Preferred Sources of Health-Risk Information About Cigarettes, e-Cigarettes, and Waterpipes Among Adolescents in Germany: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Large School-Based Survey.

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2026-08-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173X261473915
Stephanie Klosterhalfen, Cynthia Fedler, Reiner Hanewinkel, Clemens Neumann, Julia Hansen
{"title":"Preferred Sources of Health-Risk Information About Cigarettes, e-Cigarettes, and Waterpipes Among Adolescents in Germany: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Large School-Based Survey.","authors":"Stephanie Klosterhalfen, Cynthia Fedler, Reiner Hanewinkel, Clemens Neumann, Julia Hansen","doi":"10.1177/1179173X261473915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescent nicotine use remains a major public health concern, particularly in the context of increasing e-cigarette uptake and gaps in tobacco-control communication. Effective prevention requires evidence on the information channels through which adolescents prefer to receive risk information about tobacco and nicotine products.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined adolescents' preferred sources for receiving information about the health risks of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and waterpipes in Germany, and assessed differences by age, gender, school type, and nicotine-use status.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of a large nationwide school-based survey across 14 of 16 German federal states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from the 2024/2025 wave of the Präventionsradar study and included 21,841 adolescents aged 9-17 years from 116 schools and 1,712 classes across 14 German federal states. Weighted descriptive analyses and multilevel logistic regression models were used to examine preferred information sources and information refusal. Models were adjusted for age, gender, school type, and current nicotine-product use, with random intercepts at the class level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parents (30.2%), social media (21.5%), and physicians (18.6%) were the most frequently selected information sources. Younger adolescents more often selected parents, whereas older adolescents more often selected social media and peers. Adolescents currently using at least one tobacco or nicotine product were more likely to select friends and less likely to select parents, teachers, or physicians. They were also more likely to report not wanting health information. Information refusal was additionally associated with male gender and lower academic track.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adolescents' preferred sources of tobacco- and nicotine-related health information differ substantially by sociodemographic characteristics and nicotine-use status. These findings may inform the development of differentiated and multimodal communication strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"19 ","pages":"1179173X261473915"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13451740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X261473915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adolescent nicotine use remains a major public health concern, particularly in the context of increasing e-cigarette uptake and gaps in tobacco-control communication. Effective prevention requires evidence on the information channels through which adolescents prefer to receive risk information about tobacco and nicotine products.

Objectives: This study examined adolescents' preferred sources for receiving information about the health risks of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and waterpipes in Germany, and assessed differences by age, gender, school type, and nicotine-use status.

Design: Cross-sectional analysis of a large nationwide school-based survey across 14 of 16 German federal states.

Methods: Data were drawn from the 2024/2025 wave of the Präventionsradar study and included 21,841 adolescents aged 9-17 years from 116 schools and 1,712 classes across 14 German federal states. Weighted descriptive analyses and multilevel logistic regression models were used to examine preferred information sources and information refusal. Models were adjusted for age, gender, school type, and current nicotine-product use, with random intercepts at the class level.

Results: Parents (30.2%), social media (21.5%), and physicians (18.6%) were the most frequently selected information sources. Younger adolescents more often selected parents, whereas older adolescents more often selected social media and peers. Adolescents currently using at least one tobacco or nicotine product were more likely to select friends and less likely to select parents, teachers, or physicians. They were also more likely to report not wanting health information. Information refusal was additionally associated with male gender and lower academic track.

Conclusion: Adolescents' preferred sources of tobacco- and nicotine-related health information differ substantially by sociodemographic characteristics and nicotine-use status. These findings may inform the development of differentiated and multimodal communication strategies.

德国青少年关于香烟、电子烟和水烟的首选健康风险信息来源:一项大型学校调查的横断面分析
背景:青少年尼古丁使用仍然是一个主要的公共卫生问题,特别是在电子烟使用量增加和烟草控制沟通存在差距的背景下。有效预防需要有证据表明青少年倾向于通过哪些信息渠道获得有关烟草和尼古丁产品的风险信息。目的:本研究调查了德国青少年接受香烟、电子烟和水烟健康风险信息的首选来源,并评估了年龄、性别、学校类型和尼古丁使用状况的差异。设计:对德国16个联邦州中14个州的大型全国性学校调查进行横断面分析。方法:数据来自Präventionsradar研究的2024/2025年浪潮,包括来自德国14个联邦州116所学校和1712个班级的21,841名9-17岁的青少年。加权描述性分析和多层逻辑回归模型被用来检验首选信息源和信息拒绝。模型根据年龄、性别、学校类型和当前尼古丁产品使用情况进行调整,并在班级水平上随机截取。结果:父母(30.2%)、社交媒体(21.5%)和医生(18.6%)是最常选择的信息来源。年幼的青少年更常选择父母,而年长的青少年更常选择社交媒体和同龄人。目前至少使用一种烟草或尼古丁产品的青少年更有可能选择朋友,而不太可能选择父母、老师或医生。他们也更有可能表示不想要健康信息。信息拒绝还与男性性别和较低的学术轨迹有关。结论:青少年对烟草和尼古丁相关健康信息的偏好来源因社会人口学特征和尼古丁使用状况而有很大差异。这些发现可以为差异化和多模式传播策略的发展提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书