Effect of Rapid Molecular Diagnostic Implementation on Time to Targeted Antibiotic Treatment for Bloodstream Infections: A Before-and-After Study at a Community Teaching Hospital.

Q2 Medicine
Brant Botill, Lan Bui, Jennifer Collins, Ariel Hearing, Erenie Guirguis
{"title":"Effect of Rapid Molecular Diagnostic Implementation on Time to Targeted Antibiotic Treatment for Bloodstream Infections: A Before-and-After Study at a Community Teaching Hospital.","authors":"Brant Botill, Lan Bui, Jennifer Collins, Ariel Hearing, Erenie Guirguis","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2026.198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Bloodstream infections (BSIs) require prompt, targeted antimicrobial therapy, but traditional blood culture methods may delay optimal treatment. The BIOFIRE® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel provides rapid pathogen identification and mayreduce time to targeted therapy. This study evaluated the impact of BCID2 implementation at a community teaching hospital. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective, quasi-experimental pre/post study was conducted at a for-profit community teaching hospital in adults aged ≥18 years with BSIs. Eligible patients had bacteremia, blood cultures collected, and empiric antibiotic therapy initiated during the study periods. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, detection of multiple pathogens in a single culture, availability of susceptibility results before the designated timeline, and discharge, transfer, or leaving against medical advice before completion of testing. The pre-implementation group included 64 patients (October-December 2023), and the postimplementation group included 60 patients (October 2024-February 2025). The primary outcome was time from blood culture collection to initiation of targeted antibiotic therapy based on final susceptibility results. Secondary outcomes included pathogen identification, empiric and total antibiotic use, and length of stay. <b>Results:</b> The study included 124 patients (mean age, 70.5 ± 17.3 years; 67% ≥65 years; 50% male). Blood cultures were ordered for suspected sepsis/septic shock in 58% of patients and suspected secondary bacteremia in 42%. Pathogen distribution was similar between groups, with <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>, and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> identified most frequently. BCID2 implementation significantly reduced time to optimal therapy (3.73 ± 2.01 vs. 2.02 ± 1.48 days, p<0.001) and empiric antibiotic duration (3.73 ± 2.01 vs. 2.04 ± 1.48 days, p < 0.001). Total antibiotic duration and length of stay did not differ significantly between groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> BCID2 implementation at a community hospital significantly shortened time to optimal therapy and reduced empiric antibiotic use among older hospitalized adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"41 5","pages":"198-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Senior Care Pharmacist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2026.198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) require prompt, targeted antimicrobial therapy, but traditional blood culture methods may delay optimal treatment. The BIOFIRE® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel provides rapid pathogen identification and mayreduce time to targeted therapy. This study evaluated the impact of BCID2 implementation at a community teaching hospital. Methods: A retrospective, quasi-experimental pre/post study was conducted at a for-profit community teaching hospital in adults aged ≥18 years with BSIs. Eligible patients had bacteremia, blood cultures collected, and empiric antibiotic therapy initiated during the study periods. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, detection of multiple pathogens in a single culture, availability of susceptibility results before the designated timeline, and discharge, transfer, or leaving against medical advice before completion of testing. The pre-implementation group included 64 patients (October-December 2023), and the postimplementation group included 60 patients (October 2024-February 2025). The primary outcome was time from blood culture collection to initiation of targeted antibiotic therapy based on final susceptibility results. Secondary outcomes included pathogen identification, empiric and total antibiotic use, and length of stay. Results: The study included 124 patients (mean age, 70.5 ± 17.3 years; 67% ≥65 years; 50% male). Blood cultures were ordered for suspected sepsis/septic shock in 58% of patients and suspected secondary bacteremia in 42%. Pathogen distribution was similar between groups, with Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Staphylococcus aureus identified most frequently. BCID2 implementation significantly reduced time to optimal therapy (3.73 ± 2.01 vs. 2.02 ± 1.48 days, p<0.001) and empiric antibiotic duration (3.73 ± 2.01 vs. 2.04 ± 1.48 days, p < 0.001). Total antibiotic duration and length of stay did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: BCID2 implementation at a community hospital significantly shortened time to optimal therapy and reduced empiric antibiotic use among older hospitalized adults.

快速分子诊断实施对血流感染靶向抗生素治疗时间的影响:社区教学医院前后对比研究
目的:血液感染(bsi)需要及时,有针对性的抗菌治疗,但传统的血液培养方法可能会延迟最佳治疗。BIOFIRE®血培养鉴定2 (bid2)面板提供快速病原体鉴定,并可能缩短靶向治疗的时间。本研究评估了社区教学医院实施bccid2的影响。方法:在一家营利性社区教学医院对年龄≥18岁的脑损伤成人患者进行回顾性、准实验性研究。在研究期间,符合条件的患者有菌血症,收集了血液培养,并开始了经验性抗生素治疗。排除标准包括怀孕、在单一培养物中检测到多种病原体、在指定时间之前获得敏感性结果,以及在完成检测之前出院、转院或不遵医嘱离开。实施前组64例(2023年10月- 12月),实施后组60例(2024年10月- 2025年2月)。主要观察指标是根据最终敏感性结果从血培养收集到开始靶向抗生素治疗的时间。次要结局包括病原体鉴定、经验性和总抗生素使用以及住院时间。结果:纳入124例患者(平均年龄70.5±17.3岁,67%≥65岁,50%男性)。58%的患者进行了疑似败血症/感染性休克的血培养,42%的患者进行了疑似继发性菌血症的血培养。各组间病原菌分布相似,以大肠杆菌、表皮葡萄球菌、粪肠球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌最为常见。结论:社区医院实施BCID2可显著缩短老年住院患者获得最佳治疗的时间(3.73±2.01天vs. 2.02±1.48天),减少经验性抗生素使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Senior Care Pharmacist
Senior Care Pharmacist PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书