Clinical accountability in fragmented primary care for older adults: a practical framework for minimal multidimensional assessment and targeted testing in community and home-based settings.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Joomong Park
{"title":"Clinical accountability in fragmented primary care for older adults: a practical framework for minimal multidimensional assessment and targeted testing in community and home-based settings.","authors":"Joomong Park","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2026-004209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fragmented care in older adults often results in duplicated testing, delayed decision-making and unclear clinical responsibility. These challenges are particularly pronounced in community and home-based primary care settings, where multiple providers contribute to care without formal coordination structures. Although comprehensive multidimensional geriatric evaluation is recommended, its complexity limits routine implementation. This article proposes a pragmatic framework integrating assessment of daily functioning, cognitive screening, mood assessment and mobility evaluation with targeted laboratory testing guided by clinical findings. A central principle of this model is clinical accountability, defined as the responsibility of the clinician who performs assessment and interprets findings to integrate diagnostic results into patient management and follow-up. In this framework, accountability refers specifically to responsibility for documenting findings, initiating appropriate follow-up evaluation and ensuring communication of clinically significant results. By linking brief multidimensional assessment, problem-oriented testing and explicit responsibility for follow-up, this practice-informed communication offers a pragmatic, adaptable approach for family physicians and community-based clinicians working in fragmented care environments. It is presented as a practice-informed proposal rather than a validated framework, consensus statement or guideline.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13436072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2026-004209","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fragmented care in older adults often results in duplicated testing, delayed decision-making and unclear clinical responsibility. These challenges are particularly pronounced in community and home-based primary care settings, where multiple providers contribute to care without formal coordination structures. Although comprehensive multidimensional geriatric evaluation is recommended, its complexity limits routine implementation. This article proposes a pragmatic framework integrating assessment of daily functioning, cognitive screening, mood assessment and mobility evaluation with targeted laboratory testing guided by clinical findings. A central principle of this model is clinical accountability, defined as the responsibility of the clinician who performs assessment and interprets findings to integrate diagnostic results into patient management and follow-up. In this framework, accountability refers specifically to responsibility for documenting findings, initiating appropriate follow-up evaluation and ensuring communication of clinically significant results. By linking brief multidimensional assessment, problem-oriented testing and explicit responsibility for follow-up, this practice-informed communication offers a pragmatic, adaptable approach for family physicians and community-based clinicians working in fragmented care environments. It is presented as a practice-informed proposal rather than a validated framework, consensus statement or guideline.

支离破碎的老年人初级保健中的临床问责制:在社区和家庭环境中进行最低限度多维评估和有针对性测试的实用框架
老年人支离破碎的护理往往导致重复检测,延迟决策和不明确的临床责任。这些挑战在社区和家庭初级保健环境中尤为明显,在这些环境中,多个提供者在没有正式协调结构的情况下提供护理。虽然推荐综合多维老年评估,但其复杂性限制了常规实施。本文提出了一个实用的框架,将日常功能评估、认知筛查、情绪评估和活动能力评估与临床结果指导下的有针对性的实验室测试结合起来。该模型的一个核心原则是临床责任,定义为临床医生的责任,他们进行评估和解释发现,将诊断结果整合到患者管理和随访中。在这个框架中,问责制具体是指记录发现、启动适当的随访评估和确保临床重要结果的沟通的责任。通过将简短的多维评估、问题导向测试和明确的后续责任联系起来,这种实践知情的沟通为在分散护理环境中工作的家庭医生和社区临床医生提供了一种务实、适应性强的方法。它是作为一个实践知情的建议而不是一个经过验证的框架、共识声明或指导方针提出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书