate value rather than perceived mating success. We then conducted a mini-meta-analysis to estimate the average effect size for all relevant effect sizes available to date. Across studies, women using hormonal contraceptives rated mate-value-relevant traits and outcomes more positively than naturally cycling women. This association is not due to sexual motives or sexual behaviors. The current research adds to a growing literature revealing differences in mating and relationship psychology between women who do versus do not use hormonal contraceptives.

激素避孕药与女性配偶价值相关的特征和结果。
人们对伴侣价值的认知——潜在伴侣所期望的一系列特征——在功能上指导着他们的交配行为。激素避孕药会改变与女性择偶价值(如生育能力、社交能力、潜在育儿能力)相关的荷尔蒙特征。因此,相对于自然循环的女性,使用激素避孕药的女性可能更消极地看待这些特征(由于生育能力受到抑制)或积极地看待这些特征(由于可能加强社交和/或潜在的养育能力)。这项研究的目的是测试这些相互竞争的可能性。研究1a和1b分别利用单身女性、本科女性和新婚女性的样本来测试激素避孕药的使用与自我感知伴侣价值-自我感知交配成功的常用代理之间的关系。研究1b还测试了这种联系是否独立于性生活频率而出现。研究2测试了观察到的关联的稳健性,使用了更大的单身女性样本,并评估了潜在伴侣价值的感知特征,而不是感知的交配成功。然后,我们进行了一项小型荟萃分析,以估计迄今为止所有相关效应量的平均效应量。在所有研究中,使用激素避孕药的女性比自然避孕的女性更积极地评价与伴侣价值相关的特征和结果。这种联系不是由于性动机或性行为。目前的研究增加了越来越多的文献,揭示了使用激素避孕药和不使用激素避孕药的女性在交配和关系心理上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Human Nature is dedicated to advancing the interdisciplinary investigation of the biological, social, and environmental factors that underlie human behavior. It focuses primarily on the functional unity in which these factors are continuously and mutually interactive. These include the evolutionary, biological, and sociological processes as they interact with human social behavior; the biological and demographic consequences of human history; the cross-cultural, cross-species, and historical perspectives on human behavior; and the relevance of a biosocial perspective to scientific, social, and policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书