A Community-Based Participatory Approach to Develop a Social Risk Screening Protocol, Tailored to the Needs of Pregnant and Postpartum People in Metro Atlanta.

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2026-08-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/24731242261475078
Kayla Adams, Zykevise Gamble, Sheree L Boulet, Asha Immanuelle, Sandra-Lily Lantum, Seema Csukas, Hannah Kumarasamy, Rosalind Hill, Natalie Albright, Virgina Tester, Kaitlyn K Stanhope
{"title":"A Community-Based Participatory Approach to Develop a Social Risk Screening Protocol, Tailored to the Needs of Pregnant and Postpartum People in Metro Atlanta.","authors":"Kayla Adams, Zykevise Gamble, Sheree L Boulet, Asha Immanuelle, Sandra-Lily Lantum, Seema Csukas, Hannah Kumarasamy, Rosalind Hill, Natalie Albright, Virgina Tester, Kaitlyn K Stanhope","doi":"10.1177/24731242261475078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our goal was to co-create a locally tailored social risk screening protocol for use in obstetric care settings in Metro Atlanta.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a community-based participatory study consisting of key informant interviews and a year-long working group. Interviews were conducted with representatives of community organizations (<i>n</i> = 7) and people who were currently or recently pregnant (<i>n</i> = 8). Select interview participants and care providers were then invited to participate in a working group. Over six meetings, the group collaboratively reviewed interview data, current literature, published screening tools, and local resource information for eight domains: education/employment, health literacy, housing, food insecurity, financial strain, childcare, safety, and transportation. A final set of questions and recommended processes for social needs screening during pregnancy and postpartum were iteratively derived via group consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key interview themes included the need for a central and reliable source of information, challenges of enrollment, limited availability of resources for some domains of needs (e.g., housing), and the inability of passive navigation strategies (e.g., written resource lists) to effectively meet needs. The working group created a final screening tool consisting of a combination of an initial question regarding any urgent needs and 36 multiple-choice and open-ended questions. The tool included recommendations for timing of screening during pregnancy and processes for resource provision within each domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The community-informed social needs screening tool and protocol provides a framework for targeted social support during and after pregnancy that could be integrated in routine obstetric care in Metro Atlanta and other practice settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"10 ","pages":"24731242261475078"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13451746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24731242261475078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Our goal was to co-create a locally tailored social risk screening protocol for use in obstetric care settings in Metro Atlanta.

Methods: We conducted a community-based participatory study consisting of key informant interviews and a year-long working group. Interviews were conducted with representatives of community organizations (n = 7) and people who were currently or recently pregnant (n = 8). Select interview participants and care providers were then invited to participate in a working group. Over six meetings, the group collaboratively reviewed interview data, current literature, published screening tools, and local resource information for eight domains: education/employment, health literacy, housing, food insecurity, financial strain, childcare, safety, and transportation. A final set of questions and recommended processes for social needs screening during pregnancy and postpartum were iteratively derived via group consensus.

Results: Key interview themes included the need for a central and reliable source of information, challenges of enrollment, limited availability of resources for some domains of needs (e.g., housing), and the inability of passive navigation strategies (e.g., written resource lists) to effectively meet needs. The working group created a final screening tool consisting of a combination of an initial question regarding any urgent needs and 36 multiple-choice and open-ended questions. The tool included recommendations for timing of screening during pregnancy and processes for resource provision within each domain.

Conclusions: The community-informed social needs screening tool and protocol provides a framework for targeted social support during and after pregnancy that could be integrated in routine obstetric care in Metro Atlanta and other practice settings.

以社区为基础的参与式方法制定社会风险筛查方案,适合亚特兰大大都会孕妇和产后人群的需求。
前言:我们的目标是共同创建一个本地定制的社会风险筛查方案,用于亚特兰大大都会的产科护理设置。方法:我们进行了一项以社区为基础的参与性研究,包括关键线人访谈和为期一年的工作组。对社区组织代表(n = 7)和目前或最近怀孕的人(n = 8)进行了访谈。然后邀请选定的访谈参与者和护理提供者参加一个工作组。在六次会议上,该小组共同审查了八个领域的访谈数据、当前文献、已发表的筛选工具和当地资源信息:教育/就业、卫生素养、住房、粮食不安全、财政紧张、儿童保育、安全和交通。最后一组问题和建议的过程,筛选社会需求在怀孕期间和产后是通过群体共识迭代得出的。结果:关键的访谈主题包括对中心和可靠的信息来源的需求,入学的挑战,某些需求领域(如住房)资源的有限可用性,以及被动导航策略(如书面资源列表)无法有效满足需求。工作组制定了一个最终筛选工具,包括一个关于任何紧急需求的初始问题和36个选择题和开放式问题。该工具包括对怀孕期间筛查时间的建议以及在每个领域内提供资源的程序。结论:社区知情的社会需求筛查工具和方案为怀孕期间和之后的有针对性的社会支持提供了一个框架,可以整合到亚特兰大大都会和其他实践环境的常规产科护理中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书