Joshua P. Mersky, Colleen E. Janczewski, Jack Pollard, Allison Amphlett, ChienTi Plummer Lee, Anna K. Walther, Xiyao Liu
{"title":"Addressing Access Barriers in Rural America: A Mixed-Methods Study of Wisconsin's Family Resource Centers","authors":"Joshua P. Mersky, Colleen E. Janczewski, Jack Pollard, Allison Amphlett, ChienTi Plummer Lee, Anna K. Walther, Xiyao Liu","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Family Resource Centers (FRCs) are place-based programs with great potential to address rural access barriers and improve health outcomes, yet empirical evidence on these programs is lacking. Using multiple data sources from a longitudinal investigation in Wisconsin, this mixed-methods study analyzed whether and how FRCs address rural access barriers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used to gather, analyze, and interpret quantitative and qualitative data. Data from the Child Opportunity Index were used to compare opportunities in rural and nonrural areas statewide and among 646 rural and nonrural families who received support from one of 18 FRCs. Qualitative data gathered from interviews with nine FRC participants and 11 FRC staff were synthesized to describe rural access barriers and facilitators. To compare the types of support received by rural and nonrural families, baseline survey data collected from 646 FRC participants were analyzed using chi-square tests. To test whether FRC participation increased referral connections, follow-up survey data collected from 319 FRC recipients and a matched sample of 458 adults were analyzed via logistic regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Disparities between rural and nonrural ZIP codes were evident statewide and in FRC catchment areas. Qualitative analyses identified rural resource gaps, transportation barriers, and FRC facilitators of family engagement. Baseline survey responses indicated that rural families were more likely to receive resource referrals; nonrural families were more likely to participate in parenting programming and parent−child activities. Longitudinal analyses linked FRC participation to higher rates of resource connections.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>FRCs address social determinants that disproportionately affect rural communities. Implications for public health intervention and policy are discussed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"42 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Family Resource Centers (FRCs) are place-based programs with great potential to address rural access barriers and improve health outcomes, yet empirical evidence on these programs is lacking. Using multiple data sources from a longitudinal investigation in Wisconsin, this mixed-methods study analyzed whether and how FRCs address rural access barriers.
Methods
A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used to gather, analyze, and interpret quantitative and qualitative data. Data from the Child Opportunity Index were used to compare opportunities in rural and nonrural areas statewide and among 646 rural and nonrural families who received support from one of 18 FRCs. Qualitative data gathered from interviews with nine FRC participants and 11 FRC staff were synthesized to describe rural access barriers and facilitators. To compare the types of support received by rural and nonrural families, baseline survey data collected from 646 FRC participants were analyzed using chi-square tests. To test whether FRC participation increased referral connections, follow-up survey data collected from 319 FRC recipients and a matched sample of 458 adults were analyzed via logistic regression.
Findings
Disparities between rural and nonrural ZIP codes were evident statewide and in FRC catchment areas. Qualitative analyses identified rural resource gaps, transportation barriers, and FRC facilitators of family engagement. Baseline survey responses indicated that rural families were more likely to receive resource referrals; nonrural families were more likely to participate in parenting programming and parent−child activities. Longitudinal analyses linked FRC participation to higher rates of resource connections.
Conclusions
FRCs address social determinants that disproportionately affect rural communities. Implications for public health intervention and policy are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.