Efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) on Anxiety Severity Among Physicians and Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units.

IF 1.6 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2026-08-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ccrp/7865426
Nastran Hatami, Mina Jouzi, Sara Kord, Behrooz Zarasvand
{"title":"Efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) on Anxiety Severity Among Physicians and Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units.","authors":"Nastran Hatami, Mina Jouzi, Sara Kord, Behrooz Zarasvand","doi":"10.1155/ccrp/7865426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians and nurses working in intensive care units (ICUs) are frequently exposed to emotionally demanding and high-stress situations, placing them at increased risk for anxiety. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) has shown promise in reducing anxiety in various high-stress populations; however, its effectiveness among ICU staff remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of EMDR in reducing anxiety severity among ICU physicians and nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quasi-experimental study was conducted among 60 ICU staff members who were allocated to either an EMDR intervention group (<i>n</i> = 30) or a control group (<i>n</i> = 30). Anxiety severity was assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at baseline and post-intervention. The EMDR protocol consisted of eight sessions delivered twice weekly. Data were analyzed using paired <i>t</i>-tests and ANCOVA controlling for baseline anxiety. Internal consistency of the BAI was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants completed the study with no dropouts. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The EMDR group showed a significant reduction in anxiety from baseline to post-intervention (<i>p</i> < 0.01), whereas the control group showed no significant change. ANCOVA revealed a significant effect of EMDR on post-intervention anxiety scores (F(1,57) = 4.21, <i>p</i> = 0.045). Cronbach's alpha for the BAI in this sample was 0.89.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EMDR significantly reduced anxiety among ICU physicians and nurses. Given the high emotional burden in critical care settings, EMDR may be a valuable component of mental health support programs for healthcare professionals. Further randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":"2026 ","pages":"7865426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13451961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ccrp/7865426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physicians and nurses working in intensive care units (ICUs) are frequently exposed to emotionally demanding and high-stress situations, placing them at increased risk for anxiety. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) has shown promise in reducing anxiety in various high-stress populations; however, its effectiveness among ICU staff remains underexplored.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of EMDR in reducing anxiety severity among ICU physicians and nurses.

Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted among 60 ICU staff members who were allocated to either an EMDR intervention group (n = 30) or a control group (n = 30). Anxiety severity was assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at baseline and post-intervention. The EMDR protocol consisted of eight sessions delivered twice weekly. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests and ANCOVA controlling for baseline anxiety. Internal consistency of the BAI was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.

Results: All participants completed the study with no dropouts. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The EMDR group showed a significant reduction in anxiety from baseline to post-intervention (p < 0.01), whereas the control group showed no significant change. ANCOVA revealed a significant effect of EMDR on post-intervention anxiety scores (F(1,57) = 4.21, p = 0.045). Cronbach's alpha for the BAI in this sample was 0.89.

Conclusion: EMDR significantly reduced anxiety among ICU physicians and nurses. Given the high emotional burden in critical care settings, EMDR may be a valuable component of mental health support programs for healthcare professionals. Further randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are recommended.

眼动脱敏与再加工(EMDR)对重症监护室医护人员焦虑程度的影响
背景:在重症监护病房(icu)工作的医生和护士经常暴露在情绪要求高和压力大的情况下,使他们面临更大的焦虑风险。眼动脱敏和再加工(EMDR)在减少各种高压力人群的焦虑方面显示出希望;然而,其在ICU工作人员中的有效性仍未得到充分探讨。目的:评价EMDR对降低ICU医师和护士焦虑严重程度的效果。方法:将60名ICU工作人员分为EMDR干预组(n = 30)和对照组(n = 30)进行准实验研究。在基线和干预后使用贝克焦虑量表(BAI)评估焦虑严重程度。EMDR方案包括每周两次的8次会议。数据分析采用配对t检验和ANCOVA控制基线焦虑。使用Cronbach's alpha评估BAI的内部一致性。结果:所有参与者都完成了研究,没有退出。各组间基线特征具有可比性。EMDR组从基线到干预后焦虑显著减少(p < 0.01),而对照组无显著变化。ANCOVA显示EMDR对干预后焦虑评分有显著影响(F(1,57) = 4.21, p = 0.045)。该样本中BAI的Cronbach's alpha为0.89。结论:EMDR可显著降低ICU医师和护士的焦虑。鉴于重症监护环境中的高情绪负担,EMDR可能是医疗保健专业人员心理健康支持计划的一个有价值的组成部分。建议进一步进行长期随访的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书