Autonomy undermined: how NHS institutional culture fails pregnant patients.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 LAW
Mélinée Kazarian, Dani O'Connor
{"title":"Autonomy undermined: how NHS institutional culture fails pregnant patients.","authors":"Mélinée Kazarian, Dani O'Connor","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwag027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maternity care in the UK continues to confront profound and systemic failings, despite decades of legal and ethical commitments to patient-centred care. This article demonstrates that these failings are not simply operational or episodic but stem from an entrenched institutional culture of paternalism that routinely suppresses women's autonomy. Drawing on major maternity inquiries alongside empirical studies documenting women's experiences of pregnancy and childbirth, the paper illustrates how women's voices are silenced, alternatives withheld, and concerns minimized-particularly for those from racialized or otherwise marginalized groups. These patterns reveal that autonomy, as currently conceived and practiced, remains largely procedural and illusory. The article argues that the dominant 'individualistic' model of autonomy cannot withstand the relational, emotional, and structural realities of pregnancy and childbirth, nor counter the gendered and hierarchical assumptions embedded within NHS practice. It proposes instead a shift towards a relational understanding of autonomy-one that recognizes vulnerability, prioritizes communication and trust, and situates decision-making within wider social and institutional contexts. Only by transforming the cultural foundations of maternity care can the promise of genuine autonomy and safe, respectful care be realized.</p>","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13452059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwag027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maternity care in the UK continues to confront profound and systemic failings, despite decades of legal and ethical commitments to patient-centred care. This article demonstrates that these failings are not simply operational or episodic but stem from an entrenched institutional culture of paternalism that routinely suppresses women's autonomy. Drawing on major maternity inquiries alongside empirical studies documenting women's experiences of pregnancy and childbirth, the paper illustrates how women's voices are silenced, alternatives withheld, and concerns minimized-particularly for those from racialized or otherwise marginalized groups. These patterns reveal that autonomy, as currently conceived and practiced, remains largely procedural and illusory. The article argues that the dominant 'individualistic' model of autonomy cannot withstand the relational, emotional, and structural realities of pregnancy and childbirth, nor counter the gendered and hierarchical assumptions embedded within NHS practice. It proposes instead a shift towards a relational understanding of autonomy-one that recognizes vulnerability, prioritizes communication and trust, and situates decision-making within wider social and institutional contexts. Only by transforming the cultural foundations of maternity care can the promise of genuine autonomy and safe, respectful care be realized.

自主权被破坏:NHS制度文化如何让怀孕患者失望。
尽管几十年来法律和道德上对以病人为中心的护理作出了承诺,但英国的产科护理仍然面临着深刻和系统性的失败。这篇文章表明,这些失败不仅仅是操作性的或偶然性的,而是源于根深蒂固的家长式制度文化,这种文化经常压制女性的自主权。根据主要的产妇调查和记录妇女怀孕和分娩经历的实证研究,本文说明了妇女的声音是如何被压制的,替代方案是如何被压制的,关注是如何被最小化的——特别是对于那些种族化或其他边缘化群体。这些模式表明,目前设想和实践的自治在很大程度上仍然是程序性的和虚幻的。文章认为,占主导地位的“个人主义”自主模式无法承受怀孕和分娩的关系、情感和结构现实,也无法对抗NHS实践中嵌入的性别和等级假设。相反,它建议转向对自主性的关系理解——认识到脆弱性,优先考虑沟通和信任,并将决策置于更广泛的社会和制度背景中。只有改变产妇护理的文化基础,才能实现真正自主和安全、尊重护理的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Law Review
Medical Law Review MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Law Review is established as an authoritative source of reference for academics, lawyers, legal and medical practitioners, law students, and anyone interested in healthcare and the law. The journal presents articles of international interest which provide thorough analyses and comment on the wide range of topical issues that are fundamental to this expanding area of law. In addition, commentary sections provide in depth explorations of topical aspects of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书