When biological complexity demands more than better trial designs.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Tumori Pub Date : 2026-08-09 DOI:10.1177/03008916261473076
Matteo Janni, Celeste Cagnazzo
{"title":"When biological complexity demands more than better trial designs.","authors":"Matteo Janni, Celeste Cagnazzo","doi":"10.1177/03008916261473076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing complexity of precision medicine has highlighted the limitations of traditional randomized clinical trials (RCTs) when applied to highly stratified populations and biologically heterogeneous diseases. In this context, master protocols represent an evolution towards integrated experimental infrastructures, capable of simultaneously evaluating multiple interventions or molecular subgroups within a single methodological framework.These designs redefine the role of randomization in complex settings. Conventional RCTs remain indispensable as confirmatory studies, thanks to their methodological rigor and the robustness of the evidence they generate.Future developments will depend on the capacity to ensure statistical rigor, transparent governance, data protection and equitable access to experimental infrastructures and advanced molecular screening. In this evolving landscape, master protocols emerge not as a methodological trend, but as one of the most convincing tools for making evidence generation faster, more flexible, and more sustainable without giving up the scientific standards required by contemporary clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":23349,"journal":{"name":"Tumori","volume":" ","pages":"3008916261473076"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916261473076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing complexity of precision medicine has highlighted the limitations of traditional randomized clinical trials (RCTs) when applied to highly stratified populations and biologically heterogeneous diseases. In this context, master protocols represent an evolution towards integrated experimental infrastructures, capable of simultaneously evaluating multiple interventions or molecular subgroups within a single methodological framework.These designs redefine the role of randomization in complex settings. Conventional RCTs remain indispensable as confirmatory studies, thanks to their methodological rigor and the robustness of the evidence they generate.Future developments will depend on the capacity to ensure statistical rigor, transparent governance, data protection and equitable access to experimental infrastructures and advanced molecular screening. In this evolving landscape, master protocols emerge not as a methodological trend, but as one of the most convincing tools for making evidence generation faster, more flexible, and more sustainable without giving up the scientific standards required by contemporary clinical research.

当生物复杂性需要的不仅仅是更好的试验设计时。
精准医学的日益复杂凸显了传统随机临床试验(rct)在应用于高度分层人群和生物异质性疾病时的局限性。在这种情况下,主方案代表了向综合实验基础设施的发展,能够在单一方法框架内同时评估多种干预措施或分子亚群。这些设计重新定义了随机化在复杂环境中的作用。传统的随机对照试验仍然是不可缺少的验证性研究,这要归功于其方法的严谨性和证据的稳健性。未来的发展将取决于确保统计严谨性、透明治理、数据保护和公平获得实验基础设施和先进分子筛选的能力。在这种不断发展的环境中,主方案的出现不是作为一种方法学趋势,而是作为一种最有说服力的工具,在不放弃当代临床研究所需的科学标准的情况下,使证据生成更快、更灵活、更可持续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tumori
Tumori 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tumori Journal covers all aspects of cancer science and clinical practice with a strong focus on prevention, translational medicine and clinically relevant reports. We invite the publication of randomized trials and reports on large, consecutive patient series that investigate the real impact of new techniques, drugs and devices inday-to-day clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书